Jump to content

Guns n' Roses vs Rhydian


fred_carston

Recommended Posts

X-factor reject, he's not going to worry GNR on the chart. When he went on tour this year, he played to Student Unions. Not quite ready for Wembley yet.

And even if he does beat GNR, who cares? We're already winners for having an album this year.

The charts are often more a bidding war than a ranking of genuine sales.

I didn't know this, but it's not really surprising given all the dross that gets into the top 10. How do they do this though? Surely the chart has to have some kind of integrity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The charts are often more a bidding war than a ranking of genuine sales.

I didn't know this, but it's not really surprising given all the dross that gets into the top 10. How do they do this though? Surely the chart has to have some kind of integrity?

Where do you think that money goes? To the people who compile the charts, and it's not like they're about to say no just to keep the chart's integrity.

Obviously not every band/artist does it, so there is some element of truth in the charts. One example I can think of is the Christmas #1 spot, which is now taken by an X-Factor/Pop Idol etc. winner every year, regardless of any big releases by hugely popular and established artists. I remember one year, the winner got the top spot, the runner up came in at #2 and the Cheeky Girls got #3. Then came all the 'real' artists and bands. You really think outcomes like that reflect true sales figures?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The charts are often more a bidding war than a ranking of genuine sales.

I didn't know this, but it's not really surprising given all the dross that gets into the top 10. How do they do this though? Surely the chart has to have some kind of integrity?

Where do you think that money goes? To the people who compile the charts, and it's not like they're about to say no just to keep the chart's integrity.

Obviously not every band/artist does it, so there is some element of truth in the charts. One example I can think of is the Christmas #1 spot, which is now taken by an X-Factor/Pop Idol etc. winner every year, regardless of any big releases by hugely popular and established artists. I remember one year, the winner got the top spot, the runner up came in at #2 and the Cheeky Girls got #3. Then came all the 'real' artists and bands. You really think outcomes like that reflect true sales figures?

stop talking bollocks, just face facts that sometimes awful novelty music gets to number 1 because its really easy to sell to people. you cant buy chart positions otherwise vicky beckham would have had a number 1 solo single and she hasnt no matter how hard shes tried. people dont buy her music because they hate her

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The charts are often more a bidding war than a ranking of genuine sales.

I didn't know this, but it's not really surprising given all the dross that gets into the top 10. How do they do this though? Surely the chart has to have some kind of integrity?

Where do you think that money goes? To the people who compile the charts, and it's not like they're about to say no just to keep the chart's integrity.

Obviously not every band/artist does it, so there is some element of truth in the charts. One example I can think of is the Christmas #1 spot, which is now taken by an X-Factor/Pop Idol etc. winner every year, regardless of any big releases by hugely popular and established artists. I remember one year, the winner got the top spot, the runner up came in at #2 and the Cheeky Girls got #3. Then came all the 'real' artists and bands. You really think outcomes like that reflect true sales figures?

stop talking bollocks, just face facts that sometimes awful novelty music gets to number 1 because its really easy to sell to people. you cant buy chart positions otherwise vicky beckham would have had a number 1 solo single and she hasnt no matter how hard shes tried. people dont buy her music because they hate her

:huh:

I am not 'talking bollocks'- my boss at HMV told me this.

And you can't directly buy chart positions- I never said that. The record companies buy sales figures to guarantee a high chart position.

Edited by Axls Rocket Queen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Axl anticipated this epic showdown ten years in advance. That's why he wrote Rhiad and the Bedouins. He was too lazy to look up the proper spelling of Ryhdian's name, and when he was watching a rerun of X-Factor ten years later and realized the misspelling had occurred, he ordered Beta into the living room and yelled at her for 25.6 minutes about why the magical orbs didn't tell him this was going to happen. Then he locked himself in his room all night.

Edited by Estranged Reality
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, who the hell is this guy and what is X-Factor?

This guy was a contestant (not a winner) ona British "Talent show" called the X-factor, where basically half the country shows up, tries to get involved and the ones with some semblance of talent are collected and through a process of voting and elimination are gradually manufactured into money-spinning pop acts which are guaranteed the Christmas No.1.

Actually the only part the show's good for are the untalented people who show up at the beginning which are responsible for some of the funniest moments on TV. As Evidenced Here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The charts are often more a bidding war than a ranking of genuine sales.

I didn't know this, but it's not really surprising given all the dross that gets into the top 10. How do they do this though? Surely the chart has to have some kind of integrity?

Where do you think that money goes? To the people who compile the charts, and it's not like they're about to say no just to keep the chart's integrity.

Obviously not every band/artist does it, so there is some element of truth in the charts. One example I can think of is the Christmas #1 spot, which is now taken by an X-Factor/Pop Idol etc. winner every year, regardless of any big releases by hugely popular and established artists. I remember one year, the winner got the top spot, the runner up came in at #2 and the Cheeky Girls got #3. Then came all the 'real' artists and bands. You really think outcomes like that reflect true sales figures?

stop talking bollocks, just face facts that sometimes awful novelty music gets to number 1 because its really easy to sell to people. you cant buy chart positions otherwise vicky beckham would have had a number 1 solo single and she hasnt no matter how hard shes tried. people dont buy her music because they hate her

:huh:

I am not 'talking bollocks'- my boss at HMV told me this.

And you can't directly buy chart positions- I never said that. The record companies buy sales figures to guarantee a high chart position.

then with everything riding on CD im sure geffen would buy some serious sales figures. jerk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...