Lithium Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 I don't know, and I don't care as long as they play good music. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AxlsAngel Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 They all are important, but it seems more difficult to replace the vocalist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ffrankwhite Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 (edited) no such thing man...it's like asking what's the most importent part in a car? the wheel, the tires,the engine?you need all of them!exactly, thank you, what he said, bang on the money bands are predicated on chemistry, each member is key to the sound. the cult of celebrity has duped people into thinking that lead singers are it cuz they're the face, the voice and they're at the front and by that somehow you imagine that its all them but its not...never will be. thats why there are bands and not just solo artists all together. bands are a group of motherfuckers that need each other to be that entity. Edited December 5, 2007 by ffrankwhite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appetite4illusions Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Depends who the catalyst is. In every good band there has to be at least one, great bands have two which usually leads to problems down the road. In any band it could be the guitarist, the singer, the drummer, whoever takes the most prominent role within the band. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ffrankwhite Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Depends who the catalyst is. In every good band there has to be at least one, great bands have two which usually leads to problems down the road. In any band it could be the guitarist, the singer, the drummer, whoever takes the most prominent role within the band.OK then, how'd you explain The Who? (why is everything about The Who for me lately?!?! ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevdo242 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 The fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman24 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Singer, he's the one that is recognisable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UseYourAppetite Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 It's quite impossible to choose for me really so I'm not going to.The bassist and drummer seem to be very important to holding the band together though so maybe one of those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridin' the Nightrain Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 The fans.Haha bad attempt at being philosophical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNSNROSES513 Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 depends on the band. These kids where saying that no band has or needs a bassist. i voted singer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midnight Rambler Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 Nul vote, if therye a really great band, every member is integral. People might think a drummers not very important to a band but a drummer can change everything in a song just by changin the beat. Each member is equally important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peg Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 i would of voted bass, but every instrument melds the music together so null vote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roses Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 Whoever writes most of the songs is probably the key member.After that, it's the most charismatic or technically skilled member. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevdo242 Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 The fans.Haha bad attempt at being philosophical.Wasn't really being philosophical. I was just thinking of the shittest possible answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Satanisk_Slakt Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 Null vote. That is different from band to band, plus that I think it would be unfare to say that one is much more important then the others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bax Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 A band is a only as good as its weakest link, so whoever that is would be the most important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vogstar90_G'N'R Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 The vocalist or the songwriter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shootingstar Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 I voted guitarist mainly because the guitarist sets the tone for the rest of the group, and lyrics are usually written to fit over a riff, not the other way around.I also would say this is an unbiased opinion since I play guitar, drums, bass, keyboards, etc so I'm not favoring my instrumentAs I´m the vocalist in our band I have MANY times heard prejudiced comments about vocalists that really annoys me. First people seem to think that the singer mainly DON`T write music. At all. For example, after gigs ppl can come and speak with me saying "well mate that sounds really good. U´re a great singer. I loved that song [insert an particular song] with that mean guitar riff. Your guitarist must a genious"The reality is that I made that riff, the lyrics and the vocals. Then this person in general goes on "did you wrote the lyrics?"I´m just.. "yeah..." and he "wow". I play guitar, but isn´t as technically skilled as neither of the two guitarists in our band. Still I can manage to write things I´m not even able to play. But I don´t need that, and that´s not my job. the important thing is that my band mates understand me, and they do.Of all the prejudiced shit I´ve heard, I´ll be biased enough to vote the singer. Maby as some sort of revenge that I think I deserve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubbermade_baby Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 I voted guitarist... Woulda said vocalist but I saw a band the other day with no vocals and they were immense! Though, I do think it would depend on the band itself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roky Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 chris pitman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bucketslash Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 the songwritercan you imagine oasis without noel?what about the new songs of gnr without izzy?the who without townshendthe fact that pink floyd hasn't had a great album that doesn't include roger waters or syd barret?having said that, the guitarist cause they USUALLY(not always) write the songs, and usually have either the most musical theory training, and can add the most into other people's songs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slash Guitarist Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Everyone in a band is equal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Axl Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Everyone in a band is equal.IMO that is just WRONG to say.In bands there is ALLWAYS the leadsinger or leadguitarplayer and of course songrwriter who makes a band what it is.Would Duff be able to be as popular without Axl or Slash or Izzy?Or John Bonham without Plant and Page?Or John Deacon without Merucy and May?And it goes on and on.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lithium Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Or John Bonham without Plant and Page?You picked a bad example there, Chris. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Axl Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Or John Bonham without Plant and Page?You picked a bad example there, Chris.Sure he was great. But I don't think he would have be as big without Plant and Page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.