gunners_4_eva Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 pearl jam have the sales, but nirvana always seemed to have songs with such deep emotion. i recon both bands are good, what do you think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MancaMulas Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 pearl jam have the sales, but nirvana always seemed to have songs with such deep emotion. i recon both bands are good, what do you think I think in this one i would choose Nirvana, i like them better than Pearl Jam, but i also like Pearl Jam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissirge Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 i would vote for Pearl Jam,because i like Pearl Jam singer more than Kobain and they are harder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 Nirvana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the tourist Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 pearl jam they are better i hope they release a new album soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild_Child Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 Pearl Jam, i find Kurt Cobain really annoying but Nirvanas songs are quite good. I just prefer Pearl Jam all round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mötley_Crüe Posted November 11, 2004 Share Posted November 11, 2004 Are you even kidding me?! Nirvana! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawrence Posted November 11, 2004 Share Posted November 11, 2004 Are you even kidding me?! Nirvana! no they aren't kidding you,PEARL JAM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mötley_Crüe Posted November 12, 2004 Share Posted November 12, 2004 Are you even kidding me?! Nirvana!no they aren't kidding you,PEARL JAM Nirvana! I shall protest this till the end! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaughter Posted November 12, 2004 Share Posted November 12, 2004 Pearl Jam, at least Eddie Vedder didn't blow his head off because he's a fuckin' wimp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mötley_Crüe Posted November 12, 2004 Share Posted November 12, 2004 Pearl Jam, at least Eddie Vedder didn't blow his head off because he's a fuckin' wimp MURDER I SAY, MURDER!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merslain Posted November 12, 2004 Share Posted November 12, 2004 Pearl Jam....Nirvana is good, but pearl jam takes the cake...they have better vocals, better lyrics, and better muscians....with maybe the exception of drummers Grohl is amaing...but Gosard and McCreedy are just amazing...and Eddy can really sing and put his heart into a peice...Also they have stood the test of time, its impossible to say where Nirvana would be these days, so i won't even speculate..but i kNow Pearl Jam still can pack stadiums..listen to any of their live shows form 2000 or 2003, check out the NY DVD they released, amazing.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.T Posted November 12, 2004 Share Posted November 12, 2004 Nirvana..better in studio and live!.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunners_4_eva Posted November 12, 2004 Author Share Posted November 12, 2004 (edited) Pearl Jam....Nirvana is good, but pearl jam takes the cake...they have better vocals, better lyrics, and better muscians....with maybe the exception of drummers Grohl is amaing...but Gosard and McCreedy are just amazing...and Eddy can really sing and put his heart into a peice...Also they have stood the test of time, its impossible to say where Nirvana would be these days, so i won't even speculate..but i kNow Pearl Jam still can pack stadiums..listen to any of their live shows form 2000 or 2003, check out the NY DVD they released, amazing....yeah, i have to agree with you, they can really play.Pearl Jam are just an all round great band, they have great songs, all band members do a great job, and their concerts really go offPJ are definately more of a stadium band than Nirvana were Edited November 12, 2004 by gunners_4_eva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doghan Posted November 13, 2004 Share Posted November 13, 2004 Nirvana..better in studio and live!.. They were a steaming pile of turd live. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bono Posted November 13, 2004 Share Posted November 13, 2004 pearl jam have the sales, but nirvana always seemed to have songs with such deep emotion. i recon both bands are good, what do you think Pearl Jam is by far the better band. better lyrics, better music, in my opinion they are the far more emotional band. the songs mean more. Pearl jam is the shit. nirvan are good but overrated. they rode the success of Smells like teen Spirit and benifited(sad but true) from kurt's ill timed death. I mean Nirvana are more popular after he died than when he was alive. Eddie Vedder is everything Kurt always seemed to claim hen wanted to be. Pearl Jam Hands down is better. Not even close in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GNRIllusion91 Posted November 13, 2004 Share Posted November 13, 2004 They both have a totally different sound...Personally I like Nirvana much better, but Pearl Jam's musicianship is excellent! Pearl Jam live is excellent, early live shows were filled with alot of energy, now they are alittle older, but still put on amazing shows. Nirvana has more of what an "alternative" sound should sound like, Pearl Jam has more of a strait rock sound. About Nirvana live, it depends, they were not always tight. In 1991 (when the band was getting popular) they were the shows with the most energy. 1992 had still some good shows, but Cobain's drug abuse took its toll on his live performance. 1993's shows started horribly, Cobain was so messed up, he started forgetting alot of words, and chords, and his voice lost alot of its high-end. Then when the In Utero tour started they recruited Pat Smear who retought Cobain some of his songs, taught him to sing better, and of coarse play rhythm guitar. By '94, they were very tight, but Cobain was on his last leg, months later he died... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucket13 Posted November 13, 2004 Share Posted November 13, 2004 wow this woulda been such a good pole......its like a freakin war here...i go for bothsince they both had there downsides and upsides :krider: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UsedToLoveHer Posted November 13, 2004 Share Posted November 13, 2004 Pearl Jam, definately. I can still listen to their stuff, but I could never stomach Nirvana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-DST Posted November 13, 2004 Share Posted November 13, 2004 This is like tring to figure out whos shit is better cats or dogs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appetite for illusions Posted November 14, 2004 Share Posted November 14, 2004 Pearl Jam. Without a doubt. So many great songs on ten. Really like "Once". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumin Posted November 14, 2004 Share Posted November 14, 2004 Nirvana is better. I'm not a big fan of either band, but I can get into Nirvana's music a lot more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woman Posted November 15, 2004 Share Posted November 15, 2004 Pearl Jam.Nirvana's good, but I like PJ more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.