Count Drugcula Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Well, guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jekylhyde Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Aerosmith...I don't know why but I never got into Stones. I'm 25 so that might explain it. But I've always loved Aerosmith, since 1997 at least ...And I do like Keith's "solo" records. I guess I just can't stand Jagger's voice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin' Jack Flash Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Definitely The Rolling Stones.It's a little like choosing between The Beatles and Oasis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izzygirl Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Rollings... because of Keith, basically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MB. Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Easy, The stones ofcourse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bumble's Bridge Pickup Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Tough pick, because I'm not into either band Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsh327 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 We need an Aerosmith/Stones double bill to happen once in this lifetime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misch Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Definitely The Rolling Stones.It's a little like choosing between The Beatles and Oasis.This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Len B'stard Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 The Rolling Stones...because of Mick...and Keith...and Charlie...and Brian Jones...and Ronnie Wood...and Bill Wyman...and Ian Stewart...and Mick Taylor...and Bobby Keys...and Chuck Leavell....and all of em, beautiful bastards, one and all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon Comstock Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 Aerosmith, because they're awesome. And I never got into the Stones.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChineseDemocracy2004 Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 The Stones nick it for me. Love them both though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITW 2012 Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I can't believe anybody actually voted for Aerosmith. Maybe I'm just jaded though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBear Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 (edited) Stones have more great tunes. And more variety. Gotta go with the Stones, no question really.But Aerosmith have some killer tunes - can't do dirty bluesy hard rock much better than Back in the Saddle, Last Child, Sweet Emotion, etc. And Steven Tyler is still a badass, even on AI. Edited March 5, 2011 by KBear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velvet-Rose Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 (edited) Tyler > Mick JaggerKeith > PerryBut there is a much larger distance between Tyler and Jagger than there is between Keith and Perry imo, so I'll go with Aerosmith.Cant stand Jagger. Stones could have been great without him. Edited March 5, 2011 by Velvet-Rose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bacardimayne Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 As much as I dislike most of the Rolling Stones material, I can't deny that their greats are truly some of the best rock songs out there.Aerosmith has some good songs, but nothing in the same league as Gimme Shelter, Sympathy, Paint it Black, Wild Horses, etc. besides maybe Dream On. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelica Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I can't believe anybody actually voted for Aerosmith. Maybe I'm just jaded though?At least one of them was almost certainly voting for 90s and beyond Aerosmith, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mazifin96 Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Its a close call but Still The Rolling Stones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
collision-tammi Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 Like them both, but I prefer pre-1990 Aerosmith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmygod Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 lolwut?The Stones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Eyes Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 Stones stones stones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeroGNR Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 Aerosmith, of course! Though I do love the Stones greatly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daedalus Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 The Rolling Stoneshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCTgVITubkE&playnext=1&list=PLC62A850F0452145A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Sabbath Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLddJ1WceHQ/thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zint Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 Definitely The Rolling Stones.DefinitelyIt's a little like choosing between The Beatles and Oasis.Not for me. Beatles...hands down no question not even close no contest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Len B'stard Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 (edited) Definitely The Rolling Stones.DefinitelyIt's a little like choosing between The Beatles and Oasis.Not for me. Beatles...hands down no question not even close no contestI think Jumpin Jack may have (or maybe not, might be wrong) meant that as it's like choosing between the genuine article and a pale immitation. Edited March 18, 2011 by sugaraylen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts