Is it safe to say that Axl has destroyed the GnR name??
#16
Posted 07 December 2008 - 08:44 PM
#17
Posted 07 December 2008 - 11:36 PM

Willkommen in der Dunkelheit.
#18
Posted 08 December 2008 - 12:16 AM
I digress... the point is, Axl's never been a great innovator or a great musical genius or lyricist. He wrote from the heart - often a very naive and idealistic heart, mind, which made the songs more endearing. But Axl's J.D. Salinger-like seclusion has given him an air of self-importance, like he wants people to think he's a misunderstood genius, even if - truth be told - he never wanted people to believe that at all and just needed "some time all alone" for himself. The industry doesn't work like that -- if you alienate yourself from your old bandmembers, become a recluse in your mansion: you're a misunderstood genius. That's how they label you (Hughes, Salinger, Malick - they all got the label).
Axl's problem is that he isn't a misunderstood genius, he's just a really talented rock n' roll frontman who had personal issues that he obviously needed time to deal with, but his silence created a myth surrounding the music as well as the personality, and the years of seclusion have created lofty ambitions that could have never been met. At the end of the day, Chinese Democracy is just a good rock n' roll album - ambitious, yes; not life-changing, not a pioneering album. It sounds like Guns N' Roses, for the most part, but that's not enough for people who have waited almost two decades. Axl, whether he wanted to or not, created a myth around himself that wasn't accurate; and in his failure to live up to this myth, he has delivered what most people will consider - despite its consistent quality - to be a disappointment.
It makes people ask: if all this time he was just making a Guns N' Roses album, why the long wait? Why alienate all the other bandmembers? If his plan all along was just to update their sound a bit, but not really push boundaries or go full-on crazy (and trust me, nothing here is that musically off-the-wall), why the long wait? Why the silence? Why the myth? Why the hype? It creates an unavoidable sense of questioning and doubt that this album can't survive, no matter how good it is. Drug the GN'R name through the mud? No. Created questions for most people as to why the last 17 years went the way they did? Yes. Chuck Klosterman had the right idea.
And I just want to add that I'm not saying it's a bad album. It's a very good album. It's probably the second-best GN'R album overall, and the most consistent of all the albums. But that doesn't change what I've mentioned above, which is why I believe it has basically been written off by non-fans as a good album, but also a non-event.
This post has been edited by Estranged Reality: 08 December 2008 - 12:22 AM
#19
Posted 08 December 2008 - 12:23 AM
This post has been edited by FunkyMonk: 08 December 2008 - 12:23 AM
#20
#21
Posted 10 December 2008 - 09:41 AM

Axl's Appetite is not GN'R
#22
Posted 10 December 2008 - 10:48 AM
#23
Posted 10 December 2008 - 11:08 AM
#24
Posted 10 December 2008 - 05:36 PM
The name should have disapeared the moment Axl was the only original guy left.

#25
Posted 11 December 2008 - 11:40 PM
#26
Posted 14 December 2008 - 03:13 PM
Slash Guitarist, on Dec 10 2008, 05:36 PM, said:
The name should have disapeared the moment Axl was the only original guy left.
And should have been changed to Axl's Joke Fest. That's what I call them now.
Slash, Duff, Axl, Matt, Izzy, Gilby, and Steven. That is and always will be Guns 'n' Roses.
#27
Posted 14 December 2008 - 11:02 PM
Government spokesman Qin Gang
#28
Posted 15 December 2008 - 07:11 PM
#29
#30
Posted 17 December 2008 - 03:09 AM
Quote
The name should have disapeared the moment Axl was the only original guy left.
+1
This post has been edited by Coltrane: 17 December 2008 - 03:09 AM

Axl's Appetite is not GN'R


Sign In
Register
Help


Back to top
MultiQuote






