Draguns
Members-
Posts
1,327 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Draguns last won the day on January 12 2020
Draguns had the most liked content!
Profile Fields
-
Sex
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
2,678 profile views
Draguns's Achievements
DEMI-GOD (5/10)
1.3k
Reputation
-
Axl has his own Website now
Draguns replied to kingcanyon's topic in GUNS N' ROSES - DISCUSSION & NEWS
Who's to say that GNR has to perform new songs in a live setting, though?! Don't Damn Me is one of the best songs ever from GNR and it has never been performed live by GNR. There's no rule stating that songs have to be performed at a concert. -
That is very odd!
-
Did I read that correctly??? A fan collects used Band- Aids?! That sounds gross!
-
I like the Dr. Feelgood album, but I would not want to see Motley Cru perform since they aren't performing live. I'm also doubting what Nikki Sixx is saying given the fact that Axl and Vince Neil never publicly made up. Additionally, you have Crash Diet, which was about Vince killing the drummer of Hanoi Rocks.
-
That's not how business works, though. My suggestion for you is to take business classes or do research. Here's a good example. Mike Bloomberg owns about 80% of Bloomberg LP. Bloomberg LP is a private company. Theoretically, Mike is the ultimate decision maker. However, there are several others who have shares that own a certain percentage of the company. These people do not have Mike as a boss. Mike formed a management committee to share the responsibility of decision making with the people who own the shares. These people are their own bosses at the company. As @Blackstar mentions, we don't know how the partnership is structured. We don't know if they went back to the 1992 partnership or something else with different percentages of ownership. What we do know is that there was a 2017 filing in California showing that the three of them are partners in the business entity of GNR. We also know that they were listed as partners in the lawsuit against the brewery. This confirms that Slash and Duff are not employees. They are in fact bosses. Partnerships in business does not mean that they are or can be equal partners. They can have different percentages and structure decision making responsibilities differently.
-
A couple of years ago, @Blackstar and I did research. We both posted on this forum. The three of them are partners. I found a legal document in the California business registry that was filed in 2017. Just a bit of background on me, part of my previous job at Bloomberg was to search for legal filings pertaining to Private Equity and Venture Capital firms regarding partnerships and funds. So I know what I'm talking about. Additionally, @Blackstar posted the lawsuit that they filed against the brewery as partners. I really wish people would research things before yapping on the Internet.
-
Not confusing either one of you. If you reread your post, you would see how you were contradicting yourself. On the one hand you were saying he doesn't owe the fans anything. On the other hand, you were using the argument to say that Axl produced 19 songs. It was a backhanded and sneaky way to support Jim's argument. Anyway I have work to be done. Have a nice day!
-
This is exactly why I had blocked you a long time ago. You are trying to make an argument when you really don't have any ground. I heard exactly what you said. You were trying to equate new music with buying a ticket for a concert. The two are totally separate. Additionally, you were using the ticket sales argument with saying that apologetics was produced. If anything, you didn't listen to what I was saying. In a backhanded way, you were trying to say that I was defending Axl and not releasing new music. I get the frustration of not getting new music. I am disappointed as well. It is what it is though. If new music gets released then that that is great. If not then I'll just listen to songs by GNR and the solo efforts. It is what it is. With that being said, buying tickets for a concert or show does not mean that I am owed new songs. That argument is illogical to say the least.
-
As Stone Cold Steve Austin would say: What??? No matter the performer, the only obligation they have to the customer that bought ticket(s) for a concert or show is to perform at that place of venue. To say that an artist or band owes you new songs because you bought a ticket to a show, it's just ABSURD!!! The contract is the ticket for the performance. It's NOT a contract for new songs. Wow! The logic from here is really out there!!