Crash Diet Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 tI view the current incarnation of Guns N' Roses as a solo act. Some people get insulted by that but I can't view it any other way. If Axl gave the other band members a piece of ownership in the name, I may think differently. For me the only thing that is the same is Axl and the name of the band. There is nothing wrong with a solo act, artist do it all the time. Hell, I just traveled accross the country to see it live. But the situation with the current band fits every characteristic of a solo act, except the band name which undoubtably increases ticket sales. My opinion anyways.this
Recommended Posts