Counterfactual history. Historians love doing it. It's basically answering the question "What would have happened if this event would have had this different outcome?". I thought it would be a bit of fun to apply it to contemporary music history, particularly to rock star deaths. How would it have been if they hadn't died?
(I gotta say, I don't know much about some of these, so other more knowledgeable people should give their opinion)
- What if Freddie Mercury hadn't died?
It's pretty obvious that Queen were past their commercial success prime but they would have definitely been one of the touring circuit monsters. I'm thinking a Rolling Stones/Aerosmith/ACDC/etc scenario - legends, solid albums that cater to their fanbase, big tours. Maybe with a bit less inclination to the media side. However, could Queen have taken the U2 path, switching to a politically conscious voice? I kinda doubt it. While they - especially Mercury - have tackled socio-political issues in their lyrics, those were very general abstractions (e.g. The Miracle, Hammer To Fall etc). Plus, Freddie didn't take himself nearly as seriously as Bono does. I don't doubt though that they'd still be making and playing music. Good music at that.
- What if Kurt Cobain hadn't died?
I don't think it would have had much impact on the music scene. The grunge wave had already left its impact. All his death added to was his personal legacy. Cobain, probably even Nirvana, would have been less of a big deal, but the music, I think, would have taken the same path after them.
- What if John Lennon hadn't died?
I'm thinking more of a niche thing here. Kinda like Robert Plant did with his solo career. But in this case, probably more successful.
The following two are probably more interesting to think about.
- What if Jimi Hendrix hadn't died?
This is truly something to think about. The 70s with Jimi Hendrix. Basically all his work has been enormously influential. Who knows what he could have produced had he lived longer.
- What if Buddy Holly hadn't died?
The other 50s rock 'n' roll stars (except Elvis) didn't really matter that much after the decade was over. But Buddy Holly had a talent for innovation far above any of them. Could a true counterpart to the Beatles in America, who could actually hold his own to them have made a difference? Less Beatles-mania? Less of everything that lead to?
There's a whole bunch this could be applied to - Elvis (and by 'not died', I mean 'not died and kept making music'), Bob Marley etc.
I might add:
- What if Syd Barrett's brain hadn't died?
No 70s Pink Floyd. I seriously doubt they would have achieved fame with the kind of music they did in the 60s. And without them, would their kind of music been as prominent as it was? Specifically (and joking), I mean, how much would the average of all rock tracks lengths would have decreased. And seriously, how would the world of rock guitarists would look like today without the influence of Gilmour and what he did in Pink Floyd?
Please - thought-out replies, not drivel!