Axl_morris Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Paul Tobius is going to have to breathe in a little more to make room for all the cinema reels coming to the vault 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcano62 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 "disagreement between band members"Which band members? Current (highly doubt it) or former members (bingo) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axl_morris Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 "disagreement between band members"Which band members? Current (highly doubt it) or former members (bingo)I doubt that. Slash managed to release made in stoke. None of the band members wanted the greatest hits yet they got released. There is something more sinister about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coma16 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 "disagreement between band members"Which band members? Current (highly doubt it) or former members (bingo)Bucket's Revenge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NGOG Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Cancelled in Argentina: https://www.facebook.com/gnrlatinoamerica/posts/626278120779493 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick85 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Wonder if this has to do with Ron & DJ's recent beefs. Someone getting paid more than the other(s), perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-GenerationX Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 All I know is that Axl is blameless. He worked day and night to get this done and just found no cooperation from anyone. Most likely. BTW, HTGTH just went down. Time to scrub some comments, I assume. Haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NGOG Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 FREE APPETITE FOR DEMOCRACY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-GenerationX Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 TEAM BRA-ZIL!! TEAM BRA-ZIL!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno P. Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Fuck Axl's band. Oh, while we're at it - Fuck Dj Ashba & his swag. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick85 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 TEAM BRA-ZIL!! TEAM BRA-ZIL!!Not even trying to be a dick, they're honestly the most utterly inept management team I've ever come across. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 "disagreement between band members"Which band members? Current (highly doubt it) or former members (bingo)I doubt that. Slash managed to release made in stoke. None of the band members wanted the greatest hits yet they got released. There is something more sinister about this.Not necessarily.We can't know if the author of this email knows the reasoning behind this, but assuming he's correct, given the amount of material in the show from the old band, it's entirely possible the disagreement is in regards to licensing amongst the old band partners.Ali Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDemocracyRose Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Not a good way to start a tour... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussTCB Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 I think the fact that this is cancelled is beyond ridiculous, however judging from some of the reactions you would think the email read like this: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axl_morris Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 "disagreement between band members"Which band members? Current (highly doubt it) or former members (bingo)I doubt that. Slash managed to release made in stoke. None of the band members wanted the greatest hits yet they got released. There is something more sinister about this. Not necessarily.We can't know if the author of this email knows the reasoning behind this, but assuming he's correct, given the amount of material in the show from the old band, it's entirely possible the disagreement is in regards to licensing amongst the old band partners.AliIm thinking more robin and buckethead though than slash and duff who have released GNR material solo and with velvet revolver. I cant see them stopping this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-GenerationX Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 I only hope this last bit of unpleasantness doesn't sour Axl on releasing new material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmo Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Guns N' Roses in a nutshell. You can't have the lowest of expectations with this band. They always seem to find new ways to disappoint. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthias Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 You gotta be kidding me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 "disagreement between band members"Which band members? Current (highly doubt it) or former members (bingo)I doubt that. Slash managed to release made in stoke. None of the band members wanted the greatest hits yet they got released. There is something more sinister about this. Not necessarily.We can't know if the author of this email knows the reasoning behind this, but assuming he's correct, given the amount of material in the show from the old band, it's entirely possible the disagreement is in regards to licensing amongst the old band partners.AliIm thinking more robin and buckethead though than slash and duff who have released GNR material solo and with velvet revolver. I cant see them stopping this.Slash's "Made in Stoke" was not released in the US on DVD/Blu-ray. We have no idea if Robin and/or Buckethead have any say in the licensing of Chinese Democracy material. I think it is not highly likely they do given that they were not partners in GN'R, they were salaried band members under contract.Ali Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-GenerationX Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Can we agree that if it were Slash, Duff, Bucket, Robin...or anyone that is no longer in the fold, Axl or TB should have no problem telling us that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno P. Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Guns N' Roses in a nutshell. You can't have the lowest of expectations with this band. They always seem to find new ways to disappoint.Yeah, I mean... it was kind of a done deal. This is beyond stupid and amateur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asalem182 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Eh, at the very least we'll potentially get a decent rant when (if) the tour starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axl_morris Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Eh, at the very least we'll potentially get a decent rant when (if) the tour starts.We never with london Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick85 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Can we agree that if it were Slash, Duff, Bucket, Robin...or anyone that is no longer in the fold, Axl or TB should have no problem telling us that?Well, of course they SHOULD have no problem doing that. However, to accomplish that they would have to lift their heads to stop pompously filating themselves. I'm not sure that, say, Fernando could qualify. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-GenerationX Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Can we agree that if it were Slash, Duff, Bucket, Robin...or anyone that is no longer in the fold, Axl or TB should have no problem telling us that? Well, of course they SHOULD have no problem doing that. However, to accomplish that they would have to lift their heads to stop pompously filating themselves. I'm not sure that, say, Fernando could qualify. By choosing to say nothing, can you really get too pissed if people speculate that you were, in fact, the problem? Speculation is just that, speculation, correct? And is it credible to get pissed about people incorrectly speculating its you as you sit on stone cold proof you are innocent here? If you choose not to correct the record, you can't get too pissed at misinformation, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts