If something you uploaded gets banned for copyright infringement you need to submit a counter notification which will be successfull under these circumstances:
"The four factors of fair use: 1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
Courts typically focus on whether the use is “transformative.” That is, whether it adds new expression or meaning to the original, or whether it merely copies from the original.
2. The nature of the copyrighted work
Using material from primarily factual works is more likely to be fair than using purely fictional works.
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
Borrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions. However, even a small taking may weigh against fair use in some situations if it constitutes the “heart” of the work.
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
Uses that harm the copyright owner’s ability to profit from his or her original work are less likely to be fair uses. Courts have sometimes made an exception under this factor in cases involving parodies."
These rules are slightly different from country to country. Other than that you can only stop Warchild or whatever alias she is using if somebody actually having the right to claim on behalf of themselves or their client would stand up. but yeah basically everybody can make complaints about anyone regarding copyright infringement and whoever can prove it's theirs wins.
Axl Rose may be driving the car in front of me video
in GUNS N' ROSES - DISCUSSION & NEWS
Posted
If something you uploaded gets banned for copyright infringement you need to submit a counter notification which will be successfull under these circumstances:
"The four factors of fair use: 1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposesCourts typically focus on whether the use is “transformative.” That is, whether it adds new expression or meaning to the original, or whether it merely copies from the original.
2. The nature of the copyrighted workUsing material from primarily factual works is more likely to be fair than using purely fictional works.
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a wholeBorrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions. However, even a small taking may weigh against fair use in some situations if it constitutes the “heart” of the work.
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted workUses that harm the copyright owner’s ability to profit from his or her original work are less likely to be fair uses. Courts have sometimes made an exception under this factor in cases involving parodies."
These rules are slightly different from country to country. Other than that you can only stop Warchild or whatever alias she is using if somebody actually having the right to claim on behalf of themselves or their client would stand up. but yeah basically everybody can make complaints about anyone regarding copyright infringement and whoever can prove it's theirs wins.