TheSon0fSam Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Aparently, the book worms over at the Star Tribune think that was not the real Axl on stage on Saturday night. check: http://www.startribune.com/457/story/851386.htmlI guess he sounded too good and was too skiny and active for a 44 year old man. I smell bull shit, everyone send an email off to the prick who had the balls to write this story: Chris Riemenschneider • 612-673-4658 • chrisr@startribune.com - He was probably just pissed off Axl gets more ass than he does! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keysita Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Dude, did you actually read this?? There is a little thing called TONE when you write. He just expected "axl behavior" and got a professional lead singer instead. It was actually a good review dummy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy79 Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 (edited) This dude is killing me!Great first post man! I hope to see more of those!!!!Welcome to MYGNRFORUM.COM Edited December 4, 2006 by Roy79 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shootingstar Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Great review!In some wierd way he looks like Brad Pitt in that pic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.