Jump to content

Would a "next" GN'R album after TSI by the TSI-era band have failed?


Vincent Vega

Recommended Posts

The UYIs sold 7 million each in the US alone and about 18 million worldwide. Two years later TSI came out and just barely cracked 1 million in the US--a massive drop, even despite it being a cover album.

Consider that Metallica's live "Binge and Purge" set came out the same year and was a massive seller. Similar releases--basically, both bands released no REAL new material, yet Binge and Purge, despite being expensive and a big box set, was a massive hit, while TSI, being just a humble album, was a commercial failure.

In '99, when GN'R released their own live album, it only sold about 500,000 copies in the US. Again compare that to Metallica's S&M released the same year in terms of sales.

If the TSI era lineup had released a record say in '95 or '96, would it perhaps have sold even less, or only on par with TSI?

Might GN'R have been sidelined and faded into obscurity in the 90s even with a "next" mid 90s record by the TSI lineup?

Edited by Vincent Vega
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If GNR had put out new music with Axl, Slash, Duff, and Izzy in '99-'02, it would have done fine, but Axl and Slash would have had to come to some sort of agreement on the direction of the music. I think Axl should've done a full on industrial project outside of GNR under a pseudonym in the mid 90s instead of trying to keep GNR going.

Metallica tried to keep up with things and it worked against them. It's almost been 20 years since "Load" happened so we're going to see evaluations on mid 90s Metallica soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If GNR had put out new music with Axl, Slash, Duff, and Izzy in '99-'02, it would have done fine, but Axl and Slash would have had to come to some sort of agreement on the direction of the music. I think Axl should've done a full on industrial project outside of GNR under a pseudonym in the mid 90s instead of trying to keep GNR going.

Metallica tried to keep up with things and it worked against them. It's almost been 20 years since "Load" happened so we're going to see evaluations on mid 90s Metallica soon enough.

I think Load was their best record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If GNR had put out new music with Axl, Slash, Duff, and Izzy in '99-'02, it would have done fine, but Axl and Slash would have had to come to some sort of agreement on the direction of the music. I think Axl should've done a full on industrial project outside of GNR under a pseudonym in the mid 90s instead of trying to keep GNR going.

Metallica tried to keep up with things and it worked against them. It's almost been 20 years since "Load" happened so we're going to see evaluations on mid 90s Metallica soon enough.

I think Load was their best record.

And you probably wonder why people think you're a dick.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If GNR had put out new music with Axl, Slash, Duff, and Izzy in '99-'02, it would have done fine, but Axl and Slash would have had to come to some sort of agreement on the direction of the music. I think Axl should've done a full on industrial project outside of GNR under a pseudonym in the mid 90s instead of trying to keep GNR going.

Metallica tried to keep up with things and it worked against them. It's almost been 20 years since "Load" happened so we're going to see evaluations on mid 90s Metallica soon enough.

I think Load was their best record.

And you probably wonder why people think you're a dick.

Load shows that they were capable of much much more than just Thrash Metal musically. Not only that but subjectively I'm a fan of rock more than of metal and on Load they're a damn good rock band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If GNR had put out new music with Axl, Slash, Duff, and Izzy in '99-'02, it would have done fine, but Axl and Slash would have had to come to some sort of agreement on the direction of the music. I think Axl should've done a full on industrial project outside of GNR under a pseudonym in the mid 90s instead of trying to keep GNR going.

Metallica tried to keep up with things and it worked against them. It's almost been 20 years since "Load" happened so we're going to see evaluations on mid 90s Metallica soon enough.

I think Load was their best record.

I love both Load and Re-Load

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TSI? "failed" because it was a cover album of mostly obscure then ten year old+ punk songs. It had little commercial appeal apart from the GN'R band. If GN'R released a new album in '95-99, with Slash, Duff, etc. it would have sold 2-4 million in the States. Guns N' Roses would have been in the same boat as Van Halen, Aerosmith, Bon Jovi, etc. who all had big albums in the grunge/post-grunge era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

liked the spaghetti incident. Not a huge metallica fan. Never have been. Load was not great. Re load, I couldn't tell you. garage, inc. who cares, but if I'm in a bar and I play that bob seger cover, people love it! Shit, death magnetic was Metallica going heavy metal again for the fans... Metallica did what GnR should have done. Metallica > Gnr. (artistically/musically, including CD and Illusions, you could argue against that) I don't give a shit about anything Metallica. But I fucking wish I was a Metallica fan rather than a GnR fan. Metallica loves their fans, or at the very least, knows who made them.



answer to question... no. It wouldn't have failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...