Bailey96

All good ideas that won’t probably  be used. If they used the idea of having one show from each year of the tour, I’d want the forum show that they played 3.5- 4 hours long from 91. 92 is kind of question mark for me. Be ironic if the 93 show they picked was the Saskatoon show. I’d personally like to see the Austin show which I believe was the skin n bones opener

I could see gnr doing you ain’t the first. I don’t think they play dust n bones without izzy 

Pulling the deep cuts man. Too bad he’s not playing in my city (Phoenix) 

1 hour ago, sidman69 said:

here's the original interview clip

 

 

I remember when Frans N Roses had his channel and used that footage in one of his welcome to the jungle videos last year. So yeah this clip isn’t new 

18 minutes ago, gunsguy said:

They didn't.

That stage is too big with the wrong light rig.

They had no backup singers in 93 as it was the skin n bones tour without the singers.

For most of 93, they didn’t have backup singers but I think they played Australia and New Zealand that year. They still had them. Audio from the clip already been established it’s from live era

https://www.setlist.fm/setlist/guns-n-roses/1993/the-palace-of-auburn-hills-auburn-hills-mi-33d67c99.html

if this were to come out, be awesome to see a pro shot of reckless life. Really like to see a show with locomotive, breakdown, or the garden of eden come out

15 minutes ago, Gambit83 said:

Niven tells Lafon that he wouldn't be surprised at a genuine reunion in KY

I take that with with a huge grain of salt. Who knows, maybe Monday the gnr twitter page wishes izzy a happy Birthday. I mean slash did it to axl in 2015 and that reunion eventually happened

4 hours ago, BadApples99 said:

Someone in the comments asked when and Mitch replied with "Saturday"

Just leaving this here...

This is a tease. I’ve learned my lesson with this band. It’s just cruel jokes at this point

30 minutes ago, GnR Chris said:

They play for three hours and play nearly all their well-known songs. How is that lazy? It's a rhetorical question, by the way, because you made a dumb statement.

Still what band plays three straight years with pretty much the same setlist. Even if you don’t add new songs, they could cut the setlist and rearrange the songs they play. 

12 minutes ago, sidman69 said:

there won't be no music i think. Same setlist as before. 

If it is the same setlist, is there something worse than lazy? 

It’s appears Woodstock is coming back for a 50th anniversary: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.syracuse.com/entertainment/2018/12/woodstock-50th-anniversary-concert-site-dates-confirmed-for-2019.html%3foutputType=amp

Yes I know GNR didn’t come up as a rumored band in the article but what are the chances the band could be on the bill for next year? 

Kind of odd but a great Christmas surprise and axl doesn’t sound too bad on it. I personally don’t think the guitar is slash or angus btw.

I wouldn’t say this tour validates the album but it definitely made me look at the album with a better look (no pun intended). I don’t really consider it a gnr album but it’s not terrible by any means. I think seeing slash and duff was cool for a minute but It became a bit overkill when every new song that was added into the setlist was either a cd song or a cover and then having over 5 cd songs at one point in the setlist I believe. They’ve played about 9 cd songs out of 14 on this tour and 9 out of 12 of appetite. Kind of surprise considering even casual fans going to these shows don’t really know cd songs. 

I wouldn’t rule out gnr new music. I think a good opportunity to record new music is for the next terminator movie coming out and do one song for it. Would be nice to see izzy record with them since touring is probably not an option (personally, it be good just see him record new music again) . It’s all hopeful thinking but since slash and duff aren’t ruling it out, it’s possible. You never know with this band. 

I think even though izzy was probably distancing himself from the band at the time during this era, when he was there he made it count. Showed off his vocal abilities and more of his writing abilities. Obviously he’s no axl but his voice works on his songs like dust n bones and 14 years. I always wondered why he sang DTJ on the record but axl sang it live

4 minutes ago, zombux said:

actually, they played Madagascar at every single show since RIR3 - that means 3 plays in 2001 and 6 plays in 2002 before VMAs  

yes, it sounded quite OK in 2002, considering Axl was arriving late as always and instead of arriving super late thanks to the taxi stuck in traffic jam, he ran on foot to the venue. that explains why he was even more flushed out than usually.

Yeah I thought they debuted in 2002 but then I remembered rio 2001. It’s not a show along with the vmas that I watch a lot  so kind of easy to forget for myself 

Just now, zombux said:

Madagascar debut happened at RIR 2001 already, and was played a couple more times before the VMAs. I know that the VMAs were probably the first publicly known newgnr appearance, but no way that was the debut of anything.

Shit I forgot rock in rio 2001. At least it sounded alright in 2002 even though the overall performance at the show wasn’t good.

Well at least he showed up for rehearsal. But yeah these were dark times for gnr and that performance is possibly the worst show In bands history from axls voice next to the bridge school benefit. I feel the rehearsal for this isn’t worth blowing a ton of money for either. But hey what do you guys prefer: Madagascar debut but the classics sounded like shit or a whole show sounding like shit but at least we got pitman waving a towel. 😂😂😂

the thing I don’t get about the bands setlist is the amount of covers that are in the setlist that just drag the shows along. I’m perfectly fine if those songs such as black hole sun and witchita linemen and the seeker are not played if it gives axl a little bit more stamina. I’m ok with a setlist that’s skin n bones length to be honest.

It does frustrate me that songs that have been rarely played live that the band could pull off today are not being played such as so fine, bad obsession, and pretty tied up. I’m not sure how much he would of factored into this setlist, but if izzy was in the band some of those songs that we haven’t seen live a lot such as dust n bones, 14 years, and think about you would surely make an appearance. I’m surprised think about you hasn’t made an appearance on this tour considering axl played that song a lot from 2001-2006

I wanna see all the songs that have been in the alternate setlist the last two years in the setlist at one point. Slither was one of em, perfect crime, think about you and you’re crazy would be nice additions.

Definitely a step up from Berlin. I doubt this happens, but with shadow of your love in the setlist and axl doing a decent job on it if other fast tempo songs like perfect crime, right next door to hell, or reckless life could be played?

I Really hope there not alternating patience and don’t cry again. I’m wondering if there doing that with black hole sun and Wichita linemen as well.

11 minutes ago, GNR 1991 said:

At this point in the NITL tour there are just three songs never played lived but are or were on the alt setlist: Oh My God, You’re Crazy (AFD) and Perfect Crime

 

They may as well have a crack at all three before it’s all over.

Don’t forget Think About You

Don’t cry wasn’t played? Right?