Jump to content

British Politics


Gracii Guns

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, DieselDaisy said:

C9yh837XoAA3jJu.jpg

There's an episode where Harold wants to be local Labour candidate, with dreams of being the next Harold Wilson, but it ends up they won't have him cuz he's a rag and bone mans son.  The party of the working man won't have a working man.  Its really good, you should watch it if you've got a minute.  You get it too, in terms of what they're talking about because you know your history and that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Len Cnut said:

There's an episode where Harold wants to be local Labour candidate, with dreams of being the next Harold Wilson, but it ends up they won't have him cuz he's a rag and bone mans son.  The party of the working man won't have a working man. 

 

That will be right. One of the biggest cons in British political history is that of the Labour Party being ''the party of the working classes'' - especially in recent times. Blair was at Fettes then Oxford. Corbyn went to a prep school before attending a grammar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said:

That will be right. One of the biggest cons in British political history is that of the Labour Party being ''the party of the working classes'' - especially in recent times. Blair was at Fettes then Oxford. Corbyn went to a prep school before attending a grammar. 

I believe the episode goes 'we are looking to get away from the cloth cap image'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't over 'till the fat lady sings. Brexit Lords will frustrate bill through ''wrecking'' amendments: https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/constitution/house-lords-reform/news/106286/tory-peers-launch-bid-block-no-deal-bill and https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/04/tory-peers-accused-wrecking-tactics-bill-delay-brexit

Lords would've to sit for 24 hours every single day until Saturday before bill can be passed back to the Commons haha.
 

Edited by DieselDaisy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Dazey said:

Woo hoo!!!! Suck it Boris! :lol: 

You may be too premature in your celebration (I assume you're happy about Benn's bill being passed in its second reading in Commons, or maybe about the defections reducing Boris's majority, or both perhaps?). There are now 102 amendments in Lords introduced by Brexiteering peers - each must be voted on twice so over 100 hours of continuous proceedings.

Edited by DieselDaisy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said:

You may be too premature in your celebration (I assume you're happy about Benn's bill being passed in its second reading in Commons, or maybe about the defections reducing Boris's majority, or both perhaps?). There are now 102 amendments in Lords introduced by Brexiteering peers - each must be voted on twice so over 100 hours of continuous proceedings.

 How long has he been PM? He created this mess. He might still have some of what he wants. But it's a nightmare for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said:

You should visit Highgate Cemetery where you'll find,

Highgate_Cemetery_-_Karl_Marx's_grave,_H

For sure. People even travel to your country to foment revolution!

The tombs not unlike Speer's ascetic to my untrained eyes?

One cant help but but consider the resources and labour that went into this tomb monument, eh? Paid for by CPGB. Its certainly not a monument fit for some lumpenprole. But theres the need to portray power, the ability to defend the revolution I guess? And theres the idea of 'beauty' as a tool for promoting socialism... And just look at that handsome beast! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said:

It is only a mess because Parliament refuses to implement the democratic will of the populous. 

Did the populous say they wanted to leave the EU with no deal? Eh, no.

Besides, it has been a mess every step of the way from when the idea of a referendum first was conceived to Boris Johnson's ham-fisted attempts at forcing his way. Just a terrible mess. I feel for the Brits who have been lied to, misled, and now have to endure this farce. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SoulMonster said:

Did the populous say they wanted to leave the EU with no deal? Eh, no.

Besides, it has been a mess every step of the way from when the idea of a referendum first was conceived to Boris Johnson's ham-fisted attempts at forcing his way. Just a terrible mess. I feel for the Brits who have been lied to, misled, and now have to endure this farce. 

What about the poor fuckers like me who weren't mislead and knew this was all a colossal clusterfuck from day one?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SoulMonster said:

Did the populous say they wanted to leave the EU with no deal? Eh, no.

The United Kingdom said they didn't want to remain in the EU. Three years later and we are still in the European Union. And pertaining to current opinion - you are a big admirer of opinion polling,

EDnNiWqXYAANQ_S?format=png&name=4096x409

 

Just now, Dazey said:

What about the poor fuckers like me who weren't mislead and knew this was all a colossal clusterfuck from day one?  

Such is democracy. You don't always get what you want. I hated Blair but endured it stoically enough because Blair won by a landslide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said:

Such is democracy. You don't always get what you want. I hated Blair but endured it stoically enough because Blair won by a landslide. 

Different scenario entirely. If the 1997 election was for a lifetime appointment I suspect that you would have been a little more animated about it. 

Also the referendum result was far from a landslide. Had it been a 2/3rds majority or even 60:40 in favour then I think this would be very different.

Edited by Dazey
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DieselDaisy said:

The United Kingdom said they didn't want to remain in the EU. 

But Parliament isn't stopping a Brexit (and hence being in conflict with the outcome of the referendum 3 years ago), they are trying to stop a hard Brexit, which it is unlikely the majority of the populous wants. So you are wrong in saying that the Parliament refuses to implement the Democratic outcome of the referendum, they are just trying to do it in a not mind-blowingly stupid way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dazey said:

Different scenario entirely. If the 1997 election was for a lifetime appointment I suspect that you would have been a little more animated about it. 

If the referendum result was the reverse, 52% for remain, I would believe the British public to have made the wrong decision, and freely discuss the reasons why I believe they have made a mistake, but I would not ask for the referendum to be re-run, nor question its legality. My opinion would have been on the losing side. Such is democracy. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...