Jump to content

maynard

Members
  • Posts

    8,400
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Posts posted by maynard

  1. 7 hours ago, Pedrolg said:

    Nah, no need to retire. Axl is a capable singer still, imo he is just a bit to proud and hopeful with his ability right now. He needs to drop those songs down a notch and will be able to sing them just fine. 

    There is no way around it, there are two things that are devasting for male singers: singing at the top of their range and using drive. Axl's done both throughout his career, and his voice paid for it. Bon Jovi and Brian Johnson both did that and adapted for years, it's a matter of trading "wow" moments for a consistent, decent performance.  

    What caught my attention was that even the low "all that I wanted" part sounded bad and Axl was clearly struggling. The song is difficult I know but still... The guy needs rest. And lessons. And a completely reworked set list. None of that will happen and he will keep sounding like shit. It's a shame. Now that Slash is back it would have been really cool if Axl sounded like vintage Axl. He sounds like shit. 

  2. Axl always sounded shit on Better but damn he keeps getting worse. I can feel the struggle from here, it's just too demanding for him. The high scream parts, the low "all that I wanted" that leads to the final solo and the weak Mickey helium voice at the end are cringe-worthy and painful to watch. He sounds like an amateur. He should consider retiring some songs. Or just retiring from singing.

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, SoulMonster said:

    Of course it would be a U2 album if he had the rights to call it that. It would be a very different album, though. It might not feat into the band's overall chronology. Fans would feel betrayed and butthurt. They might even be so upset they'd refuse to call it a U2 album, as if that would change anything.

    I think being butthurt is not really the case. People would see the U2 name and the new musicians and just go "Well, it's REALLY just Bono and some new guys". It's a very logical reaction. Noel Gallagher is the heart and soul (and sometimes the voice) of Oasis but he knew calling his solo band Oasis would bee just stupid since there was no Liam... Axl was greedy and in his own disturbed mind, thought he was GNR. Time proved he was wrong. Slash is back and now they got some relevance and legitimacy back.

  4. 35 minutes ago, Derick said:

    Finally! Yes, same band, different lineup. Thank you.

    Can't believe I've been so wrong all this time. You saying "Wrong" really changed everything. Makes me wonder if that lineup was still around when would Stinson, Ashba and Bumblefoot, etc. decide to release CD2. What do you think?

    • Haha 1
  5. 24 minutes ago, withyourassintheair said:

    If you can't understand such a basic concept, I'm really not sure there is any hope for you.

    ACDC is still ACDC without Bon or Brian

    Marilyn Manson is still Marilyn Manson without John 5 or The Spooky Kids

    Local H is still Local H without Joe Daniels

    Black Sabbath was still Black Sabbath without Ozzy

    and Guns N' Roses was still Guns N' Roses without Slash, Duff, Izzy, and Matt.

    yeah but it is not REALLY GNR without them right? (4th attempt)

    • Like 1
  6. 1 minute ago, withyourassintheair said:

    Well if Bono, the legal owner of the U2 name, decided that it would still be a U2 album, it absolutely would really be a U2 album. I'm not sure why you struggle to comprehend such a basic idea. I think attempting to call others retarded is a coping mechanism for you since your obvious lack of intelligence makes you feel inferior.

    Yeah, but it would not REALLY be an U2 album, right? (this is my third attempt, hope you get it this time).

    • Like 1
  7. 10 minutes ago, withyourassintheair said:

    Let's say The Edge, Larry and Adam all quit the band but Bono, the legal owner of the name U2, was still working on the new album. Should he abandon the project and the name of the band that he founded, named, fronted and wrote most of the songs for, or should he work on replacing musicians who walked out so the fans can continue to enjoy Bono's life work. If you're not retarded I guess you understand...

    Still not REALLY an U2 album. Get it now?

×
×
  • Create New...