Jump to content

GN’R Greatest Hits Vinyl - release Sept 25th


Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, rocknroll41 said:

Between this and the supposed UYI reissue next year, I have a feeling we won’t get a new album anytime soon.

The foolish kid in me wants to believe that both of the above are actually “warm ups” to drum up excitement for a new album, but deep down, I know I’m wrong.

Queen productions used to go on about not flooding the market with product. I don’t necessarily think that’s a bad thing, so long as a new album isn’t released alongside something else at the same time.

With the Greatest Hits being released in September, the hope would be for another years delay on a potential UYI box set like Appetite had and get a new album out to coincide with the tour dates next year. The thought of having nothing for another year + is quite disappointing. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, zigzagbigbag said:

Russ, I totally get where you are coming from and agree with nearly everything you said on this forum 😄 But please don’t let me down and don’t buy this shit. 😉😄

As you do I got thousands of records and in the past I considered my self as a „completionist“ when it comes to a lot of bands in the past. But when I got older I came to a point where I asked myself more often do I really need this?! I know, sometimes its hard to not pull the trigger. For me it’s even harder when it comes to GNR, my „first real love“ which kinda still lasts after 30 years like an old marriage 😄 See, I was one of the idiots who bought the L&L box on its release day and guess what: I hardly opened the box three times since then 😄 

After this whole L&L shit I promised myself I will never ever spent a cent on GNR product unless its a quality realease and its reasonably priced. And this Greatest Hits LP isn’t .

Instead of spending 40€ on this crap I will support young bands and buy three cool albums with fresh and new music by them, maybe even nice DIY releases. 

By the way: Do you really own all GNR releases? All original EPs, all 12“ and all 7“? I do not. I still do miss some and will e.g. rather spent 20€ on a mint 1991 YCBM 12“ than 40€ on a shitty 2020 Greatest hits album. 

Please dont get this post as an offend. I highly expect you to know how it’s meant. 😃

To be clear, I didn't mean to say that I have everything by then on vinyl. I meant to say that I have every song they've officially released on vinyl. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DownUnderScott said:

What did Slash have against SFTD ? I haven’t actually heard that one?

From my recollection.... He hated the movie it was made for with passion. He also wanted to put his own spin on it but Axl wanted the song to sound more like the original which is silly. Why not use The Stones version then? And then there's Paul Tobias' overdubs. Slash hated that too. He didn't want to do the cover and he didn't like the final product. "That's the sound of the band breaking up," he said in VH1 Behind The Music in 2004. 

Edited by Sisyphus
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sweersa said:

This band is a joke.

Wish my favorite band released new material.

With that being said, I’m thankful for the Village leaks. That was basically an EP with many, many extras.

I feel the same way.  To me it's our CD box set.  And sadly it's probably the last new material we may ever hear.  Thanks Rick!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Coma16 said:

I may be in the minority but I think it's one of their best covers. Took major fortitude to cover a song like that as well.

I think it's fine too really. I have no problems with it, but like a lot of things GNR do, the context in which it happens alters views and perceptions on it. 

Same with this greatest hits vinyl reissue really. If most bands do it it would be shrugged off as a minor incident with an 'ah well, if you want it, buy it' attitude. Because it's GNR we all see it differently- as part of the wider concept of their general behaviour, coloured by so many other things both past and present,  it sits with people in a different way. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Sweersa said:

One of my many unpopular opinions is the GN'R cover of Sympathy for the Devil is better than the the Rolling Stones version.

With that being said, I was never a big stones fan. Too light and playful for my taste. I like it harder.

With you on that. Axl sounds unreal on it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Sweersa said:

One of my many unpopular opinions is the GN'R cover of Sympathy for the Devil is better than the the Rolling Stones version.

With that being said, I was never a big stones fan. Too light and playful for my taste. I like it harder.

I agree and I get yelled at by friends about it a lot lol 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sweersa said:

One of my many unpopular opinions is the GN'R cover of Sympathy for the Devil is better than the the Rolling Stones version.

With that being said, I was never a big stones fan. Too light and playful for my taste. I like it harder.

Me too in a way. I love The Rolling Stones a lot but anything with Axl's vocals is just pure awesomeness. I generally prefer all the Guns N' Roses covers to the originals due to Axl's delivery. The band helps too, of course.

Edited by Sisyphus
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love GNRs cover, tasty guitar licks, great drumming by Matt but Axl oversings it quite a bit. 

The sound is vastly streamlined as well. The voodoo atmosphere of the original is completely lost, in favor of a fairly by-the-numbers hard rock sound. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, EvH said:

I love GNRs cover, tasty guitar licks, great drumming by Matt but Axl oversings it quite a bit. 

The sound is vastly streamlined as well. The voodoo atmosphere of the original is completely lost, in favor of a fairly by-the-numbers hard rock sound. 

Nicely put.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Coma16 said:

It's not a thing to get mad at. The lable is releasing something for a small select group of fans. If you like it then buy it, if not then don't. Cant imagine this would get in the way of another release (lol).

Bingo - it’s not a bad thing at all. I don’t actually own the CD version and have always looked out for it in vinyl. So this arriving on gold splatter vinyl is just awesome.

Although I did wonder how many other examples there were of something like this getting pushed out at the same time (or near) as any prospective new material and couldn’t think of any....but as this is a vinyl only release, it’s tiny volumes in the grand scheme of things so it shouldn’t be an issue.

Arguably a new release would also see a boost in GH so the more mediums that is available on the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rodri99 said:

Lol, they didn't play Shadow of your love for more than 30 years and now they released it is part of the "Greatest Hits".

 

To be fair, it was a bigger hit than Ain't It Fun, Since I Don't Have You and Sympathy For The Devil.

I really don't get the appeal of this re-release though... it's an overpriced record full of songs you can already get on vinyl, that the band initially tried to block from release because it's a poor 'Greatest Hits' collection. There's not even anything interesting included like a live track or demo or (lol) new song. It's a completely useless release. :shrugs:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Gordon Comstock said:

 

To be fair, it was a bigger hit than Ain't It Fun, Since I Don't Have You and Sympathy For The Devil.

I really don't get the appeal of this re-release though... it's an overpriced record full of songs you can already get on vinyl, that the band initially tried to block from release because it's a poor 'Greatest Hits' collection. There's not even anything interesting included like a live track or demo or (lol) new song. It's a completely useless release. :shrugs:

I suppose it’s purely about putting something out which they can probably do in relatively small volumes, get good markups and collectors etc will buy?

Plus - TSI and SFTD ain’t so easy to get on vinyl!!

Edited by DTJ80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Gordon Comstock said:

I really don't get the appeal of this re-release though... it's an overpriced record full of songs you can already get on vinyl, that the band initially tried to block from release because it's a poor 'Greatest Hits' collection. There's not even anything interesting included like a live track or demo or (lol) new song. It's a completely useless release. :shrugs:

It's probably useless for the majority of the diehards. GH has been very successful though and very popular among the casuals, and there are casuals who are also vinyl fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...