Facekicker

24 minutes ago, -W.A.R- said:

assuming this is talking about elementary - high school i think thats way too young to "find yourself"

if i was parent i would never allow it with my child because they are more than likely confused or crying out for attention

if they still want to be woman when they are adults then they are free to do as they please

Its called indoctrination, or conditioning. 

Just now, arnold layne said:

There is more to that story. 

A temp agency put me in a situation where I could not succeed in. 

How so?

7 minutes ago, axlslash said:

I'm in favor of that. I went to a college with co-ed bathrooms. As long as there's a door where you can get your privacy (which I want regardless of gender), unisex bathrooms would make life a hell of a lot easier.

It is as if they want to ignore this solution so they can get their self-imposed segregation which only serves to reinforce their "freak" status and sense of victimhood. They'll probably object to a "non-binary bathroom" (what is wrong with unisex?) and the trans students will still want to sneak into the women's toilets. 

Fuck it, this is insane degeneracy 

I might as well just walk into the female toilet in Starbucks, get thrown out and then sue them for millions for discriminating against me because I identify as a woman. Doesn't matter that I'm not dressed as one because anyone can be anything they want today and don't have to follow the gender stereotypes. 

Society has become a carnival of the deranged.

Just now, Gracii Guns said:

Wild speculation based on the amount of times this comes up in transgender conversation. This is of importance to them. As I said, you'd have to ask a trans person for their reasoning. 

It's like lifelong gay partners who are finally getting married. Gay people mentioned that they weren't allowed to legally marry a few times (I don't know if they presented graphs, charts and statistics to their government too), and then they legalised gay marriage. 

If I had a statistic, what would it say? "100% of trans people we surveyed claim that a non-binary bathroom would make living with a condition they didn't choose easier?" 

What is wrong with a unisex toilet? 

 Nice cover

16 minutes ago, Gracii Guns said:

I've a feeling they'd find it easier to pee or poop if they knew that they weren't at risk of getting the shit kicked out of them, or claims made against them, by ignorant or nasty schoolchildren. 

So you are saying that these attacks and claims solely happen in regular bathrooms and that somehow they will stop because the people involved are incapable of doing the same thing outside of a bathroom?

Any statistics to validate these claims or is it just wild speculation?

4 minutes ago, Gracii Guns said:

You'd have to ask a trans person, but I assume it's more of a social difficulty than a physical one. They aren't disabled, but do have a condition which makes life really difficult. A little provision like this might make a massive impact. 

Let's remember that 50% of transgender people commit suicide. I don't see any harm in institutions caring for the people they serve, so fewer of them are inclined to kill themselves. 

 

So you are saying that due to this disease they find it easier to poop or pee if the sign on the door says women instead of men?

6 minutes ago, Gracii Guns said:

I'm confused, how is "protecting childrens' innocence" got anything to do with this? 

Presumably this applies to high schools. Where teenagers go through puberty, encounter their sexuality. A small minority realise that they were born with a disease which means their sex doesn't align with their gender. These people communicate that their condition makes conventional bathroom usage difficult. 

What's different between this and putting in wheelchair ramps, or signs in braille?

And at this stage in their lives, when children can access hardcore porn and weapons, what has other peoples' bathrooms got to do with their innocence?  

I'm a bit confused by your statement - are you saying that trans people have a disease that makes it difficult for them to go to the bathroom like everyone else? You believe they are disabled like wheelchair users and blind people?

PIERRE, S.D. - South Dakota would be the first state in the U.S. to approve a law requiring transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond to their sex at birth if the governor signs a bill passed Tuesday by the state Senate.

The Senate voted 20-15 to send the bill to Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard, who initially responded positively to the measure but said last week he'd need to study it more before making a decision.

Advocates say the bill is meant to protect the privacy of students, but opponents say it discriminates against vulnerable adolescents. CBS affiliate KELO in Sioux Falls reports that those opposed say that in addition to the likelihood it will lead to bullying, they also question the constitutionality of the bill and fear it will cost the state millions in lawsuits.

Under the plan, schools would have to provide a "reasonable accommodation" for transgender students, such as a single-occupancy bathroom or the "controlled use" of a staff-designated restroom, locker room or shower room.

Republican Sen. David Omdahl urged other legislators Tuesday to support the bill to "preserve the innocence of our young people."

Democratic lawmakers and some Republicans unsuccessfully opposed the measure in the Senate.

The American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota and Human Rights Campaign have been vocal in their opposition to the measure and have called on Daugaard to veto the legislation.

"History has never looked kindly upon those who attack the basic civil rights of their fellow Americans, and history will not treat kindly those who support this discriminatory measure," Chad Griffin, the president of the LGBT-rights organization Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement Tuesday.

Transgender advocates have also criticized comments made by some lawmakers, including Omdahl, about transgender people.

"I'm sorry if you're so twisted you don't know who you are," Omdahl said at a recent event when asked about the bill. "I'm telling you right now, it's about protecting the kids, and I don't even understand where our society is these days."

Several states have looked at addressing gender and public facilities in the past several years. Late last year, the city of Houston was recently home to a bitter public fight over nondiscrimination rights that focused on transgender people's use of bathrooms.

But South Dakota would be the first state in the nation to put such a measure into law, said Joellen Kralik, a research analyst at the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The Legislature's passage of the bill is "shocking," said Thomas Lewis, a transgender student in his senior year at Lincoln High School in Sioux Falls, the state's most populous city.

"At this point, I'm hoping that the governor has a sense of humanity and the common sense not to write this bill into law," said Lewis, who is planning to attend college in Minnesota. "I am so glad to be leaving soon. I can escape the oppression that my home state wants to put on me."

Supporters say South Dakota's plan is a response to changes in the Obama administration's interpretation of the federal Title IX anti-discrimination law related to education. Federal officials have said that barring students from restrooms that match their gender identity is prohibited under Title IX.

Glad to see that common sense still prevails in some states. 

Is this who replaced the bnp?

Yup

Fucking students. Send them all off to war in some godforsaken hellhole

Can we all just agree that Britain would be better off without the Britain First crowd.

The bottom end of the gene pool.

Those aren't my words. They're Axl's. Right from this forum I believe.

And most GNR fans today were not alive in the 80's.

Just look in the Axl chat #1 and his response to fans expectations

I don't work for you. Just cuz u think so don't make it true.

And

Your misconceptions and fantasies along with your misguided sense of entitlement don't dictate my actions.

Axl Rose owes the fans nothing. He doesn't work for you.

Everyone REMEMBER to bring LIGHTERS! Lets all use LIGHTERS to hold up during November Rain instead of the UGLY cell phones. Little flames looks so much more beautiful.... OLD SCHOOL 4 Eva!

JOIN THE 21st CENTURY - THE 80's ARE OVER!

Lmao

Yeah but Joe Public seems to react badly when they realise Axl isn't a 130Ibs skinny rat anymore.

I'd say some of the 80's crew will be shocked. Maybe it reminds them in an uncomfortable way of their own aging.

Is Axl an uncomfortable mirror for the 80's kids?

You know the types, people in their late 40's and older who followed GNR almost three decades ago but kind of lost touch with the band since 1993.

They tend to forget that the Ritz 88 was nearly 30 years ago, to them as a fan it was a few years ago.

How do you think they will react when Axl appears in front of them and 30 years of aging suddenly dawns on them?

Everyone REMEMBER to bring LIGHTERS! Lets all use LIGHTERS to hold up during November Rain instead of the UGLY cell phones. Little flames looks so much more beautiful.... OLD SCHOOL 4 Eva!

JOIN THE 21st CENTURY - THE 80's ARE OVER!

In or out of GNR he is a joke.

I can't believe a grown man his age deliberately acts and looks like such an idiot.

He has no shame and is a bigger attention whore than a teenage slut with new fake tits.

Britain First - I'll cheer on anyone who kicks lumps out of those vermin. Xenophobic, racist, trash.

Practice makes perfect

No offence Power ge but I know 120Ibs girls that drink more than that on a night out let alone across an entire day

That's not a lot at all. I guess you're just not much of a drinker.

Someone add DJ Ashba to the word filter for the love if god.

He was about as welcome as herpes and seems twice as hard to get rid of.

Was that what you were drinking a shitload of?