Jump to content

Is it worth it for GNR to release new music?


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, AncientEvil80 said:

I didn't say they're too old for music. I meant without a combination of different factors (youth, hunger, anger etc), the creativity lacks quality. Usually. 

Sometimes, not always. You can be angry or hungry at any given age. And without those factors you can still make good music, I think. Also in this genre of music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DieselDaisy said:

GN'R are now a deluxe clothing range disguised as a rock band.

Is it even disguised anymore?

I think mygnrforum.com should close the site and put up this message and only consider reopening it once the band release some music. Name and shame the fuckers - call em out for exactly what they are - corporate whores who couldn't be any further removed from the spirit of AFD if they tried.

Edited by Towelie
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Live Like a Suicide said:

At this point, i hope they trial some new songs in South America and come back on the last NA leg with them. I know it's too optimistic for Guns, but i'm sick of seeing fashion shit, lol. Give us something good.

In the YouTube era, I don't think it is wise to perform new songs before release. The limited sellability of recorded music would be hurt even more.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, default_ said:

If GNR plan on keepin the stadiums full they better release some before it gets to the point of playin fuckin weddings again. Cause it may take 5 or 6 years but the buzz of a reunion will be over.
After that whats going to be their secret weapons to fill the stadiums again? Izzy "Who?" Stradlin? As much as important the guy is, Izzy doesnt help filling stadiums. 

And about music... It depends on the artist or band, AC/DC and Black Sabbath for exemple, their last efforts were great and fans gave em a warm welcome. 

They could fill stadiums In Europe and arena's In the U.S. for the rest of their lives without ever releasing another thing, IMO.

Edited by ironmt
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gnrcane said:

In the YouTube era, I don't think it is wise to perform new songs before release. The limited sellability of recorded music would be hurt even more.

The Foo Fighters have been performing half of their upcoming album for months now and I don't think it's gonna make them sell less copies. 

Personally I wouldn't have done it because once it comes out the novelty has already worn off of half of the record, but I don't think it's gonna make them sell less copies, maybe the opposite because there's a buzz around the new album since they debuted the first song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Men with that amount of disposable income can set up a studio in their mansion with top gear for less than what they earned for 1 show. They don't need a record company, their management could arrange distribution of the record. The only other investment would be time. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tonsco said:

A couple of personal thoughts here:

1. There is MORE than 1 good 'GNR' albums worth of material when you look across the solo catalogue of Slash/Duff alone and that's before the songs got the Axl / Clink touch.

2. The less you write/record/release music the quicker the quality drops of it. 

You gotta make a bad record every now and again to unlock a great one.... but you have to be MAKING records to do that.

I completely agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tonsco said:

A couple of personal thoughts here:

1. There is MORE than 1 good 'GNR' albums worth of material when you look across the solo catalogue of Slash/Duff alone and that's before the songs got the Axl / Clink touch.

2. The less you write/record/release music the quicker the quality drops of it. 

You gotta make a bad record every now and again to unlock a great one.... but you have to be MAKING records to do that.

Exactly, just fuckin' crack on with it, see what comes out.  But then you have the 'gotta make a bad to unlock a great' mentality and thats like the furthest pole possible from the 'perfectionist' thing that some 'artists' have, whether it's Axl Rose or Dr Dre or whoever, which to me really is more to do with some kind of insecurity and being overly concerned with how others perceive you or this fuckin' stupid quixotic notion of 'it's not like it sounds in my head maaaan', it's just fuckin' bollocks, you're either compelled to make and perform music or you're a twat who likes to spend long nights in front of a mixing desk twiddling with your fuckin' knobs for years on end.  Don't get me wrong, take 6 months, take a fuckin' year if you like...but fuckin' release something at least, you ain't fuckin' Wagner, you ain't Dante Alighieri, it's pop music.  Axl waited so long the fuckin' industry died :lol:

And predictably you have these long waits from your Dre's and Axls and what comes out the other end when they finally do pull the trigger?  A bag of shite.

Edited by Len Cnut
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neil Young probably has as many average albums - and a few stinkers - as great albums now, but it is never uninteresting following his career, and there is always something to look forward to. If Neil releases an average-poor album, you merely wait a year and there will be another one out that may be much better. It may even be a masterpiece like Le Noise. That was just 2010.   

His last album was terrible haha. Peace Trail. Crikey!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DieselDaisy said:

Neil Young probably has as many average albums - and a few stinkers - as great albums now, but it is never uninteresting following his career, and there is always something to look forward to. If Neil releases an average-poor album, you merely wait a year and there will be another one out that may be much better. It may even be a masterpiece like Le Noise. That was just 2010.   

His last album was terrible haha. Peace Trail. Crikey!

Also, albums don't live and die based on how they are received at the time, there's plenty of albums out there that don't get their dues for 30 plus fuckin' years after their release.  But then if you're looking to make money or whatever that ain't gonna be music to your ears.  Which i why i was putting 'artists' in brackets earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Len Cnut said:

Also, albums don't live and die based on how they are received at the time, there's plenty of albums out there that don't get their dues for 30 plus fuckin' years after their release.  But then if you're looking to make money or whatever that ain't gonna be music to your ears.  Which i why i was putting 'artists' in brackets earlier.

I do not believe Peace Trail will be rehabilitated in thirty years somehow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DieselDaisy said:

I do not believe Peace Trail will be rehabilitated in thirty years somehow!

But albums like Raw Power by The Stooges which was in Bargain Bins 3 months after release it bombed so bad...and now it gets the fuckin' remaster and boxset treatment and documentaries made about it and that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, default_ said:

Yeah, just like Axl was doing before the reunion. lol

What terrible numbers. Axl should be ashamed. Again, they don't need to release a single thing to continue to be successful and make money. I agree In the sense that we would all like to hear new material, but they will remain successful without It.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Democracy_Tour

Edited by ironmt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh the majority of bands never manage to compete with their past... But there's always the exception to the rule, Johnny cash is the famous choice for an artist written off BLT to come back with a great album with Rick Rubin.

I'd also argue that artists like Madonna etc. Don't really fall in line with bands like gnr or Metallica or Maiden etc. Because they write albums while Madonna etc write a handful of singles and the rest of the songs are generally there to fill in the gaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tom2112 said:

Yeh the majority of bands never manage to compete with their past...

People often say that, but so many of my favourite bands didn't make their best albums until halfway through their career. Of course it's subjective, but many musicians grow as songwriters and you can hear that on the albums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RONIN said:

Music being recorded NOW by this group would not be interesting to me in the slightest.

Basically - clear the damn vault. Win/win situation for them and the fans. Easiest possible solution to putting out new material. No need to write new music - that's just an exercise in futility given that this band hasn't written music together in the same room since the 80's and Axl's bizarre need to write lyrics only after stitching together hundreds of different jams and riffs is simply doomed to fail as it has since the 90's.

Agree with everything else but I'm curious, why would music recorded now not interest you in the slightest? 

100% agree with clearing the vault.  

Don't agree that writing new music would be an exercise in futility.  Why shouldn't they be able to write new music?  It's what at least 2 of them have been doing for a living these past 20 odd years, with a variety of other artists (some of whom they may not have shared any chemistry with) and coping with all that that entails: differing dynamics, personalities, agendas, abilities. 

They could probably knock out at least half-way decent songs in their sleep by now.  Axl is another matter, but he seems to be an inspired man these days, so I'd give him a chance. 

They don't need to be in the same room together.  Again, at least two of them (different two this time) have been making music either by writing their bits in hotel rooms or on the road, and sending the parts over the internet because hectic schedules prevent getting together in the same room, or by assembling bits and pieces to make a song.   No, it's not an organic, or a magical, or romantic process, but it is how many, many musicians make music these days.  And it can be done successfully.  On the other hand, they may even just go old school and get in the same room together.  

Either way, I don't see why they shouldn't be able to write new music, given it is what they do, generally speaking.

 

Edited by MyPrettyTiedUpMichelle
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Towelie said:

Saw this on an MJ board I visit, and thought you could apply it pretty much word for word to GNR.

What do you reckon?

Original thread: http://mymjjforum.boards.net/thread/114/worth-legendary-artists-release-albums

 

that's UTTER bullshit argument

it shows only that whoever wrote that NONSENSE knows ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT PRINCE

Prince kept releasing VERY GOOD MUSIC (sometimes GREAT) pretty much till the end of his life

what a load crap argument from someone who doesnt know SHIT

and please dont tell me about "impact" because i couldnt care less about impact. WHO THE FUCK CARES ABOUT IMPACT? all i care about is axl, izzy, slash, duff and a drummer (hopefully steven) getting together to release NEW MUSIC again. i am pretty sure it will have a HUGE IMPACT ON ME and on everyone that loves GNR, and i couldnt care less if the entire wolrd doesnt notice it!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...