Chris Axl Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 never listened to the pumpkins.same herebut I vote for them, cus they was on The Simpsons Quote
LCG Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 never listened to the pumpkins.same herebut I vote for them, cus they was on The Simpsons So you think the Pumpkins are better than Nirvana just because they've appeared on The Simpsons and Nirvana didn't? Quote
Chris Axl Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 never listened to the pumpkins.same herebut I vote for them, cus they was on The Simpsons So you think the Pumpkins are better than Nirvana just because they've appeared on The Simpsons and Nirvana didn't? ........did you REALLY take my post seriously? Quote
LCG Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 never listened to the pumpkins.same herebut I vote for them, cus they was on The Simpsons So you think the Pumpkins are better than Nirvana just because they've appeared on The Simpsons and Nirvana didn't? ........did you REALLY take my post seriously?It's really hard to tell when you're serious and when you're joking. Quote
Chris Axl Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 never listened to the pumpkins.same herebut I vote for them, cus they was on The Simpsons So you think the Pumpkins are better than Nirvana just because they've appeared on The Simpsons and Nirvana didn't? ........did you REALLY take my post seriously?It's really hard to tell when you're serious and when you're joking.well let put it this way.... I enjoyed more watching that Simpsons episode than lissening to nevermind Quote
Lithium Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Yeah, cause his post are all stupid, whether it's intended or not. Quote
ffrankwhite Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 never listened to the pumpkins.same herebut I vote for them, cus they was on The Simpsons you have no penis. Quote
Guest knerken Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Nirvana anyday. Pumpkins has got some good songs, but Corgan's voice ruins them all, sadly. The band also lack the energy that Nirvana had. Quote
Lithium Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 They are two of my favourite bands at the moment, so it's a pretty tough call, but my vote goes to Nirvana.Nirvana had a whole lot more energy and they made three nearly perfect albums, while The Pumpkins has only released two really great ones, three bad and two mediocre. Quote
Guest Satanisk_Slakt Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Cant believe so many voted pumpkins Nirvana is sooo much better. Quote
LCG Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Cant believe so many voted pumpkins Nirvana is sooo much better.Not surprising though - there is a lot of Nirvana (and Kurt) hatred on this forum. Quote
bax Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 I can't really say. Gish and Siamese Dream were both brilliant records and were very influential to me as a musician. I love the Nirvana stuff as well though. I don't think it's fair to compare the two since Nirvana ended so early and the Pumpkins have put out a lot of sub-par albums. If Kurt had lived and continued to put out quality albums, I'd have to vote for Nirvana Quote
arnold layne Posted July 14, 2007 Author Posted July 14, 2007 What? Nirvana's winning? What kind of forum is this? Unbelievable... Quote
arnold layne Posted July 15, 2007 Author Posted July 15, 2007 NirvanaBilly Corgan pisses me off. Alot.Why is that? Quote
Moop Posted July 15, 2007 Posted July 15, 2007 Nirvana. I've heard quite a few things from Smashing Pumpkins, and although while good, they don't hold a candle next to Nirvana (lyrically anyway). Quote
bluesy Posted July 16, 2007 Posted July 16, 2007 (edited) Love both, but the Pumpkins just had more balls with their material. Gish just kicks ass, Siamese Dream is a masterpiece on par with Nevermind, Mellon Collie is a career peak, Adore is just fucking beautifully depressing, Machina kicks your ass in space, Zeitgeist is reinvigorated ass kicking. Rarely a dull moment in their entire catalogue. Unfortunately for Nirvana, Cobain died before he could take the band in a new direction. He said In Utero was gonna be their last record with the 3-chord song structure and he really wanted to branch out. He had a great love for new wave and other obscure bands; it would have been interesting to see him grow as a songwriter. Edited July 16, 2007 by bluesy Quote
arnold layne Posted July 16, 2007 Author Posted July 16, 2007 Love both, but the Pumpkins just had more balls with their material. Gish just kicks ass, Siamese Dream is a masterpiece on par with Nevermind, Mellon Collie is a career peak, Adore is just fucking beautifully depressing, Machina kicks your ass in space, Zeitgeist is reinvigorated ass kicking. Rarely a dull moment in their entire catalogue. Unfortunately for Nirvana, Cobain died before he could take the band in a new direction. He said In Utero was gonna be their last record with the 3-chord song structure and he really wanted to branch out. He had a great love for new wave and other obscure bands; it would have been interesting to see him grow as a songwriter.I'm glad I've met somebody here that actually enjoys Zeitgeist, I can't figure out why so many individuals loathe that album. It rocks! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.