TheSeeker Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 GNR has avenged the Montreal riot of 1992 with a show in 2010GNR has avenged the Vancouver riot of 2002 with a show in 2011GNR has avenged the Philadelphia riot of 2002 with a show in 2012Will GNR ever avenge the St. Louis riot of 1991? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coma16 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 (edited) Fuck St LouisHopefully one day they can though Edited July 2, 2013 by Coma16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywood Gunner Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 probably not, but if they did, id love to be there lol imagine a reunion show in st louis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carne_asaDA Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Nope, Axl is serving a lifetime ban from St. Louis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Str8 Killa Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 The magic eight ball says..... "no fucking way" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axl_morris Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Not forgetting Dublin in 2012, from the 2010 disaster. St louis? Who knows, but i doubt it, too much bad blood maybe. I can only imagine trouble makers going there also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerage5 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Really doubt it. Seems like St. Louis is held in a more serious regard than Montreal, Vancouver, or Philly.I'm there if it ever happens though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axlinkafayette Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I don't think so. Who knows with this band though.Its a great american city... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlieSheen Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 I don't see it happening somehow, it's been what 22 or 23 years since the Riverport Riot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tat2d1 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Since they most likely will never return to St. Louis, it would be nice if they would play a show somewhere just outside of St.Louis, like The Family Arena in St.Charles, which is just 30 minutes outside of St.Louis...they have rock shows there from time to time. Manson & Alice Cooper just played there a couple of weeks ago.http://familyarena.com/family_arena_info.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bodine Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Nope, Axl is serving a lifetime ban from St. Louis.I've heard this before, but banned by who??? Who are the people that could impose/enforce something like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rock4eva Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Is he allowed to run/drive through it on his way to another town? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManetsBR Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Yeah, I also heard that Axl Rose is banned from the city and that Guns N' Roses is forever prohibited from playing there. But how does that work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jman2000 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 ST. LOUIS SUCKS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themadcaplaughs Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 (edited) Cities can serve lifetime bans against someone. Even though Axl was found not guilty, it obviously went through the proper authorities to have him banned from the city. How is that enforced? I honestly do not know, but I sincerely doubt there is some alarm that goes off when Axl enters the city borders I'd even wager a good dollar that Axl has been in the city a few times. I think it is more along the lines that if Axl were to show up in a public event, get arrested, or pulled over in St. Louis, he'd probably have to spend some time in jail and/or pay hefty fines. I could totally be pulling this out of my ass, but I think I've read that Jim Morrison was banned from the city he was in when "exposed himself." The riot in Montreal was probably just as bad a riot, but it could not be argued that it was incited by Axl. If I remember correctly, the band played the minimum amount of time they were supposed to. Axl was upset over the sound system or his voice or some shit and non threateningly ended the show. Although Philly had some skirmishes, those who were there said that it was not really a "riot" as much as just a very hostile environment, and although it was at the last minute, Axl went through the official channels to cancel the show.St. Louis was a completely different story. Axl stopped the show to attack a fan (all of which is on tape). Edited July 3, 2013 by themadcaplaughs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Sabbath Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 No, I really doubt they will, and you can blame Stump for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dariablue Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 No, I really doubt they will, and you can blame Stump for that.Pretty sure Axl shoulders more of that blame. What do you mean he was found not guilty? He plead guilty - unless I'm remembering things very wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coma16 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Considering GNR Facebook just posted that concert you never really know. I like how they aren't hiding from their past anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tat2d1 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 (edited) No, I really doubt they will, and you can blame Stump for that.Pretty sure Axl shoulders more of that blame.What do you mean he was found not guilty? He plead guilty - unless I'm remembering things very wrong.http://www.feelnumb.com/2009/12/13/guns-n-roses-riverport-riot-fuck-you-st-louis/http://loudwire.com/axl-rose-musician-mug-shots/I'm pretty sure he ended up paying a $50,000 fine, but inciting a riot would've put his ass in prison. Edited July 3, 2013 by tat2d1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shotgunblues1978 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 St. Louis does suck. It is a turd on a piece of shit's asshole. Only thing it has going for it is being Duff McKagan's defacto hometown (King of Beers and all) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fergus Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Axl if I am not mistaken was on probation because of St-Louis not because of the other riots.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rock4eva Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Cities can serve lifetime bans against someone. Even though Axl was found not guilty, it obviously went through the proper authorities to have him banned from the city. How is that enforced? I honestly do not know, but I sincerely doubt there is some alarm that goes off when Axl enters the city borders I'd even wager a good dollar that Axl has been in the city a few times. I think it is more along the lines that if Axl were to show up in a public event, get arrested, or pulled over in St. Louis, he'd probably have to spend some time in jail and/or pay hefty fines. I could totally be pulling this out of my ass, but I think I've read that Jim Morrison was banned from the city he was in when "exposed himself." The riot in Montreal was probably just as bad a riot, but it could not be argued that it was incited by Axl. If I remember correctly, the band played the minimum amount of time they were supposed to. Axl was upset over the sound system or his voice or some shit and non threateningly ended the show. Although Philly had some skirmishes, those who were there said that it was not really a "riot" as much as just a very hostile environment, and although it was at the last minute, Axl went through the official channels to cancel the show.St. Louis was a completely different story. Axl stopped the show to attack a fan (all of which is on tape). But if filming was banned for the show which is what caused the riot, then who was filming the incident?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanudo19 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 the guy from last time would come back and piss axl off again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dariablue Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 No, I really doubt they will, and you can blame Stump for that.Pretty sure Axl shoulders more of that blame.What do you mean he was found not guilty? He plead guilty - unless I'm remembering things very wrong.http://www.feelnumb.com/2009/12/13/guns-n-roses-riverport-riot-fuck-you-st-louis/http://loudwire.com/axl-rose-musician-mug-shots/I'm pretty sure he ended up paying a $50,000 fine, but inciting a riot would've put his ass in prison.Not necessarily. Vince Neil killed someone and he's walking free. Strange how if he wasn't guilty he had to pay a $50k fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerage5 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Cities can serve lifetime bans against someone. Even though Axl was found not guilty, it obviously went through the proper authorities to have him banned from the city. How is that enforced? I honestly do not know, but I sincerely doubt there is some alarm that goes off when Axl enters the city borders I'd even wager a good dollar that Axl has been in the city a few times. I think it is more along the lines that if Axl were to show up in a public event, get arrested, or pulled over in St. Louis, he'd probably have to spend some time in jail and/or pay hefty fines. I could totally be pulling this out of my ass, but I think I've read that Jim Morrison was banned from the city he was in when "exposed himself." The riot in Montreal was probably just as bad a riot, but it could not be argued that it was incited by Axl. If I remember correctly, the band played the minimum amount of time they were supposed to. Axl was upset over the sound system or his voice or some shit and non threateningly ended the show. Although Philly had some skirmishes, those who were there said that it was not really a "riot" as much as just a very hostile environment, and although it was at the last minute, Axl went through the official channels to cancel the show.St. Louis was a completely different story. Axl stopped the show to attack a fan (all of which is on tape). But if filming was banned for the show which is what caused the riot, then who was filming the incident??The footage is the house feed or some other proshot source, not sure which. Either way it was a "legit" source, not fan footage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts