Crash Diet Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 tI view the current incarnation of Guns N' Roses as a solo act. Some people get insulted by that but I can't view it any other way. If Axl gave the other band members a piece of ownership in the name, I may think differently. For me the only thing that is the same is Axl and the name of the band. There is nothing wrong with a solo act, artist do it all the time. Hell, I just traveled accross the country to see it live. But the situation with the current band fits every characteristic of a solo act, except the band name which undoubtably increases ticket sales. My opinion anyways.this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roush Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Silly thread. Money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts