Ridin' the Nightrain Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 (edited) I can't listen to 2002 bootlegs. He sounds awful. It's depressing seeing/hearing your idol like that.I'd rate his voice like this:86-89 = His peak. Perfection. Nothing beats his live singing from this time.91-93 = Even though he did have his off days and blew out his voice, he still sounded amazing at times.2006 = Awesome. When he's on form, he blows away the bad performances of the UYI era, but he still can't match his peak in the UYI era. 2002 = Absolutlely awful. Edited October 26, 2006 by Slash's Appetite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brock landers Posted October 26, 2006 Author Share Posted October 26, 2006 His WORST day in 91-93 is better than his best day with that helium sounding crap in 02. 06 is a different story, but i guess the question i have is what the hell was wrong in 02 and was this the reason he stopped the tour and went away for basically another 4 years? Did he have some sort of vocal surgery in that time too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longpig Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 I think the point of this was "what happened between 2002 and 2006 that makes him sound a lot more like 1992 in 2006 than he did in 2002". It's not about picking out certain concerts to "prove" that his voice was better in a certain year!!Plus how many times has this piss-poor argument been had!?!Some people like his "fucked voice" e.g. in Tokyo 1992, some people prefer it now, 1986-1990 was the best etc... etc... his voice is sounding pretty great nowadays that's what's important about that.So any ideas how his voice improved so much - is fitness really that important to someones voice (obviously he'll be out or breath if he runs about, but surely the rasp isn't affected)?LP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feconroses Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 I can't listen to 2002 bootlegs. He sounds awful. It's depressing seeing/hearing your idol like that.I'd rate his voice like this:86-89 = His peak. Perfection. Nothing beats his live singing from this time.91-93 = Even though he did have his off days and blew out his voice, he still sounded amazing at times.2006 = Awesome. When he's on form, he blows away the bad performances of the UYI era, but he still can't match his peak in the UYI era. 2002 = Absolutlely awful.exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kobbeltvedt Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 and if your going to compare rq's you have to use the second half here is invasion 06:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLm8niwgMvQdo u hear whoes singing when his out of breath?Mickey from 02...SO thats the reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brock landers Posted October 26, 2006 Author Share Posted October 26, 2006 I think the point of this was "what happened between 2002 and 2006 that makes him sound a lot more like 1992 in 2006 than he did in 2002".EXACTLY, i wish i could have stated that better to begin with, but thats the question i am asking! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leisure Rules Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 Paris 92...Download it. GNR reaching their peak in the 90sPEACE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOOSIER GUNZ Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 I think the point of this was "what happened between 2002 and 2006 that makes him sound a lot more like 1992 in 2006 than he did in 2002".EXACTLY, i wish i could have stated that better to begin with, but thats the question i am asking!Answer:Health and Technology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmygod Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 Axl's voice:1988-1991 > 2006 > 1992-1993 > 2001-2002Axl's voice was screwed for most of the illusions tour, especially in Tokyo. He was obviously at his best in 1988-1991 though. agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssiscool Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 i like the 1992 era best i just like how he can change his style so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leigh-Rok! Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 Paris 92...Download it. GNR reaching their peak in the 90sPEACEThe first Guns show I ever saw...! Albeit a borrowed tape from a friend... :confused2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 I really don´t think his 2002 show was shot, please people listen to "The Blues" from Pittsburgh 02 and tell me that is not amazing. His voice doesn´t has the rasp, but he seems like he has infinite breath, i don´t think he holds the screams as long now as back in 02. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssiscool Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 I really don´t think his 2002 show was shot, please people listen to "The Blues" from Pittsburgh 02 and tell me that is not amazing. His voice doesn´t has the rasp, but he seems like he has infinite breath, i don´t think he holds the screams as long now as back in 02.but overall it was terrible in 2002 there are exceptions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 I really don´t think his 2002 show was shot, please people listen to "The Blues" from Pittsburgh 02 and tell me that is not amazing. His voice doesn´t has the rasp, but he seems like he has infinite breath, i don´t think he holds the screams as long now as back in 02.but overall it was terrible in 2002 there are exceptionsYeah and i don´t want so defend him, i really thought Rir 3 was a great concert for the atmosphere, but i so much dislike axl´s voice.In 02 it was better, but i don´t have many boots from that, just some single songs from different shows.He just seems like a totally different singer in 02, in rio it was weak, but i think 02 there were other things goings on. Inidianna Rose, who I really resepect for his good posts, did even say that Axl did sing without the rasp on purpose which might be true. I don´t know, although i can´t see his reasons for it.I really love the chicago 92 concert, i think his voice is just spot on, although some songs like sweet child could have been a bit cleaner sung.I also love his 06 voice but sometimes he sounds a bit too "weak" (don´t know how to describe it) to me, there would be one verse where he sings very high pitched, and then in the next one it´s full with strength.For me it seems like he can now decide how much power he wants to put into a scream and thats ok, even great if it gives us a whole great tour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F*ck Fear Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 In 2002 the highlights were, The Blues, and Live And Let Die. Those screams in LALD were fucking amazing. Check Albany. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martoine Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 the rock in rio 3 intro scream to jungle sent chills down my spine... then i was almost in tears because the singing was so bad... if it is true axl wanted to sing without the rasp i wonder what his motives for this were... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MYWORLD Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 In 2002 the highlights were, The Blues, and Live And Let Die. Those screams in LALD were fucking amazing. Check Albany.You took my example, And trust me the boots don't do justice to the live performance of it, If that says anything. Really the whole albany show wasn't bad, I liked Hammerstein better overall. But I cannot complain at all about Albany 02, I just wish their was an Albany 06, or 07. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunkyMonk Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 Inidianna Rose, who I really resepect for his good posts, did even say that Axl did sing without the rasp on purpose which might be true. I don´t know, although i can´t see his reasons for it.i remember that post. he was spot on with that i think. saving his voice for recording and such... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormscull Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 (edited) inland invasion, especially KOHD and his parts of my michelle, was almost him back to his best, IMO Edited October 27, 2006 by cormscull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts