Jump to content

Quoting!


Dazey

Recommended Posts

What's wrong with the simple plain code like it used to be seriously? I mean if you want to edit a quote to just part of a long tree it's a right pain in the arse with all this stupid formatting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's wrong with the simple plain code like it used to be seriously? I mean if you want to edit a quote to just part of a long tree it's a right pain in the arse with all this stupid formatting.

Look, not everyone's going to like everything. Some people have said that they like the new quote function, other's don't.

Personally, I like that you're able to "split" quotes much easier to respond to just a single part of a post with the new system. With the old system, it involved messing around with the tags a lot. Now, you press enter twice at the end of a sentence from inside a quote, and you're able to split it in two. Try it out. :)

As I mentioned in the other topic, If you ever have any glitches when quoting, hit the BBCode switch QuAKpPN.png to get a stripped down editor where you can go back to the tags instead. It's the best I can offer, the reply box has been completely overhauled from 3.3.x and many glitches that plagued it are now gone. It's not possible to go back to it now and even if we could, I still wouldn't for that reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broski's suggestion of hitting enter a few times to "escape" a quote box that you're stuck inside of, just worked.

Not sure how many times I had to hit it- in between 2 and 5 times. I just started tapping enter to test his theory and next thing I knew I was outside the quote box. Yippy skippy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broski's suggestion of hitting enter a few times to "escape" a quote box that you're stuck inside of, just worked.

Not sure how many times I had to hit it- in between 2 and 5 times. I just started tapping enter to test his theory and next thing I knew I was outside the quote box. Yippy skippy.

It's twice... this is by design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's wrong with the simple plain code like it used to be seriously? I mean if you want to edit a quote to just part of a long tree it's a right pain in the arse with all this stupid formatting.

Look, not everyone's going to like everything. Some people have said that they like the new quote function, other's don't.

Personally, I like that you're able to "split" quotes much easier to respond to just a single part of a post with the new system. With the old system, it involved messing around with the tags a lot. Now, you press enter twice at the end of a sentence from inside a quote, and you're able to split it in two. Try it out. :)

As I mentioned in the other topic, If you ever have any glitches when quoting, hit the BBCode switch QuAKpPN.png to get a stripped down editor where you can go back to the tags instead. It's the best I can offer, the reply box has been completely overhauled from 3.3.x and many glitches that plagued it are now gone. It's not possible to go back to it now and even if we could, I still wouldn't for that reason.

Even hitting the BBCode switch and manually editing the quotes tends to leave large spaces in nested quotes, it's a mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's wrong with the simple plain code like it used to be seriously? I mean if you want to edit a quote to just part of a long tree it's a right pain in the arse with all this stupid formatting.

Look, not everyone's going to like everything. Some people have said that they like the new quote function, other's don't.

Personally, I like that you're able to "split" quotes much easier to respond to just a single part of a post with the new system. With the old system, it involved messing around with the tags a lot. Now, you press enter twice at the end of a sentence from inside a quote, and you're able to split it in two. Try it out. :)

As I mentioned in the other topic, If you ever have any glitches when quoting, hit the BBCode switch QuAKpPN.png to get a stripped down editor where you can go back to the tags instead. It's the best I can offer, the reply box has been completely overhauled from 3.3.x and many glitches that plagued it are now gone. It's not possible to go back to it now and even if we could, I still wouldn't for that reason.

Even hitting the BBCode switch and manually editing the quotes tends to leave large spaces in nested quotes, it's a mess.

It also removes the end quote tags and leaves text indented which is a pain.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's clear to see that you hitting quote on mine and just adding a few lines adds more spaces. This effect becomes more pronounced as the quotes are quoted multiple times.

I read somewhere that Invision didn't code the RTE editor themselves, they took someone else's code and just edited it. That probably explains why it's not as good as the old stuff.

Honestly, I think Invision was better when Matt Mecham coded the whole thing himself. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's clear to see that you hitting quote on mine and just adding a few lines adds more spaces. This effect becomes more pronounced as the quotes are quoted multiple times.

I read somewhere that Invision didn't code the RTE editor themselves, they took someone else's code and just edited it. That probably explains why it's not as good as the old stuff.

Honestly, I think Invision was better when Matt Mecham coded the whole thing himself. :(

It was taking them waaay too much dev time to develop it all in-house, so they had to make that choice... other areas of the suite were beginning to suffer from lack of attention.

The problem with outsourcing the editor code actually lies in BBCode. BBCode isn't a standardised "language", there are slight differences in it from board-to-board so there's simply no editor in existence that handles it perfectly. They've apparently spent almost as much time customising the current 3rd party RTE editor to get it right and accomodate BBCode as they did when they developed it themselves.

IPB 4.0 is supposed to get rid of BBCode entirely and vastly improve the editor... we'll see I guess. The changes to the way quotes are handled are a stepping stone towards that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair point hv, and that's a problem that all companies will face when they grow. Invision's reputation was built on the quality of Matt Mecham's original code but obviously it wouldn't be feasible for him to develop everything himself. It's an unfortunate shame, that's all.

I do hope they get this thing nailed, I can see why they've done what they have, but it's important not to get complacent and assume the current solution isn't without its problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that was pissing me off the most was trying to highlight certain sections of a post because the poster title isn't regular text as it used to be. Makes chopping out certain section of a quote a real pain but I've realised that if you just click on the poster name now you can just press delete to get rid of it and then highlight and delete the text in their post as before. Still a rather arse about face way of having to do things but not as annoying as it was initially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Seriously, the whitespace problem is a big issue in my opinion. I can't be the only person having problems with this.

I am too. Beyond migrating to another platform, I don't think there's anything we can do. Invision seem pretty reluctant to do anything more to the editor until 4.0... at least I got that impression last time I read their boards.

Whenever it's released, we'll be testing 4 before making any decisions as to whether IPB will stay as our forum package in the future. I agree that the current editor is probably the worst for several versions now but we're still a long way from entertaining moving off onto something else for the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love IPB, I think it's definitely the best forum software out there, especially for a forum of this size. The quoting is the only thing that I have a problem with, everything else is completely fine for me. (The odd bit of server downtime mentioned in the other thread, but that's an issue with the host, not the software)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...