Fan Reviews of RIR
#1
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:46 PM
#2
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:49 PM
#3
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:50 PM
That was one of the reasons I thought they needed an album to tour, and people got all bitchy with me over it, but how can he play the new songs at big shows without the album out?
#4
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:52 PM
#5
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:52 PM
Just dissapointed.

Willkommen in der Dunkelheit.
#6
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:53 PM
Nightcrawler, on May 27 2006, 09:50 PM, said:
That was one of the reasons I thought they needed an album to tour, and people got all bitchy with me over it, but how can he play the new songs at big shows without the album out?
Yeah, but they could have played at least "Used to love her" or TWAT, not that super-generic setlist
#7
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:54 PM
By the way,Did anyone find that the sound levels in this gig was completely fucked up cus i felt like i wanted to beat the backstage sound man with a stick....Anyone else notice this????
#8
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:58 PM
#9
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:58 PM
You obviously have no interest in the new band, so why put us through the boredom of your blanket criticism.
You lot have fucked up memories. In the 'good' old days, the band was absolutely shi$ live at times. I went to gigs where Izzy and Duff were off their faces and stumbling around with little clue of what was happening. I also went to shows where Axl sounded like Mickey Mouse in water one moment, then a deep growling mess the next.
Robin was great tonight, his only crime in your blinkered eyes is not being Slash.
Go watch Bon Jovi.
#10
Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:59 PM
Dragoon77, on May 28 2006, 01:53 AM, said:
Nightcrawler, on May 27 2006, 09:50 PM, said:
That was one of the reasons I thought they needed an album to tour, and people got all bitchy with me over it, but how can he play the new songs at big shows without the album out?
Yeah, but they could have played at least "Used to love her" or TWAT, not that super-generic setlist
Yeah, but did they play the songs the played well? I didn't see the show.
They are probably trying to really get the songs they are playing polished, the band hasn't toured much together. Not making excuses, I'd love to hear them play different stuff, GNR has such a deep catalogue, I'm curious why Axl isn't using more variety of old songs, you're right.
#11
Posted 27 May 2006 - 09:00 PM
I fucking enjoyed it either way, Robin, Ron and Richard's solos were awesome, just a shame the sound mix was bad.
EDIT - and i didnt hear one mess up from either guitarist all night, or tommy, or dizzy, or brain.
This post has been edited by mr-fukaji: 27 May 2006 - 09:01 PM
#12
Posted 27 May 2006 - 09:01 PM
Matty Boy, on May 27 2006, 06:58 PM, said:
me too, although i wouldn't say it sucked, just it was nothing like being there in NY
lol, and i hate the sound guy

You got it all locked up inside?
#13
Posted 27 May 2006 - 09:02 PM
Matty Boy, on May 28 2006, 03:46 AM, said:
Yeah, I think you're kinda right. OK, the soundmix being awful wasn't the band's fault, BUT:
- no new songs
- only 16 songs alltogether (with the setlist normally consisting of 18 songs, RiR III had even 20 songs!)
- no Axl rant, no information concerning the release of CD
- encore being cut short ("Dizzy, play Paradise!"): I didn't even know why such a short encore, because
Axl seemed in good spirits
- no special guest
- especially in Rock in Rio, which was said to be very important to Axl, I would have expected ANYTHING
unusual, which would make this gig a special show (remember the moving closing speech in RiR III?), but: there was NOTHING different than in any other show
I think Axl just missed a great opportunity to offer the general public something new.
#14
Posted 27 May 2006 - 09:03 PM
you're the same douche that thinks ron sucks, get a clue.
and how could you feel cheated after watching a FREE show?

#15
Posted 27 May 2006 - 09:03 PM


Sign In
Register
Help


Back to top
MultiQuote


