Powerage5 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 21 minutes ago, James Bond said: Bummer! Well hey, it's still a mean Bond location you can cross off the list. I love sightseeing Bond locations. I checked off Miami International Airport on this trip too 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Bond Posted March 7, 2016 Author Share Posted March 7, 2016 I took pictures of several key spots from DAF when I was in Vegas. Sadly, DAF is the only film I can claim for my Bond sightseeing. I can certainly claim a lot of sightseeing for Superman II and Marilyn Monroe's Niagara however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerage5 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 I need to make a list of all my Bond sightseeing locations. Also not sure how to count some of them. Like, would the UN Building in NYC count? My other favorite to date is the canals in St. Petersburg. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Bond Posted March 28, 2016 Author Share Posted March 28, 2016 MGM says there's "no rush" for a negotiation deal and that they're happy to do 3-4 year gaps between all future Bond films. Are they trying to kill the franchise? Fuck MGM. Bye Daniel. http://debrief.commanderbond.net/topic/65352-mgm-007-films-to-come-out-on-a-3-4-year-cycle/#entry1330408 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerage5 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 14 minutes ago, James Bond said: MGM says there's "no rush" for a negotiation deal and that they're happy to do 3-4 year gaps between all future Bond films. Are they trying to kill the franchise? Fuck MGM. Bye Daniel. http://debrief.commanderbond.net/topic/65352-mgm-007-films-to-come-out-on-a-3-4-year-cycle/#entry1330408 I could live with 3 years, but 4 is pushing it. Stil, if we lose Craig because of more business mumbo jumbo, fuck MGM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Bond Posted March 28, 2016 Author Share Posted March 28, 2016 35 minutes ago, Powerage5 said: I could live with 3 years, but 4 is pushing it. Stil, if we lose Craig because of more business mumbo jumbo, fuck MGM. It really is. Three seems okay but there's a big difference with four years. That's only two films in a decade. How they sustain both the franchise and a new actor in the role with that? If we find out this year that we've lost Craig because of this, the thread title will once again be changed to something more appropriate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sturginho Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Did anyone watch "The Night Manager"? If so anybody notice how Pine orders a vodka martini in the casino? Think they may have been trying to hint at something there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerage5 Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 I'm currently on my layover in Shanghai en route to Tokyo. I watched the Chinese censored version of SPECTRE on the flight here from JFK. There were about 9 minutes of footage cut, thought you guys might be interested to hear about the changes: - The helicopter fight in Mexico City was severely shortened - Bond kicks Sciarro out on the first barrel roll and the pilot on the very next maneuver. - General censoring of swearing, along the lines of the shitty dubs you get in tv versions of some movies; "shit" replaced with "shoot", etc. My two favorites were when Q injects Bond with the nano blood Bond exclaims "Christmas!", and when M is in Tokyo and talking to Q on the phone he tells Q he is in "dire straits" if he can't say Bond's location - The post-coital scene with Monica Bellucci is re-edited; no Monica in lingerie - No eye-gouging by Hinx - One of the bigger ones - they left out the scene altogether where C informs M that Nine Eyes passed following the Cape Town attacks. - The train fight is cut down - No happy ending - the film ends with Bond and Swann walking off the bridge into the distance while M arrests Blofeld There may have been some smaller ones I didn't catch too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsh327 Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 The longest part would be planning everything out for the next movie. I'm surprised they're not planning to make the next one a part 1 and part 2 but they're probably not concerned with keeping Daniel Craig around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazyman Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 Guy Hamilton died. 93 years young. Also I haven't bought Spectre yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartbreakerWoman Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 Is From Russia with Love anyone else's favourite? Mine, ranked 1) From Russia With Love 2) Live and Let Die 3) Goldfinger 4) On Her Majesties' Secret Service 5) Thunderball Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seely Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/19/daniel-craig-is-done-playing-james-bond---but-will-tom-hiddlesto/ Daniel Craig, the actor who has played James Bond for four films, has reportedly told studio bosses he is "done" with the role. The 48-year-old is said to have turned turn a £68million offer from MGM studio to return as the British Secret Service agent for two more films. Craig, who last year said he would rather "slash my wrists" than agree to another Bond film, told bosses it "just wasn't what he wanted" despite bosses throwing "huge amounts of money at him", a source said. It comes after a bookmaker suspended betting on who will be named the next 007 after a large bet was placed on British actor Tom Hiddleston taking on the role. Craig, who has played Bond since 2005, has helped secure more than £2billion in box office revenues. He is reported to have been paid a total of £38million for the films in the franchise he has starred in - Spectre, Skyfall, Quantum of Solace and Casino Royale. Craig has now turned down an offer to return for two more films in a £68million deal that would have included endorsements, profit shares, and a co-producing role, an LA film source told the Daily Mail. "Daniel is done - pure and simple - he told top brass at MGM after Spectre," the source said. "They threw huge amounts of money at him, but it just wasn't what he wanted. "He had told people after shooting that this would be his final outing, but the film company still felt he could come around after Spectre if he was offered a money deal." After his comment that he would rather "slash my wrists" than agree to another Bond role, Craig later said he would agree to it "for the money". But the source said that a knee injury he suffered during filming for a scene in Spectre had helped him decide that "it was a journey with an ending". Meanwhile, a flurry of bets have tipped Hiddleston - the star of The Night Manager - to replace Craig, making him the 2-1 favourite. After a particularly big gamble, his odds plummeted to 1-2 and Coral suspended betting. Earlier this week, Hiddleston was reportedly spotted meeting with Bond movie director Sam Mendes and producer Barbara Broccoli. Luther star Idris Elba and Homeland actor Damian Lewis had been frontrunners for the job in previous months. Elba was priced at 9-1 and Lewis at 14-1 before betting was suspended. Poldark star Aidan Turner had 3-1 odds and Mad Max: Fury Road actor Tom Hardy was at 4-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 They should probably let the franchise rest for a few years and plan his replacement adequately. Bond - like Doctor Who - seems to scare actors away. None of them manage the long haul with any semblance of contentment except Moore; Connery of course was a reluctant passenger on You Only Live Twice and Diamonds Are Forever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 Y'know what never made sense about James Bond to me. In the films, everyone seems to know him! I mean what kind of a spy is that?!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 3 minutes ago, Len B'stard said: Y'know what never made sense about James Bond to me. In the films, everyone seems to know him! I mean what kind of a spy is that?!? They are basically cartoon films. The Harry Palmer films were done by Bond's creators as a sort of riposte to this; Saltzman seems to have realised that Bond was a bit ridiculous and wanted to do a more realistic alternative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 Just now, DieselDaisy said: They are basically cartoon films. The Harry Palmer films were done by Bond's creators as a sort of riposte to this; Saltzman seems to have realised that Bond was a bit ridiculous and wanted to do a more realistic alternative. And it shows if you ask me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Tom Hiddlestone is too...Cheshire Catish for me. Fassbender might be good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MillionsOfSpiders Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 (edited) It will be the first Bond film I ever watch if Tom Hiddlestone gets the role. Edited May 21, 2016 by MillionsOfSpiders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerage5 Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 20 hours ago, PappyTron said: Tom Hiddlestone is too...Cheshire Catish for me. Fassbender might be good. Fassbender is too big for the role nowadays. Plus he's already 39 - we'd only get two films out of him if they keep going with the 3-4 year cycle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Another question is, are they going to reboot it or continue with some of the unanswered stuff left over from Spectre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 26 minutes ago, Powerage5 said: Fassbender is too big for the role nowadays. Plus he's already 39 - we'd only get two films out of him if they keep going with the 3-4 year cycle. Well, Moore was 46 when he took on the role. Do you think that Fassbender is too big? I don't think that he's been in too much more big stuff than Hiddleston, has he? I must confess that I'm not actually a big fan of the Bond series, but does Hiddlestone strike you as Bond? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Georgy Zhukov Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 I think Hiddlestone will be good. I think he would be the best successor to Craig. Going down that path of Fleming's Bond that started with Dalton, perfected by Craig and was something Brosnan hoped to do but it was the 90's. Hiddlestone has the makings of the best Bond yet and as a Craig fan I am reluctant to say this. But I think he's the best choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Bond Posted May 22, 2016 Author Share Posted May 22, 2016 How to get Craig back for one more: 1) MGM needs to get their shit together. Lawsuits, finances, delays, strikes, etc... have all affected the Craig era. Find a competent distributor, hire a decent set of writers, and get back to doing films every two years. Take a look at Marvel! 2) Focus on story and less on the fifty locations and stunts. The less physical stuff Craig has to do, the better. That'll also help shorten the shooting schedule. He'll find it more appealing. There wasn't any ultra globe hopping in Casino Royale or Skyfall and look how well those turned out! The early Bond films exploited locations, whereas SPECTRE merely teased them. 3) Send a couple Brinks trucks to his house right now. Seriously though, my first two points stand regardless of the actor. The biggest shame if Craig is gone for good is the "what could have been" had we got a fifth film or had the SPECTRE rights been sorted out sooner. I think a new actor will definitely find a shorter shooting schedule and less action appealing which seemed to be the main problem Craig had with SPECTRE. I guess none of that really matters with the three/four year crap though. Fuck MGM. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 The only Bond actor who I feel did not get pissed off with being Bond was Moore. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsh327 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 24 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said: The only Bond actor who I feel did not get pissed off with being Bond was Moore. I don't remember Pierce Brosnan or Timothy Dalton pissed off about playing James Bond, even though with Dalton it ties into another "Fuck MGM" thing going on at the time and Brosnan got the gig. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.