ChristmasFnatic Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 On both bands, who have better stage presence- Axl and Slash or Steven Tyler and Joe Perry?
ChristmasFnatic Posted December 23, 2015 Author Posted December 23, 2015 Tyler over Axl, Slash over Perry 2
Nosaj Thing Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 Since we're discussing stage chemistry, it is definitely Axl and Slash, imo.
Rovim Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 (edited) Cock rock chemistry. Nothing like what Axl and Slash had on stage. (still have imo, just unused cause Axl was upset for 20 years)Tyler over Axl, Slash over PerryAnd this is a great pic. Slash looks cool as fuck. Better shades, better clothes and smoking. But it's good he doesn't smoke anymore. Edited December 23, 2015 by Rovim
Lethalis Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 Steven Tyler is still awesome, even at this age. At this point he is a way better performer than Axl.Slash is still great, better than Joe Perry.Aerosmith puts on a great show and I enjoy it more than GnR. Steven Tyler is the main reason for that. The guy is crazy.. Every show he could hurt himself falling of a piano, or swinging over the crowd like a maniac. 2
Babooshka Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 (edited) Slash and Axl had the best chemistry in rock. That's why people name their pets after them, and dress up as them for Halloween etc. They've become such an iconic duo.But as excited as I am about a possible reunion, I can not imagine them on the same stage together after all the hostilities. Let alone being all chummy and close.It might be a bit awkward tbh. Edited December 23, 2015 by Babooshka
Jwalker19 Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 On a Guns N' Roses forum, how in THE FUCK would Axl and Slash lose?
Strange Broue Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) Steven and Joe, because Axl has got chemistry with Izzy not with Slash per se On a Guns N' Roses forum, how in THE FUCK would Axl and Slash lose?Umm, maybe because the premise is false? Edited December 24, 2015 by Strange Broue
Free Bird Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Steven and Joe, because Axl has got chemistry with Izzy not with Slash per seDisagree. Axl and Slash at live shows on their haydays? That was pure chemistry man!
Rovim Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Steven and Joe, because Axl has got chemistry with Izzy not with Slash per seCartoon chemistry, not Izzy's thing. Axl and him are singing on the same mic! awww... I love that, but on stage chemistry? Axl and Slash had plenty. Izzy just stood there doing his thing, like Clapton in a way.
Tom2112 Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 I think Ashba & Axl had great chemistry... they were always laughing (at Djs mistakes) and fawning over each other... In reality (for a moment)... stage chemistry wise, Axl and Slash beat out most other bands (IMO), especially if we're talking about early Guns. Both of those guys at their peak were incredible to watch, running all over the place, propping each other up etc. great stuff. Joe and Steven have their own thing, but it's a bit more restrained in comparison.
Strange Broue Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Steven and Joe, because Axl has got chemistry with Izzy not with Slash per seCartoon chemistry, not Izzy's thing. Axl and him are singing on the same mic! awww... I love that, but on stage chemistry? Axl and Slash had plenty. Izzy just stood there doing his thing, like Clapton in a way.wtf are you babbling about?Axl and Slash was rarely interact with each other at live shows during the AFD days. They were selfish even on those years 1
Strange Broue Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Ashba's head like a fucking snake headI wish someone photoshopped his punchable face on a snake's body
Rovim Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) Steven and Joe, because Axl has got chemistry with Izzy not with Slash per seCartoon chemistry, not Izzy's thing. Axl and him are singing on the same mic! awww... I love that, but on stage chemistry? Axl and Slash had plenty. Izzy just stood there doing his thing, like Clapton in a way.wtf are you babbling about?Axl and Slash was rarely interact with each other at live shows during the AFD days. They were selfish even on those yearsI don't know man, I thought what I said was relevant to the topic. You go back and watch some shows. The on stage live chemistry is there. Even a kinda ok show like the taped MTV Ritz '88 show clearly demonstrates that. Axl feeding off Slash's playing and Slash just jizzing all over the place, inspired by Axl's presence and voice. Edited December 25, 2015 by Rovim
DeadSlash Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Wouldn't Steven and Joe win by default for the amount of time they spend together?
Free Bird Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Wouldn't Steven and Joe win by default for the amount of time they spend together?A good point. But that was not the question.
DeadSlash Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Wouldn't Steven and Joe win by default for the amount of time they spend together?A good point. But that was not the question.I thought the question was who had better chemistry?How can 2 guys with a 6 year run even be compared with guys who have been together what 40 years or something?What would the argument be that 2 guys who have not spoken in 20 some odd years have better chemistry guys that have performed together for several decades? I love guns but that doesn't make much sense. 1
RussTCB Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Steven and Joe, because Axl has got chemistry with Izzy not with Slash per seOn a Guns N' Roses forum, how in THE FUCK would Axl and Slash lose?Umm, maybe because the premise is false?And because it's totally OK to not automatically assume everything associated with GNR is the absolute best thing ever just because you post on a GNR forum. 1
Free Bird Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Wouldn't Steven and Joe win by default for the amount of time they spend together?A good point. But that was not the question. I thought the question was who had better chemistry?How can 2 guys with a 6 year run even be compared with guys who have been together what 40 years or something?What would the argument be that 2 guys who have not spoken in 20 some odd years have better chemistry guys that have performed together for several decades? I love guns but that doesn't make much sense.It's about the chemistry they spread together onstage. You can't say they play together for 40 years so they are more charismatic. Axl and Slash together onstage back in the day for me 24/7
Gordon Comstock Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 On a Guns N' Roses forum, how in THE FUCK would Axl and Slash lose?The real question is, why the fuck are there 7 gifs in your signature?
Recommended Posts