KeyserSoze Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 http://www.billboard.com/articles/events/sundance-2015/6450824/scott-weiland-wildabouts-art-of-anarchy"I was never in the band," Weiland says definitively of Art of Anarchy. "It was something I did when I wasn't doing anything. I was asked to write some lyrics and sing some melodies on this project, but it's not a band I'm in. This is my band," he added, nodding to Scott Weiland and the Wildabouts.
Popular Post stella Posted January 27, 2015 Popular Post Posted January 27, 2015 He's just a master at making friends with his bandmates and collaborators, isn't he now? 6
IncitingChaos Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Poor bumble, left Axl for this! Atleast Axl was consistent
Dr. Who Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Because they went and paraded a side project that he felt was nothing more than a side project as the next big thing? Maybe he made it clear to them he didn't view it as anything important, and Bumble, whose only claim to fame is being in GN'R, capitalized on a brief one-off with Weiland and pushed it as a 'supergroup' both to gain attention to himself (it's not the first time he's done things to get attention) and to force Weiland to commit to it?I'll never understand why people automatically, by default, side against Weiland. Even a broken clock is right at least twice a day. Is it because Slash said bad things about Weiland in the papers and his book too? I have a feeling if Slash and Weiland were still on good terms, everyone saying what a dick Weiland is for distancing himself from this project, would be on his side. 1
Popular Post DR DOOM Posted January 27, 2015 Popular Post Posted January 27, 2015 Those shots of him (Weiland) and the band and the video clips Scott alluded to indicate a different story as far as I'm concerned.Obviously it's gone south since then, but it sure looks like he was pretty involved.Can you really believe anything that comes out of Weiland's junkie mouth anyway? 5
Dr. Who Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Those shots of him (Weiland) and the band and the video clips Scott alluded to indicate a different story as far as I'm concerned.Obviously it's gone south since then, but it sure looks like he was pretty involved.Can you really believe anything that comes out of Weiland's junkie mouth anyway?No, Slash told me not to, so I can't.
gunsguy Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 so they ticked him into the band photo? Please....
DR DOOM Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Miser pls, don't try and make me out to be some blind Axl, Slash or whoever fanboy here.
WhazUp Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Things can never be simple when you are dealing with Scott Weiland
Sixes Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 wait, there was trickery involved???so much for that no trickery mantra....
double talkin jive mfkr Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 this is funny way to go bumble
stella Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 (edited) Bumblefoot's response: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/scott-weiland-does-not-seem-happy-to-be-in-a-new-supergroup-20150122#ixzz3Pab9fqriScott recorded a full album, did videos and did photo shoots with the group and they are not claiming he's going on tour with them...it seems kind of ridiculous to be an asshole now and claim it was just something he dabbled in when he had nothing better to do.Thal went on to take a diplomatic approach to Weiland's contention that he would not be performing with the group on any live dates, noting that the group doesn't know if they'll even tour. "The five of us made an album together. Scott is currently the singer of the band. It's in writing; no confusion," added Thal. "But yes, Scott's solo album and tour are his priority and we're all on the same page about getting another vocalist if Art of Anarchy hits the road. But we don't need to cross that bridge just yet. Taking everything as it comes, one step at a time, letting it evolve organically. Where it goes from here (and with who!) is yet to be seen." Edited January 27, 2015 by stella
DR DOOM Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Weiland will more than likely fall back on this Art of Anarchy stuff when his current band members desert him and neither STP or Velvet Revolver will have him back. 1
stella Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Yep. AoA would be smart to shut the door there, too. 1
Free Bird Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 so they ticked him into the band photo? Please....Did they have to? He is part of the album and that's most probably a pic for the booklet. Why shouldn't he be on it?
sweetness Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 "I was never in the band, I just played lead singer for a bit" 2
Popular Post Gackt Posted January 27, 2015 Popular Post Posted January 27, 2015 Four months down the road, "I'm not opposed to an Art of Anarchy reunion" 12
Len Cnut Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Really? Cuz according to every ex-bandmate you ever had you were the biggest member of them all.
LyndaRose Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 lol, bring out an album with the singer already gone, and maybe on tour with another singer....hmmmm
DR DOOM Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Something like Black Sabbath/Tony Iommi would pull in the 80's...
DR DOOM Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 (edited) I've never understood what people see or hear in this dipshit.edit: and that was years before he had anything to do with Slash or VR etc etc etc Edited January 27, 2015 by DR DOOM
stella Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 (edited) I've never understood what people see or hear in this dipshit.edit: and that was years before he had anything to do with Slash or VR etc etc etcSeconded. I know this is subjective but to me there's absolutely nothing appealing about the guy - not his singing, not his stage presence and certainly not his bad attitude. And seeing as how he seems to be poison to nearly every single band that works with him, I'm surprised that anyone would have invited him to be a part of this project anyway. Especially Bumble - I mean, if he was looking for a band experience with minimal drama and disruption, even as a side project, he wasn't going to find it with Scott. Edited January 27, 2015 by stella 1
Dazey Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 I'm pretty much indifferent when it comes to Scott but I can kind of understand where he's coming from here. I mean let's be honest he's the only real "name" in this band and the AofA press release was clearly using that to market themselves. If it was only a small side project as he claims then he probably didn't want it getting confused with his upcoming record and tour with his real band.
Recommended Posts