action Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 12 minutes ago, Len B'stard said: Nice to see you gradually growing a sense of humour glad you noticed. how else to react to someone telling me "to listen to my favorite pedo" than by laugh at it. but you mistake it with humour. I laugh with you, since everytime I see a grown up show such passive aggressive behavior, which most of us have outgrown after kindergarden, I can't help but wonder what kind of silly little man you must be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Towelie Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 (edited) This is nothing new and has been in public domain for years, but this has been twisted beyond belief by the media to look a lot worse than it really is. If you want to believe the gutter press then be my guest, but for those with an ounce of critical thinking, read on.... I've read comments questioning why he wasn't arrested for owning illegal sexually explicit material.... ummmm... perhaps because he didn't own any??? The only thing that was found by authorities during the Neverland raid consisted of two art books that are widely available, even the US library of congress owns a copy, you can even buy it on Amazon. Both of these books were gifts from fans, one of them had an inscription on the inner sleeve, the other wasn't even opened. The material in this book is in no way pornographic. These are some of the pictures from the book: Now this regurgitated article has been put up by the online equivalent of the National Enquirer, a trashy site called Radar Online, who have a long history of being in cahoots with the police department who investigated Jackson. The prosecutor Rob Zonen was pretty much humiliated in court in the 2005 trial for trying to pass off these art books and perfectly legal pornography as something more sinister. Here is a picture that Radar Online put up, blocking out the crotch area on photos that are not actually explicit, trying to imply that they are. RadarOnline's version: Here is the actual photo, from a book that deals with the life and artistic work of James Bidgood: As you can see, there is quite a marked different between the two images. It infuriates me, how it is so easy for a bitter prosecutor to leak flimsy "evidence" which would never hold up in a court of law, to manipulate public opinion. The media laps it up as it's good sensationalist click-bait and yet nobody stops to consider the credibility or integrity of these articles. No court would ever allow such a manipulation of the facts, but people don't see that, they would rather blindely trust whatever the gutter press tells them, than consider that the courts give a more fairer and balanced account of what really happened. Edited June 21, 2016 by Towelie 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 (edited) Quote glad you noticed. Thank you, must be the heightened levels of intellectual perception that result from discourse with someone of your obvious genius Someone clearly doesn't want this romance to end! Quote how else to react to someone telling me "to listen to my favorite pedo" than by laugh at it. Probably in the same way one might react to uptight fans of popstars getting their knickers in a twist over an offhand facetious comment I'd imagine. So yeah, laugh at it. Quote since everytime I see a grown up show such passive aggressive behavior This has certainly been a fruitful discussion, now I'm getting a psychiatric evaluation...and all for the price of an internet connection, this is brilliant Quote which most of us have outgrown after kindergarden What about feelings of betrayal from popstars, what age do we grow out that then Skipper? Quote I can't help but wonder what kind of silly little man you must be I dunno Doctor, i was hoping you could tell me! How many kinds are there? Edited June 21, 2016 by Len B'stard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bandanaman Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 I'm sure he was a pedophile. There is like 1000 rumors about it. He was a celebrity and all kind of shit and if you are a millionaire you will get sued easier and blah blah. But c'mon, no one gets sued that much if you really live like a normal human. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooker Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 I call malarkey on this, if as the article states, he owned and possessed such material it would have been evidence in his trial. As Towelie touched upon, it seems to be blown out of proportion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.