ManetsBR Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 The Facebook post (even though it most likely means nothing) and Manet's new sig just makes me wish Axl and Slash would get back together. It doesn't even have to be a full-fledged reunion, just them on speaking terms and Slash performing with New GN'R sporadically like Duff is doing now would be good enough. Same here. It was the reason I changed my sig, although I had already used this one a long time ago.And Jhonny, yes, it wasn't even GNR.1984 -> Their first band together.1994 -> They start to go separate ways.2004 -> Slash starts his first band being out of GNR.2014 -> You know it.Yeah, nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosaj Thing Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I think that's great. I will always want Axl and Slash to be in good terms. Fuck reunion, fuck collaborations. Those bastards gave us the music we love, for the sake of that, shake hands! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trqster Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 (edited) Axl is a control freak - I'm pretty sure he checks out what's going on with Gn'R FB page sometimes.... The strangest thing is that that picture as far as I remember was in Marc Canter's book and there were several other with Axl only and/or with Slash in a less stand-out position... Since Axl doesn't speak to and is pissed off at Marc Canter (since he released Reckless Road book) and hates Slash's guts referring to him as a 'cancer', it's really really odd that someone at Gn'R FB page decided to post such a photo. Edited May 14, 2013 by trqster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMonster Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I honestly don't think Axl cares whether Del or Fernando or whoever it was posted a picture of him and Slash together. Axl isn't denying that Slash was part of GN'R or that that history took place. He might not like talking about Slash today and might be downplaying Slash's importance, but I think that is something else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trqster Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 (edited) I honestly don't think Axl cares whether Del or Fernando or whoever it was posted a picture of him and Slash together. Axl isn't denying that Slash was part of GN'R or that that history took place. He might not like talking about Slash today and might be downplaying Slash's importance, but I think that is something else.Sure it's perfectly normal, given the known circumstances and this point in time to bring up out of the blue an old photo promoting Slash's image and reminding his association with Axl (curious that no other band member was in that photo). After all it's only 22 million facebookers that are following the page - no big deal... Edited May 14, 2013 by trqster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMonster Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I honestly don't think Axl cares whether Del or Fernando or whoever it was posted a picture of him and Slash together. Axl isn't denying that Slash was part of GN'R or that that history took place. He might not like talking about Slash today and might be downplaying Slash's importance, but I think that is something else. Sure it's perfectly normal, given the known circumstances and this point in time to bring up out of the blue an old photo promoting Slash's image and reminding his association with Axl (curious that no other band member was in that photo). After all it's only 22 million facebookers that are following the page - no big deal... It's as normal as posting any other picture from GN'R history with any other configuration of band members. And this wasn't a post originally made on Facebook by Fernando or Del or whoever, this was a Facebook entry that shared a post from Paradise City originally created by someone called Martina. As I am sure you are aware of, GN'R Facebook account shares lots of posts from Paradise City, and apparently this picture was worth sharing without it having some deeper meaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facekicker Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I think it just means the people around Axl are more than happy to use Slash's image behind Axl's back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfierose Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I assume whoever runs the social media stuff is allowed to post stuff from all eras of GNR. I doubt they intensely scrutinise each pic they post, it will just be a job to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trqster Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I think it just means the people around Axl are more than happy to use Slash's image behind Axl's back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sailaway Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I assume whoever runs the social media stuff is allowed to post stuff from all eras of GNR. I doubt they intensely scrutinise each pic they post, it will just be a job to them.Somebody notify Nik Actually it isn't a point of contention, Slash is definitely a part of GNR history so I fail to see the monumental issue of posting a picture like this It isn't like it is some state secret to anyone involved at any point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NGOG Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I actually prefer that GNR are opting for a more moderate approach to their own history. At one point old GNR were essentially a taboo subject, it's better for the band's image that they are seen to recognize the old era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sailaway Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I actually prefer that GNR are opting for a more moderate approach to their own history. At one point old GNR were essentially a taboo subject, it's better for the band's image that they are seen to recognize the old era.Undoubtedly theraputic in untold ways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowOfTheWave Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Slash doesn't deserve Axl's forgiveness. He is manipulative and insensitive to others. Also, can you imagine how annoying Perla would be if they reconciled, pretending to like Axl after she made fun of his weight. Both of them are awful people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sailaway Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Slash doesn't deserve Axl's forgiveness. He is manipulative and insensitive to others. Also, can you imagine how annoying Perla would be if they reconciled, pretending to like Axl after she made fun of his weight. Both of them are awful people.Now that you mentioned it..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magisme Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Slash doesn't deserve Axl's forgiveness. He is manipulative and insensitive to others. Also, can you imagine how annoying Perla would be if they reconciled, pretending to like Axl after she made fun of his weight. Both of them are awful people. Shit is too funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustycage Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Slash is manipulative and insensitive to others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TombRaider Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 (edited) (cupcake mode ON) I don't care if Slash kills kittens in the morning and rapes puppies at night. He is still better than DJ ASHBA (cupcake mode OFF) Edited May 14, 2013 by TombRaider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsh327 Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Axl has good memories of his times with him, and I think as far as he's concerned, the Paradise City site is just something for the fans to post and share. Post Rock Hall, no one's asking when the reunion's happening, so it's all history, isn't it? Chinese Democracy is going to be half a decade old, it's not new anymore. The "No Slash T-shirt" policy is because of hecklers, but I think if they're still doing that, it's kind of silly, because people can wear what they want at festival gigs. Should be interesting to see what happens in NYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMonster Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I remember guys being confused when Axl told a funny anecdote about Slash to some fans recently (a youtube video). Their heads almost exploded from trying to reconcile the fact that Axl could possibly have fond memories of Slash while at the same time believing that he hates everything associated with the guy (misinterpreting the fact that Axl does his utmost to make sure that interviews today is about the current lineup and not about reminiscing and speculating about reunions). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recklessroad Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 The New Hollywood Rose June 28th 1984 at Madame Wong's East. This was their second gig. I think they posted it because Axl looks intense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I actually prefer that GNR are opting for a more moderate approach to their own history. At one point old GNR were essentially a taboo subject, it's better for the band's image that they are seen to recognize the old era. In other words, not doing a Black Sabbth (cropping Bill Ward from their official website). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosaj Thing Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 ^ Yeah, that's great. But we all thought Axl didn't want anything from or about Slash connected with Guns N' Roses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMonster Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 ^ Yeah, that's great. But we all thought Axl didn't want anything from or about Slash connected with Guns N' Roses.Don't talk for me. He's been playing songs with Slash solos extensively these last year, he has used iconography related to the Slash era extensively these last years, he has talked about Slash in interviews and with fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosaj Thing Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 ^ Yeah, that's great. But we all thought Axl didn't want anything from or about Slash connected with Guns N' Roses.Don't talk for me. He's been playing songs with Slash solos extensively these last year, he has used iconography related to the Slash era extensively these last years, he has talked about Slash in interviews and with fans.I didn't mention you. Why would you think I'm talkin' for you? Wtf? He couldn't not stop performing songs that have Slash's solos - that would be asinine, but I think it was pretty obvious (and understandable) that Axl didn't want Slash to be connected with Gn'R. Associating him with "Gn'R" in this present era would only benefit Slash and his current projects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMonster Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 ^ Yeah, that's great. But we all thought Axl didn't want anything from or about Slash connected with Guns N' Roses.Don't talk for me. He's been playing songs with Slash solos extensively these last year, he has used iconography related to the Slash era extensively these last years, he has talked about Slash in interviews and with fans.I didn't mention you. Why would you think I'm talkin' for you? Wtf? The "we all" sort of gave it away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts