criticalsolution04 Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 after listening to it with that part cut out, the song goes from s 10 to about a 3. The middle in the demo really does make it better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
december pain Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 (edited) Edit: Sorry i dont have it Edited February 25, 2006 by december pain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetaSouL Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 (edited) Ok peeps. I'm not opposed to considering the possibilities, but before we dive head first into a dry swimming pool, let's pause for a moment to consider a couple of things.1) I challenge you to NOT use historical, standard or "expected" musical arrangments as a relative backdrop of comparison for determining the legitimacy of this "out of place" segment. Why? Because Axl Rose said so. Do you think he was joking when he said, "I'm trying to do something different. Some of the arrangements are kind of like Queen." What does he mean? Don't be so nieve to interpret "arrangments" as "sound". Queen was famous for its unpredictable transitions, for adding segments of oddity where one would least expect them. Thus, the term "arrangements". Whatever you do, do not marginalize what Axl said in this regard.2) If this altered version that supports the hypothesis, which specifically removes 2:22-3:40, is true, then riddle us this: Why in the world is Axl singing the "All that I wanted was..." chorus-line at 3:22, in the middle of the section believed to be part of another song? Edited February 25, 2006 by MetaSouL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quadlaser Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 Ok peeps. I'm not opposed to considering the possibilities, but before we dive head first into a dry swimming pool, let's pause for a moment to consider a couple of things.1) I challenge you to NOT use historical, standard or "expected" musical arrangments as a relative backdrop of comparison for determining the legitimacy of this "out of place" segment. Why? Because Axl Rose said so. Do you think he was joking when he said, "I'm trying to do something different. Some of the arrangements are kind of like Queen." What does he mean? Don't be so nieve to interpret "arrangments" as "sound". Queen was famous for its unpredictable transitions, for adding segments of oddity where one would least expect them. Thus, the term "arrangements". Whatever you do, do not marginalize what Axl said in this regard.2) If this altered version that supports the hypothesis, which specifically removes 2:22-3:40, is true, then riddle us this: Why in the world is Axl singing the "All that I wanted was..." chorus-line at 3:22, in the middle of the section believed to be part of another song?probably because you heard the wrong altered version, riddle my balls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetaSouL Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 Ok peeps. I'm not opposed to considering the possibilities, but before we dive head first into a dry swimming pool, let's pause for a moment to consider a couple of things.1) I challenge you to NOT use historical, standard or "expected" musical arrangments as a relative backdrop of comparison for determining the legitimacy of this "out of place" segment. Why? Because Axl Rose said so. Do you think he was joking when he said, "I'm trying to do something different. Some of the arrangements are kind of like Queen." What does he mean? Don't be so nieve to interpret "arrangments" as "sound". Queen was famous for its unpredictable transitions, for adding segments of oddity where one would least expect them. Thus, the term "arrangements". Whatever you do, do not marginalize what Axl said in this regard.2) If this altered version that supports the hypothesis, which specifically removes 2:22-3:40, is true, then riddle us this: Why in the world is Axl singing the "All that I wanted was..." chorus-line at 3:22, in the middle of the section believed to be part of another song?probably because you heard the wrong altered version, riddle my ballsThat sounds convincing. 1) I'm not convinced the altered version is real because it has been stated numerous times to have cut out 2:22-3:40, part of which Axl directly sings the chorus line. I guess it's possible Axl has two songs with the same chorus as Better (maybe he had writers block).2) I'm not convinced you have balls to riddle. Pull them out of your mouth and prove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Focker Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 The stupidity on this board is at an all-time high. It's not 2 different songs ya fucking dumb fucks. Listen to the fucking lyrics. And if you can't understand them how the fuck do you consider yourself a G 'N R fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetaSouL Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 The stupidity on this board is at an all-time high. It's not 2 different songs ya fucking dumb fucks. Listen to the fucking lyrics. And if you can't understand them how the fuck do you consider yourself a G 'N R fan.Well said. You're a smart Focker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twoj3j89 Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 Holy F, Put www. in front of the word, then .com, and search guns n roses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 how many minutes was that fan made if was 4:39 its mine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avg_ Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 ive heard better, the proper full version, plus two remixe's ive got a clean version, a heavy version and a studio normal version.i also got twat, remasteredand i.r.s. complete versions, i dont think any of these songs will make the album, they are being leaked because they wont make the album, i think the album will contain songs that will rock 100x more than this, i just know the level of these musicians, and axl rose definately has alot more in him than these songs.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeorose Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 ive heard better, the proper full version, plus two remixe's ive got a clean version, a heavy version and a studio normal version.i also got twat, remasteredand i.r.s. complete versions, i dont think any of these songs will make the album, they are being leaked because they wont make the album, i think the album will contain songs that will rock 100x more than this, i just know the level of these musicians, and axl rose definately has alot more in him than these songs..i cant find the new songs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tucka Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 has anyone got these, and if they have what is the difference, how better is the quality, especially alternative heavier mix of Better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tucka Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 is the heavy version just the normal better without the middle bit and the guitars louder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogg2500 Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 i have these they fuckin rock!!! espically the alternative verison of better, its so heavy sounding it rocks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funeral Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 That sounds convincing. 1) I'm not convinced the altered version is real because it has been stated numerous times to have cut out 2:22-3:40, part of which Axl directly sings the chorus line. I guess it's possible Axl has two songs with the same chorus as Better (maybe he had writers block).Good point.....Axl (or maybe Dizzy i think?) has said that there are different versions of each song in Ch-Democracy......what we hear now, may not be the version we will get on a final cut!it will be interesting to se what's coming! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GilesLavery Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 can someone please PM me as to where i can get this fromthanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crackers Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 (edited) There 3 versions of Better now. You may have got mixed up between 2 and didnt realise. Maybe a fan cut the alternate better into normal better to get the first better we have, Maybe there is 2 versions and 1 fan made which we got first Edited February 25, 2006 by Crackers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funeral Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 (edited) I wish this fans stop fucking with the song...cutting parts out, editing it....it wont make it any better believe me....I like the song the way it was originally leaked!The song it's already one of the best GNR Rockers....it cant get any better! ............... Edited February 25, 2006 by Funeral Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roses eats Lions Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 why doesn´t people discuss this new leaks very much? Especially Catcher in The Rye? Why? No one cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dont Try Me Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 I removed my post from the newswire as they are infact cleaned and re-done by a fan. they are NOT official mixes. DATE: February 25th 2006TITLE: New versions of IRS, Better and TWAT leak, including 3 different mixes of BetterTEXT: New versions have now leaked from the three tracks that were already fully leaked. IRS, Better and There Was A Time. The new collection includes the same versions of IRS and TWAT that had allready surfaced, but they are converted to MP3 using variable bitrates. In other words the quality is much better. The most exciting part is that this collection features three different mixes of Better. The first version is the same that was leaked before. The second version is called the "clean version" It's 3:39 long and does not have the screaming middle part. The guitar is also different. The third version is a very heavy industrial mix and is called "alternate version". All versions are once again ripped using a variable bitrate.The new leaks were packed in a .rar file and included this .nfo file: .: C D - I N F O :.ARTIST : Guns N RosesALBUM : Chinese Democracy (the Imsorry Versions)LABEL : SanctuaryRELEASE DATE : Feb-24-2006RELEASE TYPE : DemoGENRE : Hard RockYEAR : 2006SOURCE : Internet LeakENCODER : Lame 3.90.3 ModQUALITY : VBRkbps / 44.1Khz / Joint-Stereo .: T R A C K - L I S T I N G :.01.I.R.S. [04:05]02.Better [04:56]03.There Was A Time [06:32]04.Better (Clean Version) [03:39]05.Better (Alternate Version) [03:01] ------- 22:13 min 35,5 MB .: R E L E A S E - N O T E S :.Axl Is back! finally!About the tracks i did lots of improvements since drum midiprogramming to supply the laking of overheads also i did someEQ/Comp/limiter to punchy it a little bit.And i did toversions of Better hope u guys enjoy it.:¬)And dont forget when Chinese Democracy hit the stores run toget your copy!One More Thing i'd like to ask to ppl that get it dont put iton p2p; share with your friends only, thanks.Enjoy it!aah, just fan made.....hmmm nothing really interesting then...as for catcher in the rye.....what is there to tell about 9 seconds.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crackers Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 But i do think the cleaned up versions sound very very good. It just wasnt cool of this guy to try and make extra tracks altho he did anounce it, but still, it causes loads of confusion.CITR sounds real. The clip doesn't really give anything away, just a few words and a slight rythm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karlossacanell Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 pm twat pls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redy Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 I love the "Better". I cant stop to listening it. And I cant imagine this song without the middle part. It perfectly fit in there. It wouldnt be "Better" without it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack99 Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 Please post your thoughts and comments about "Better" in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogg2500 Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 it's a cute song... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts