GNR 1991, on Jun 12 2007, 02:58 AM, said:
Estranged Reality, on Jun 11 2007, 11:19 PM, said:
Dead Flower, on Jun 12 2007, 01:36 AM, said:
Y'know, you're probably not far wrong, ER.
Axl seemed kinda nervous when he started the story about the tequila. And he seemed in a really good mood when the crowd erupted with laughs and cheers. Whoever wrote that article on gnr.com might have wanted to reassure him even further.
While it was a pretty funny story, I think the reaction was really more about the crowd showing their appreciation in Axl actually communicating with us. He's got such a natural charisma and charm, it was great to see him use it.
There was nothing but love for Axl in the crowd all night, imo. I think Axl picked up on that, and he seemed really sincere when he came back out on the stage after Paradise City to thank the crowd.
Hopefully he'll eventually realise that not everyone is 'out ta get him' and be willing to share his music with us again.
That's the side of Axl I've missed most on the past couple tours - part of the reason he used to be such a great, great frontman was his crowd interaction, and it seemed like he gave such little of it. The very little interaction he did offer seemed all routine - e.g. the "I sing one, you sing one" for KOHD - so if it's true that he's starting to interact more with the crowds, I'm all for it. It doesn't mean he has to go off on immature rants, but just talking to the crowds in between songs and telling anecdotes like he used to creates a very personal atmosphere and is much better than just singing a couple songs, disappering off stage, then reappearing for a few more songs and repeating this process throughout the night.
Used to be? He's still a great frontman, as far as I'm concerned.

It's hard to rate him as a frontman now because the main thing I think when I'm watching him these days is:
It's Axl Rose! He's a legend. A rock icon. Having been a GN'R fan during the "silent" era, and becoming obsessive over the band's history and watching so many old performances, it's amazing seeing him up on stage again. You can't take your eyes off of him. He could be sitting in a rocking chair singing Dr. Seuss and people would still be in awe because it's Axl Rose.
But if he hadn't been a rock icon in his past, and his 2006 comeback was his FIRST foray into music, I don't think I'd feel the same. His stage presence these days isn't as strong, and it's not just an age thing. The charisma and earnestness that made me consider him a great frontman has disappeared. I think he's a good frontman now, but it's nothing compared to how he used to be. People use hyperbole and claim his voice is "better than ever" - naw. Anyone who's listened to live shows from the early '90s knows his voice is pretty weak in comparison. His falsetto and higher register vocals are better than ever, so on songs like
Sailing from Wembley, he sounds fantastic. But ask him to extend the deep rasp like he used to do every night on
Sweet Child and he wouldn't be able to. Those opening screams these days on
Welcome to the Jungle are long shrieks, but he used to let out deep raspy banshee wails (VMAs '88). But, again, that's part of what makes it so amazing seeing him perform these days. His voice represents all the excess and self-destruction of that era. He has kind of ruined his voice and that thin off-key rasp is appealing because you're always reminded of all the shit the guy has been through over the years: the epitome of rock n' roll. I still love watching him perform simply because it's a wonder to behold and you know that you're watching a rock god. Like I said, he could just sit around on stage for two hours singing non-GN'R songs and it would still be awesome just because of who he is, what he represents for so many people, and because of the whole nostalgia factor.
This post has been edited by Estranged Reality: 12 June 2007 - 02:08 AM