Jump to content

pbj_jam

Members
  • Posts

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pbj_jam

  1. release the entirety of the leftovers under the condition they contain vocals or an album like so; CD,Shacklers,Better,Atlas,IfTheWorld,TWAT,Catcher,Perhaps,Riad,TheGeneral&Monsters,Sorry,SOG,Hardstool,Prostitute

    closing the book with the intended followup to illusions as deus intended.

     

    New material with Axl riffing ontop of tophats stuff, no bueno and no comprendo for mesa

     

     

  2. saying Kiss is cringe, is as cringe as saying GNR is Co0l, criiinge. Kiss dig the Melvins, so they alright in my book, also business men of a caliber Axl could only dream of ever reaching, Kiss is the boomer version of a rnr band, Gnr is zoomer rnr

     

    and apparently highly down to earth nice guys to boot, a rarity in the industry..

    • Like 2
  3. The only album since that I anticipated and waited for, and it would take literal years until it clicked for me. Helped seeing them in 10'. At this point it has its place among other gnr, I prefer the album over demos, Axl's fingerprint until it was taken away. Overall really solid album, that judging by now, seems almost too plain and safe imo. However for the longest time its a great record over a period of 10years listening to nothing but CD when it came to guns music, its here to stay.

     

    What hinders it becoming a white type album is exactly it being dated at release and dumbed down, again imo.

    Closing, some of my fav cuts are on that monstrosity.

    • Like 1
  4. 8 hours ago, alfa75 said:

    The CD album itself is pretty hit or miss lyric wise IMO, but actually so was Illusions (BOB, Bad Apples, Shotgun blues, GITR, etc). AFD/Lies was close to perfect but TAY is arguably a bit weaker than the rest, and OIAM gets a lot of hate, but subject matter aside, I think it's well written.  Of the new stuff, Absurd was obviously not a high point, HS was simple but effective, and the others I think have plenty of interesting lyrics, especially Monsters. TG is let down by just repeating the same things over and over even if as one part of the song, it works.  I am convinced he always always wanted to outdo his previous self, but that is a lot of pressure to put on oneself, and if your career started with AFD, good luck.  

    I know you were not comparing, did not mean to imply it. Patton is great at what he does, but lyrically I prefer Axl.

    I think we're very much in agreement as your'e kinda proving my point. For sure he's mostly been hit or miss, and like you say it shows post AFD, eventually ending up with CD that was, as you put it, a mixed bag. I think he ended wanting too much, pleasing his own ego and the fans, while seeing himself as some prolific and profound songwriter of his era, again AFD is the proof in the pudding. He does/did provoke a very raw and emotional picture with his lyrics, and obviously as a vocalist from a writing pov, is at the very top. He should invoke some emotion inside and he does.

    • Like 1
  5. 3 hours ago, alfa75 said:

    Couldn't disagree more. Love the lyrics on Perhaps, TG, and Monsters. I think Mike Patton is much more into using his lyrics, which are often nonsensical as just an extra sound rather than any way of communicating anything. I'm a huge FNM fan for the record.

    Well both statements can be true, apples and oranges at the end of the day, I could open a new can of worms and list another side project of his, yes I called fnm his side project. For the record I wasn't making a comparison between the two. 

    The comment originally stems from Axl's subpar work from the CD era when compared to Illusions imo.

  6. 12 minutes ago, bumbleslash69 said:

    I think CD as a whole sort of reinforces that Axl isn’t much for a “songwriter” in the traditional sense (Dylan, Waits, etc.) There are a lot of songs with repeating verses, inaudible lyrics, and that more or less just sound cool and don’t go anywhere. He can write the hell out of a song though in terms of melodies and vocal notes. He’s a rock singer above all else. I almost feel his intentions are to use his vocals like an instrument vs creating lyrical masterpieces. 
     

    that being said, Monsters certainly does deliver on all fronts. It’s some of his best work in terms of writing and vocal performance. It’s pretty impressive a guy can go from writing a song like Shotgun Blues to Monsters within 10-15 years. 

    I agree big on the lyrical side, if only he did too and focused on making the best with what he has, know your place and reign it in. Instead he tries awfully hard to be profound but ends up worse instead. I still think he could write good/enjoyable lyric, instead it was a struggle and only pain, hence we get overload of seymour drivel.

    Think I wrote earlier back he only writes from experience, would indicate he stopped late naughts there were no more sad thoughts and experiences, not a slight on his person btw, but he's been done musically a long time.

    • Like 1
  7. A thought experiment I did during fading in n out of the general fever dreams, was to wipe the slate clean MIB style, dump every gnr song in a Bucket, then pick up the one song which epitomized and embodied the gnr character and personalities behind it. The results were shocking, spoiler alert, The General and Monsters was what I picked.

     

    You have the main characters doing the brunt majority work so, it boils down to.

    Axl and his megalomania over the top theatrical perfomances and split personalities with outbursts of mania, racing thoughts of victimhood.

     

    Slash and his unwavering build and grind, that completely harmonize with split personalities. Slashs personal signature being all over the journey and not pure noodlefest, reigned in until conductor lets the beast loose. 

    Culminating with Monsters dirty sleaze and singalong sensibility, with the meanest bridge, thx Baz and the pure gnr soul leaving our bodies for the anthemic outro. Digest as needed..

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...