Welcome to mygnrforum.com Guns N' Roses Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
vaida

"Come on Beta, you can't believe everything you read on the Internet" in response to rumors of Slash's inclusion heard by Rose's rep Beta Lebeis."

139 posts in this topic

Back on topic;

Vivaldi purchased an interest in Guitar Hero,Vivaldi is also the parent company of UMG,so without delving deeper its a bit more complicated than people are aware.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

iu

No it was justified,and if it had been deeemed frivolous the judge would have dismissed it.

Arnold you should get a girl.

This.

This is all too amusing. Damn I have to go to work now.

have a great day Redhead!!! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

The lawsuit itself makes sense to file as Activision lied to Axl (as it's claimed) but for Axl to repeatedly email Activision asking and making sure that Slash/VR's image won't be used in the game because it will "distort perception of the band's image" is ridiculous. Slash is a huge part of GNR's image and if Axl cares THAT much about changing that, he could start by releasing his own music, making public appearances, and doing band-like things. All of those would work better then filing lawsuits to attempt to discontinue Slash's association with GNR's legacy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

The lawsuit itself makes sense to file as Activision lied to Axl (as it's claimed) but for Axl to repeatedly email Activision asking and making sure that Slash/VR's image won't be used in the game because it will "distort perception of the band's image" is ridiculous. Slash is a huge part of GNR's image and if Axl cares THAT much about changing that, he could start by releasing his own music, making public appearances, and doing band-like things. All of those would work better then filing lawsuits to attempt to discontinue Slash's association with GNR's legacy.

At the trial, Axl (sure he won't be there, but he should attend) should be asked: 'if your focus is for the future, the future of your new band, why did not simply offer a song by the current line up?'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

The lawsuit itself makes sense to file as Activision lied to Axl (as it's claimed) but for Axl to repeatedly email Activision asking and making sure that Slash/VR's image won't be used in the game because it will "distort perception of the band's image" is ridiculous. Slash is a huge part of GNR's image and if Axl cares THAT much about changing that, he could start by releasing his own music, making public appearances, and doing band-like things. All of those would work better then filing lawsuits to attempt to discontinue Slash's association with GNR's legacy.

I agree with all of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

The lawsuit itself makes sense to file as Activision lied to Axl (as it's claimed) but for Axl to repeatedly email Activision asking and making sure that Slash/VR's image won't be used in the game because it will "distort perception of the band's image" is ridiculous. Slash is a huge part of GNR's image and if Axl cares THAT much about changing that, he could start by releasing his own music, making public appearances, and doing band-like things. All of those would work better then filing lawsuits to attempt to discontinue Slash's association with GNR's legacy.

I agree with all of that.

Me too. Well said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

The lawsuit itself makes sense to file as Activision lied to Axl (as it's claimed) but for Axl to repeatedly email Activision asking and making sure that Slash/VR's image won't be used in the game because it will "distort perception of the band's image" is ridiculous. Slash is a huge part of GNR's image and if Axl cares THAT much about changing that, he could start by releasing his own music, making public appearances, and doing band-like things. All of those would work better then filing lawsuits to attempt to discontinue Slash's association with GNR's legacy.

End of thread as far as I'm concerned. Great post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It should be pointed that this quote will prove to be extremely ironic if Axl's camp can't use the words from Tim Riley because if it is undocumented hearsay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It should be pointed that this quote will prove to be extremely ironic if Axl's camp can't use the words from Tim Riley because if it is undocumented hearsay.

You don't know what hearsay is do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

The lawsuit itself makes sense to file as Activision lied to Axl (as it's claimed) but for Axl to repeatedly email Activision asking and making sure that Slash/VR's image won't be used in the game because it will "distort perception of the band's image" is ridiculous. Slash is a huge part of GNR's image and if Axl cares THAT much about changing that, he could start by releasing his own music, making public appearances, and doing band-like things. All of those would work better then filing lawsuits to attempt to discontinue Slash's association with GNR's legacy.

Fantastic post, I completely agree

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slash had nothing to do with Gn'rs ongoing popularity since 1996. It clearly was the steady stream of touring and new material produced by Axl Rose :rolleyes:

Also, of course, Velvet Revolver did nothing to help make the public aware of Gn'rs legacy. No one even knows Slash was in Gnr!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slash had nothing to do with Gn'rs ongoing popularity since 1996. It clearly was the steady stream of touring and new material produced by Axl Rose :rolleyes:

Also, of course, Velvet Revolver did nothing to help make the public aware of Gn'rs legacy. No one even knows Slash was in Gnr!

So?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slash had nothing to do with Gn'rs ongoing popularity since 1996. It clearly was the steady stream of touring and new material produced by Axl Rose :rolleyes:

Also, of course, Velvet Revolver did nothing to help make the public aware of Gn'rs legacy. No one even knows Slash was in Gnr!

So?

The basic claims of the complaint are bull shit. I hope he wins though, get that money Axl!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slash had nothing to do with Gn'rs ongoing popularity since 1996. It clearly was the steady stream of touring and new material produced by Axl Rose :rolleyes:

Also, of course, Velvet Revolver did nothing to help make the public aware of Gn'rs legacy. No one even knows Slash was in Gnr!

So?

The basic claims of the complaint are bull shit. I hope he wins though, get that money Axl!

Yeah, I wouldn't mind that payday at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slash had nothing to do with Gn'rs ongoing popularity since 1996. It clearly was the steady stream of touring and new material produced by Axl Rose :rolleyes:

Also, of course, Velvet Revolver did nothing to help make the public aware of Gn'rs legacy. No one even knows Slash was in Gnr!

So?

The basic claims of the complaint are bull shit. I hope he wins though, get that money Axl!

Maybe they're bullshit, but it's all about what was agreed on. As soon as Axl found out Slash was going to be involved, knowing he agreed to continue licensing songs to them, he prob. didn't have anything in writing and it's just a flurry of emails and lawyers letters that Activision went "okay, we'll take care of that later".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe Axl's camp is getting their inspiration for an alibi through Abraham Lincoln.

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

The lawsuit itself makes sense to file as Activision lied to Axl (as it's claimed) but for Axl to repeatedly email Activision asking and making sure that Slash/VR's image won't be used in the game because it will "distort perception of the band's image" is ridiculous. Slash is a huge part of GNR's image and if Axl cares THAT much about changing that, he could start by releasing his own music, making public appearances, and doing band-like things. All of those would work better then filing lawsuits to attempt to discontinue Slash's association with GNR's legacy.

Fantstic post. I agree with every word.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

The lawsuit itself makes sense to file as Activision lied to Axl (as it's claimed) but for Axl to repeatedly email Activision asking and making sure that Slash/VR's image won't be used in the game because it will "distort perception of the band's image" is ridiculous. Slash is a huge part of GNR's image and if Axl cares THAT much about changing that, he could start by releasing his own music, making public appearances, and doing band-like things. All of those would work better then filing lawsuits to attempt to discontinue Slash's association with GNR's legacy.

Fantstic post. I agree with every word.

goes deeper than that,Vivaldi who purchsed.Activision/Blizzard the manufactuers of Rock Star ALso is the parent company of UMG.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the fact that Slash had nothing to do with Guns N' Roses' ongoing popularity and success since 1996, his association with the band lingers, at least as far as certain member of the media are concerned.

This lawsuit is one of the dumbest things Axl has ever pulled.

Only if he loses. Pretty smart if he wins if you ask me. I'd take a free $20 million.

The lawsuit itself makes sense to file as Activision lied to Axl (as it's claimed) but for Axl to repeatedly email Activision asking and making sure that Slash/VR's image won't be used in the game because it will "distort perception of the band's image" is ridiculous. Slash is a huge part of GNR's image and if Axl cares THAT much about changing that, he could start by releasing his own music, making public appearances, and doing band-like things. All of those would work better then filing lawsuits to attempt to discontinue Slash's association with GNR's legacy.

Fantstic post. I agree with every word.

goes deeper than that,Vivaldi who purchsed.Activision/Blizzard the manufactuers of Rock Star ALso is the parent company of UMG.

Vivendi*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the whole lawsuit. Axl is right. His are the rights to WTTJ, he can do whatever he wants to do with it.

Go for it and sue the hell from those fuckers Axl!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    171,893
    Total Topics
    1,442,303
    Total Posts