Forgot your password?
Or sign in with one of these services
Vincent Vega, December 13, 2012
Posted December 13, 2012
Aerosmith has a little less filler.
Aerosmith, best band in the world, really experimental, capable of mixing Hard Rock, Heavy Metal with little hints of pop music WITHOUT losing their sound in the process, Always loved each and every one of theirs albums. Hell Honkin on Bobo kicks the hell out of TSI and comes from a band that has more than 20 years together
Stonse and it`s not even close
Null vote. Don't care for either.
Stones. I'm not usually a fan of putting bands against each other but there is no comparison to me.
Certainly The Rolliing Stones, Aerosmith were only good in the '70s and then, for a very brief period (until the smack too over around the time they recorded Draw the Line). They turned into a hidious cheesy dick ballad machine in the late '80s which is what they still are today; they do not even write their own material but hire elite pop 'song fixers' to write their 'hits' for teeny-boppers.
They're my second (Stones) and third (Aerosmith) favorite band.
Posted December 13, 2012
I could go either way with this one. But I really dig Steven Tyler's vocals over Mick's barking.
Stones all the way. I love Aerosmith, but they don't have shit on The Stones.
The Rolling Stones.
WTF? Is there even a comparison? The Rolling Stones BY FAR. Aerosmith is a good band with a couple of good albums and hits but it's SO overrated.
Aerosmith is only good if you're a 55 year old aunt.
Posted December 14, 2012
Couldn't agree more. The only comparison or similiarity between the two can be related to the size of the lead singers' lips.
Aerosmith has never really been in the same league as The Stones.
Aerosmith are really just a Stones tribute act.
Don`t particularly like either of them. That said Aerosmith have one great song with Dream on and Stones have 10-15 great songs, so Stones for me.
They were not that good in the 70s really. A few good funky rock riffs (Walk this Way, Get the Lead Out) but nothing outstanding. I believe they only became big because Americans were desperate for a homespun rock band. Americans during this period were listening to big British bands (Stones, Who, Zep, Purple). It wasn't good for the, collective ego. So America said, ''that is a band that plays blues rock; that singer looks like Jagger. Let's have them''. In Britain it didn't wash. Aerosmith toured Britain in, I think around 1975, and were laughed-off the stage.
Love both, but Aerosmith was my first favorite band, that gives them the edge for me.
The Stones are in my top 5, to be fair.
1. Stones, and it's not even close.
2. If you dont dig either of these bands, pray tell how some of you lot are Guns N' Roses fans ?
Often wondered that m self in relation to the toxic twins. When Slash repeats that often-repeated anecdote about discovering Rocks at some girls house and ignoring the girl, I keep thinking that I would sooner shag the girl and throw the Rocks album in the bin.
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Already have an account? Sign in here.
No registered users viewing this page.