evil_l

Axl refusing to show up to a paid gig ontime....refusing to play by the rules of the people PAYING him money to perform........having the show ended earlier - thereby screwing GnR FANS..........ya, he is a real rebel.

I agree.

Mygnrforum: Same forum, Same shitty attitude

Hu... kinda feels like I a bit late here.. It was a great read tho! Very cool! Thx for sharing your thoughts on some topics Axl!

I had no opinion on Fortus until I saw Guns in Sweden this summer. Fortus did have a fantastic both stage precence and his solowork was excellent. Much better than Fincks. Ron Thal is by far the best guitarrist in the band but Fortus does a great job too.

he's an awesome player (not as good as Buckethead, but still)

By far my favourite of the three guitarists. Axl made a wise move picking him. He's a big asset. I just wish he'd sing a bit, his solo records prove he's good at it. He already has the only entertaining solo (actually, y'know, playing GNR material during it). If he sang a bit it'd just be amazing.

Well, the sick part is that he is almost or even as good as Bucket. Actually, as members already stated, Bucket is the perfect new addition, his got precense on stage, he's a heelufa player, he's in connection with the band so, to me, Thal in the band is just an addition.

Well, here is the deal folks: GnR is a brand. That's why people still see them despite the lack of new material or most original members. GnR is also a band (whom which I strongly support), but except for a shrinking fanbase most people attends to Guns shows because of the brand (i.e. Axl Rose and the Appetitie material). However, I believe that if CD is succesful then maybe the band Guns n' Roses can be strong again and people attend to the shows to see Bumble or Stinson and here CD tunes as much as of the wish to see Axl and have a nostalgica evenening.

jmho.

because they will do what he wants and he gets his way. With people his level he can't get his way.

No actually, musicwise, it's the opposite. When you play with musicians that's better than you you'll make every effort you can to get as good as them.

However, they might be yes-sayers and thus not "fuel his fire". Maybe he need that... hmm.. fight with his bandmembers. I don't know. But it got nothing to do with their technichal skills, I assure you.

Yes! They should have a solid base cosisting of several AFD, some UYI and some CD and then a pretty big list of options. So to shows feels more unique. I think it gets more fun for the band aswell.

And ofcourse, when CD is released they need to add at least another, maybe four song from it to the setlist.

First of all, yes. This is a good idea. Queen is most likely the best band ever and will probaby remain that forever. Here's a few song tips:

Bohemian Rhapsody

We are the Champions

Innuendo

It's a miracle

The show must go on

Prince of the Universe

Is this the world we created?

And for a starter you can always get your hands on the first two Queen greatest hits albums. Those are fantastic and a great way to enter the world of Queen.

Am I the only one who thinks something is going down at the L.A. shows? Maybe an announcement from Axl, a single, something?

We'll see.

Why?

examples

Huh? The people of Iraq are not bombing anyone, and America is killing their own youth by tricking people they are there to bring them democracy when everybody knows this was only a profit hunt. Too bad no other countries had the balls to say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH when they went against the wishes of the UN and attacked Iraq. Fuck Bush and when we´re on the subject people should check out the documentary "American Blackout" that is about how they made it hard and in many cases impossible for black people (and white people living in so called black communities) to vote so that Bush would win 4 more years....

Spoken like a true brainwashed 12 year old!

and

First of all, you're obviously a staunch liberal. Secondly, not a very smart one.

This kind of of unnecessary insults...

Come on guys, all are about money, petrol and domination.

Anyone who thinks that America fights for the people's rights or the universal peace is naive. Anyway, I also think that Axl isn't intersted in politics.

But there is also sth I can't understand. How while noone agree with Bush but he was again elected?

One day I was flying from London to Athens and I met one guy of an american rock band on tour, I think they are called DangerDanger. Anyway, he had no idea about what is happening in the world, he thought that America is the saver of other nations and its role is to establish peace everywhere but on the other hand he was make fool of Bush. When I asked him if he voted for him at least he was honest and said yes. And when I asked him why he told me that the other candidates seemed more idiots even than Bush! T

he point is that if people like the guy from the band I met, who should be more open minded by the time they travel to other countries, talk with foreign people etc stands for America's current position then there is no hope for a change...

That was by far the dumbest and most ignorant post I've ever read since that French guy that used to post here.

Next time you see an American or British WW2 veteran, make sure you shake their hand. Give the Russians a high-five too. They made it possible for Greece, and quite probably your existence, to even exist. Next time the Soviet Union rises, give the old USA a call and we'll keep them out of your backyard again, too.

EDIT: Oh, and if you want some political insight on American politics, I suggest you go to SCHOOL and not get it from some 'guy in a rock band from America'. Are you serious? Did you really make yourself sound that stupid?

First of all I've finished school years ago. And from gallops I see form your country most people don't even know where Iraq is.

Second, America NEVER helped Greece, you are completely ignorant of history.

Third, you should feel stupid, not me. You have no clue about what happens outside America. Keep on sleeping pal

The ignorance is so thick you can cut it with a knife in here... apparently your professors are just as dumb and ignorant as you sweetheart.

So what you're saying is: America played no part in defeating Nazi Germany... the facists that occupied your country and humiliated your people.

If that's what you believe, this is where I end this conversation because I don't even bother with people who like to blindly and ignorantly insult other people of other nationalities who obviously have NO CLUE what they're talking about.

Back to the street corner honey... because that's about as smart as you sound.

okay.. so then you want to defend your country and out of nowhere bring up WW2 as example. I think US did a great job i WW2 and I'm grateful for it, but that was 60 years ago. Many bad thing has happened since. And, lets not forget, you insult Gina on several occations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of...by_Nazi_Germany

Who's the dumbass?

I realised my wrong and thus deleted my post. But unfortunatly it was seen before that happened. Well, I have no problem admitting I was wrong when it's obvious I made a mistake.

You didn't feel the urge to respond to me when I admitted I was wrong...

So, you didn't know that the Nazi's occupied Greece. Ms. Ignorant doesn't understand world history. So that makes you both retarded. Does that mean you shouldn't be talking to her... or is it okay for retards to have their own inner circle?

Ah, let me put it this way.. retardism and a somewhat lacking history education ain't really the same thing in my book.

btw, I think we've been out of topic for a while and I predict soon-to-be locking of this thread.

I agree that all this was not the point here but Matt was just tryind to play it clever.

And Matt, of course you have blocked me, after the insulting personal msg you sent that's what every pussy like you would do in order to save himself (or maybe I should say herself) from arguing. And the fact that USA gets into other countries fields with no ethic reason is not insulting, it is just a fact. Insult is the words you use against me. Anyway, it is late to learn you how you should behave, that was your parents' job

Believe me, Evil, I know plenty about world history. Obviously much more than you do. I suggest you hit the back button in this thread and read my 'long' post. If you think you know something and can argue any of the points I made in that thread, I'd be happy to have a decent conversation with you if you can refrain from calling anybody a 'retard' without making any points of validity whatsoever on the topic... other than an incorrect synopsis of a historical event. For someone who claims to be somewhat intelligent, just flat out calling somebody 'retarded' and trying to come off as someone smarter than somebody else... well, that's pretty much retarded:)

...instead you started by insulting insulted me. Then, as the discussion continued, you don't answer to my statement. You just point out again that you have a very good knowledge of history. I say it one more time: "Ah, let me put it this way.. retardism and a somewhat lacking history education ain't really the same thing in my book." Please tell me, how can you answer that with bragging about your history education?

Me agreeing with Gina was based on your other posts in this thread(from some I've qouted in this answer) and a lot of your posts in general. And I do believe that your education has very little to do with whatever you're intelligent or not. As a further notice I can agree with the fact that I may be a little harsh on you, but that's only 'cause you tend to insult the members on this board that you do not agree with on a pretty regular basis. And that dear Matt, really bugs me.

To a mod: Please move this thread to the anything goes section of lock it. It has nothing to with guns n roses news anymore and I'm afraid it will only lead to more personal insults.

Edit: For some bloody reason the qoutes do not work properly making it somewhat of a pain in the ass to read this post. Too bad.

I like people who feel the need to call other people stupid, retarded and so on, especially when they use wikipedia as a source for facts. I bet Bush does the same...

Don´t even understand why you people answer this guy who thinks he is free of a political standpoint and only sees the world in black and white. Whatever you say to him he will brush it of by ridiculing you and then posting some link from some republican fact page to support his actions. The weird thing is that if all of you did the same thing as him you´d only create a vicious circle so let him sit up their on his self made piedestal and throw potatoes. He can defend the war as much as he wants if it makes him feel better about this fucked up situation.

Good post.

And on a side note... I noticed your sig, you listen to Purusam?? Cool. I used to hang out with their lead guitarists from time to time.

I agree with your bottom line tho.

So, you didn't know that the Nazi's occupied Greece. Ms. Ignorant doesn't understand world history. So that makes you both retarded. Does that mean you shouldn't be talking to her... or is it okay for retards to have their own inner circle?

Ah, let me put it this way.. retardism and a somewhat lacking history education ain't really the same thing in my book.

btw, I think we've been out of topic for a while and I predict soon-to-be locking of this thread.

First of all I've finished school years ago. And from gallops I see form your country most people don't even know where Iraq is.

Second, America NEVER helped Greece, you are completely ignorant of history.

Third, you should feel stupid, not me. You have no clue about what happens outside America. Keep on sleeping pal

The ignorance is so thick you can cut it with a knife in here... apparently your professors are just as dumb and ignorant as you sweetheart.

So what you're saying is: America played no part in defeating Nazi Germany... the facists that occupied your country and humiliated your people.

If that's what you believe, this is where I end this conversation because I don't even bother with people who like to blindly and ignorantly insult other people of other nationalities who obviously have NO CLUE what they're talking about.

Back to the street corner honey... because that's about as smart as you sound.

Actualy, it was Italy and not German that occupied Greece. But sure, America played a large role in the deafeting of the Axis. So, smartasses, your both wrong.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of...by_Nazi_Germany

Who's the dumbass?

Am I missing sth?

Where is USA in all these? It is exactly what I said, we got help from Britain. Anyway, this is not the point.

Ok, sorry, I shouldn't argue with retards. It will never happen again

Britain would probably not have persisted if it wasn't for the US, let alone been victorious . Maybe it was british soldiers who freed Greece, I don't know, but it's likely that they wouldn't have a chance to do that if US never joined in.

I agree with your bottom line tho.

First of all I've finished school years ago. And from gallops I see form your country most people don't even know where Iraq is.

Second, America NEVER helped Greece, you are completely ignorant of history.

Third, you should feel stupid, not me. You have no clue about what happens outside America. Keep on sleeping pal

The ignorance is so thick you can cut it with a knife in here... apparently your professors are just as dumb and ignorant as you sweetheart.

So what you're saying is: America played no part in defeating Nazi Germany... the facists that occupied your country and humiliated your people.

If that's what you believe, this is where I end this conversation because I don't even bother with people who like to blindly and ignorantly insult other people of other nationalities who obviously have NO CLUE what they're talking about.

Back to the street corner honey... because that's about as smart as you sound.

Actualy, it was Italy and not German that occupied Greece. But sure, America played a large role in the deafeting of the Axis. So, smartasses, your both wrong.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of...by_Nazi_Germany

Who's the dumbass?

I realised my wrong and thus deleted my post. But unfortunatly it was seen before that happened. Well, I have no problem admitting I was wrong when it's obvious I made a mistake.

old. but a little bit funny still.

so thay just want to let iraq and all those ones bomb the fucking place and get away with it. axls punched people in self defence hasnt he? but you dont see him and bach saying nononono peace peace.

"iraq" wants to bum "the fucking place"; you mean a Gn´R Show!?

you seam a little mentally "disturbed"........at least.

"Civil War" was by the way just a song that wanted to point out that there ain´t that much "civil" in wars "anyway"(s). Still not a political song. Turn on the news and you see what it´s all about, you might even wanna travel to baghdad!?

no you got it sll rong, fuck you, I think your the distured one. when the fuck did i say " bombs at a gnr show" by place i ment " America/Britian" if you had brains you would no.

Omg.. It hurt my eyes and my brain melts when I try to figure out WTF sucker punch is trying to say when he posts somethinhg.

Gotta love May.

so thay just want to let iraq and all those ones bomb the fucking place and get away with it. axls punched people in self defence hasnt he? but you dont see him and bach saying nononono peace peace.

iraq, pikistan all those types of places ex- 9/11 etc why should thay get away with it if you want peace you have to kill all the people that are making the promlems tem we will have it

Eu? Allright, conidering the fact that you write like a retarded I might have misunderstood you. But I read it as you mean something like this:

"Iraq, pakistan and all other muslim states must be eliminated because they are enemies to peace and are all responsible for the 9/11 terror."

If that was what you meant then you must be - by far - the dumbest person on this forum. Some examples, Pakistan actaully helped US when they attacked Afganisthan. Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction or any connection to the 9/11 terror.

Bombing civilans do not stop either terror nor hate, famine, unstability or (civil)war. Actually, it's the very opposite, bombing civilans tends to lead to increased terror, hate, famine, unstability and (civil)war. One can only hope that the purpose with "The war on terror" isn't to kill civians. But to this date, it is the civians who has taken the big hit and terror, hate, famine, unstability and (civil)war has increased in the two regions where the war on terror has been executed with full strengh (Afganisthan and Iraq).

Wow. Just wow. Those pictures are bloody great!

Here we go again... im tired of this threads.... i predict 229 pages....

Fabulous first post man.

I thought that too!

he has a point. whho here hangs with the people you used to in school

I do. Does that makes me a wierdo?

For some wierd reason it feels like dwaindibbley and rich256 is the same person posting from two different accounts, constantly qouting the other account and agreeing to that the post trying to make his or her point more valid.

But on the other hand. I could be wrong.

I found that to be a very good read, really like what I was feeling when I saw them in Stockholm this summer.