No Drugs on CD Why?
#1
Posted 03 November 2009 - 01:25 AM
Why do think that is? Is it good or bad thing?
There is no Mr. Brownstone or Bad Obsession on CD. At some point I thought Better might be the rehab song on CD, not really convinced now.
#3
Posted 03 November 2009 - 01:43 AM
We could have predicted this 7 years ago, as much as I think of him as one of the few quintessential rock stars the world has seen he was never much of a junkie. We know he's had a few drunken rages, but if Axl Rose has a drug problem I'd say he's been doin a pretty good job of hiding it

#4
Posted 03 November 2009 - 01:43 AM
The album is all about Axl and it wouldn't make any sense to write about drugs basically.
#6
Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:04 AM
I'm not really sure what I think about the lack of overt drug/drink references. The songs are loose enough to cover just about anything really.
I wonder what Axl's take on this whole prescription pills issue is.
#7
Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:15 AM
If any old the old guys were still writting lyrics about drugs, booze, and strippers they would look right old losers in my book, still acting like they were in their teens hahaha
#8
Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:18 AM
You won't find heroin and yeast infections here!
----
However I do have a feeling, through all of the interviews, that Chinese Democracy II will just be vicious, nightmarish, take no prisoner type stuff.
#9
Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:47 AM
Maybe CD II will bring back the stds and crack anthems.
#10
Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:42 AM
#11
Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:09 AM
#12
Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:20 AM
emilus_, on 03 November 2009 - 09:42 AM, said:
No.
I think the subject matter had to change both with age and also with the direction of where Axl wanted to take the band.
If the scope of Axl's vision of Gn'R remained with drugs / girls / alcohol etc... then maybe he wouldn't have clashed with Slash and the old guys as much.
I think the direction of the music took Axl away from that kind of subject matter, at least in the same sense as the earlier work.
The reference to drugs are more reflective on CD. They seem in the past or about other people. So the intensity is not there to get the same kind of songs as brownstone and Bad obsession, because in these songs the events were much more recent or actually still going on when the songs were written. So I think there are references but in a much different context or from a different perspective.
LP
I know a strange one could change all of this...
#13
Posted 03 November 2009 - 06:08 AM
and how on earth do you consider better a 'rehab' song?
#14
Posted 03 November 2009 - 08:26 AM
It's a reference to somebody. I'd have to put my money on Erin or Stephanie if I was a betting man.
It'd be nice to hear Axl's explanation of what the songs are about but I doubt he's going to do that possibly due to stupid fucking lawsuits.
This post has been edited by Crowebar: 03 November 2009 - 08:28 AM
#15
Posted 03 November 2009 - 08:26 AM
cocaine in the hall,"
There's a drug reference for you. I think that Axl is in a different time in his life now (obviously) and drugs don't play the part they may have at one time. Even this lone reference is given in a song that's written from the perspective of looking back on things and things change. Cd is by far the most layered, matured effort yet and as it should be; there's no reason do keep doing the same thing. Drugs, it seems, are not part of the current influence and at this stage of his life, I would actually be worried if they were.
This post has been edited by mcalldp: 03 November 2009 - 08:27 AM
__________________________~I saw the Damage In you~__________________________


Sign In
Register
Help



Back to top
MultiQuote
