Jump to content

Slaxls

Members
  • Posts

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Slaxls

  1. Weak.

    :no:

    Yeah, weak.

    The song is very average.

    Also, has anybody noticed that slash's soloing on studio tracks these days seems a bit...out of time, I mean he seems to hit the notes just ever so slightly behind or before the beat, and not in a good way, like its out of time and jarring kind of way, like hes struggling to hit the note, but he does it all the time so its being done on purpose. Its annoying - he used to hit the money notes all the time, bang on the point where you wanted them when he was in gnr and snakepit, now we get this sloppy crap from him (i know he said something about it being sloppy on purpose) but it sounds wrong. Listen to that solo and you'll see what i mean.

    He is also not doing anything impressive musically or technically here.

    We know he can still play good solos, we have heard them in concert (look at how he improvises over rocket queen for example)

    Where is that LIVE AWESOMENESS gone?? He has the talent, we have been seeing it

    WHERE DOES IT GO IN THE STUDIO???

    That solo was bland and didnt go anywhere - it never got to that 'fuck yeah' moment that he used to do so well. It kind of drips in, stays for a boring ride them fucks off without asking.

    Meh.

    frankly I was hoping he might do something a little more along the lines of this, which is similar in style, but is more urgent, aggressive and gets your blood pumping a lot more (i.e - balls - I suppose its difficult when myles has no balls!) :

    Also, is that Myles doing back up vocals as well??

    Why isnt fucking Todd doing them???????? for fucks sake!

    And why is Myles doing the fucking rhythm guitar work too???? isnt that insulting to the rhythm guy in the band???

    Too much myles input i think. Not enough 'band'.

    Im sure it might grow on me, but its not amazing by any standards.

    The last part seems to have something going for it, where he repeats 'i dont need you to save me any more' - if THAT part was developed then perhaps it would be better. I can imagine in the past he would have jammed this out further and that repeated guitar lick would have turned into a blistering solo over the vocals (like what he used to do in gnr) and myles could get screamier and angrier until fade out...

    I suppose you need a singer like Axl to inspire that kind of thing though...urgh...

    Dammit - I wish I produced this record, I could tell him how to make his material great :P

  2. Something with Axl. I love Slash , but Myles' voice just does nothing for me at all. Axl has stated he had to push Slash to do Estranged,November Rain,Patience, and all the piano based songs. I believe Axl can tap into Slash's potential more than any other artist. With that being said, I know itis not going to happen. Just answering the question,which I think is a cool thread. Hopefully there are some interesting answers, becuase mine is obvious and far fetched.

    I don't think Slash needs Axl necessarily, but collaborating again with Izzy might do the trick. I liked Slash's last record a lot, but I agree sometimes his stuff borders on kinda generic sounding R&R. I felt the same with Velvet Revolver when they were around and only recently started delving a little into their library beyond the singles ("Messages" is amazing).

    Anyway, with Mr. Stradlin, I think you get their dueling guitars going. Listen to how cool "Ghost" sounds. Now that I think about it, I wonder why they never did a low-budget digital-only release like Izzy routinely does. I think it would be really cool to see Duff, Izzy and Slash all collaborate on something together, the three of them. Don't know who would do vocals.

    i WOULD LIKE TO HEAR HOW VELVET REVOLVER SOUNDED WHEN THEY JAMMED WITH JOSH TODD AND KEITH NELSON - BEFORE THEY GOT TOO BIG FOR THEIR BOOTS AND STARTED TO THINK ABOUT COMMERCIAL APPEAL.

    WHILE THEY WERE JUST JAMMING BECAUSE THE CHEMISTRY WAS GOOD.

  3. tHIS DOESNT MAKE MUCH SENSE

    But this does:

    VAN HALEN - hated each other - got back together

    SIMON AND GARFUNKEL - hated each other - got back together

    THE EAGLES - hated each other - got back together

    Black Sabbath - Not sure if hate was the word, but it took a long time, and nobody thought it would ever happen...

    Harry enfield and Paul whitehouse ... :)

    can anybody think of any more famous band break ups and reunions???

    I think the van halen thing gives us all hope. How long did it take them??? How long can we expect to wait???

  4. Ok, heres a MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR problem with reuniting the original GNR:

    AXL OWNS THE NAME

    which means that if they reunited Axl would have to HIRE them and they would be able to be fired by axl at any time. Essentially not full members and I don't think any of them would want to be at Axls mercy. It would be beneath them and not right. I think slash has said about this before, about them all needing to be equal members

    Now, Axl is unlikely to ever give up the rights he has, since he is such a control freak, and also, since he is in the position of owning them, he would be unlikely to want to give it up for any other reason.

    So there is a problem there.

    This is slightly beside my main point, but i think it is a MAJOR reason, much bigger than any personal issues they all have.

    Slash doesnt want to be Axls bitch, which is what he will be if he rejoins as a hired hand. The guys in axls current band dont mind being bitches because they are nobodys and are unlikely to do big tours on their own. (they also like the money)

    NOW

    Would on to my main question.

    Would any of you that like the current band be enthusiastic about the original band reuniting and keeping the current touring band going as well (essentially axl would have two bands) and the current 'gnr' would then be called 'the axl rose band' and they can carry on, but we can also have the real gnr as well?

    Would that float your boat?

    Another scenario (possibly more or perhaps less likely depending on which member of old gnr's view you take)

    :

    The original band gets back together and the current band stays together, axl has two bands BUT

    the current gnr stays with the name GUNS N ROSES

    and the reunited guns n roses are called something else (I offer 'VELVET RE-LOADED' lol)

    This scenario would allow them all to be equal partners again and axl would keep the gnr name.

    WHAT DO YOU THINK IS MORE LIKELY AND WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON ALL THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????

  5. My god. I liked the ballad of death, but this is just boring. Its the same couple of ideas repeated and repeated and repeated, like its on a freaking loop - like a keybord demo. It bored the crap out of me, I was waiting for it to develop a bit but it didnt! He didnt take it anywhere just kept repeating. No drive to it, no kick, no solo, just boring melodic ideas which aint even that great to start with.

  6. I just relistened to that checkmate clip again. How GREAT is it? Let's send Axl our love and support for the song and maybe he'll go "Damn Randy was right!"

    Come on mygnrforum

    Profress your love the song that is CHECKMATE

    I'll admit that it sounds better than anything on Chi-dem, but its still a pretty generic sounding riff, and the lyrics seem to be about relationship heartache...seriously??? in a rock number??

    Where is axls balls? Where are the fun lyrics which are full of attitude from the past?? 'pretty tied up', 'wecome to the jungle'

    axl has lost his balls.

  7. Perla seriously has below average looks if you compare to the normal "rockstar standards". And I really dig that about Slash - he married a real woman instead of some doll. I do not care much for playboy model looks though, and think Perla is way prettier than Susan for example. But MILF? She's not even 40!

    'Love to see some pics of you hottie. I play the guitar, trumpet, and bass drum; I'm always looking for new groupies.

    sign up here: I'm hotter than Perla

    you look like a massive nerd. WHich is what you are.

  8. but I think the OP is saying that Slash has a hot wife and kids and has a successful life

    OP is wrong then because Perla isn't hot.

    She's a MILF.

    exactly. Anyone who says they wouldn't bang the shiit out of Perla is gay.

    Where is Axl in terms of family? All the other members of GNR are married. AXL is foreveralone.

  9. I think you guys are missing the real point here - you are a little too wrapped up in this fanboy shnit, but I think the OP is saying that Slash has a hot wife and kids and has a successful life - whereas Axl is foreveralone and lives with a spanish family (are they spanish (that berta thing??) anyway, she is like his mom who takes care of him and he hangs ouot with her kids - kind of weird.

    Axl fails big time at life - he is rich - but he is a weirdo.

  10. you took a lot of words to say that axl once fronted a band called guns n' roses and now fronts a band called guns n' roses. so essentially, you proved my point. thank you.

    if you want to buy a copy of chinese democracy, where do you look? the guns n' roses section. the same section where all their albums can be found, regardless of which musicians performed on it..

    You are a retard.

    He proved the point that it is a different band. Anyone can see its a different band - they are different people. He showed how it's even legally considered a different band, and how that can be so even with the same name. Axl's fucking contract which HE HAD DRAWN UP states that the original band came to an end and a new band was started.

    You can't argue with that - you are making yourself look foolish.

  11. Just found an article basically saying VR aint gonna do anything until Slash has done his album with miles.

    Not supprising really, he's got a great singer there and a really great band who he is having fun with and playing really well and most importantly he is free to play HOW HE WANTS.

    In VR, if they got the wrong singer then lots of possibly great material would be wasted on a below par singer - they don't need that shit again!

    If the miles and slash album is good and sells well, I'll bet Slash won't be too worried about Velvet revilver at all.

    I mean its been like almost ten years now since the randy castillo concert where they all jammed together with the buckcherry guys - back then they reignited the old energy and they felt energised and excited to form a band...

    ...it didnt really work out the way they hoped for whatever reason.

    I think that the ship has sailed basically. They are keeping VR going because they are all still friends and there was no 'break up' between them (except for losing their singer) so they are more like a bunch of pals that just get together these days - but i bet the business side and the expectations of the music - album - tour and finding a singer are just a headache to those guys...

    slash has his great band - mckagen has loaded. They are happy playing with guys they know are good and they have fun with.

    VR is a hasstle and an unknown quantity....

    anyway, heres the articles:

    http://www.planetrock.com/newscentre/rock-news/slash-talks-album-number-2-1580

    http://slash.ultimate-guitar.com/news/new_update_88109.html

    all I want from a slash album is lots of GROOVE and a SHNIT LOAD OF SOLOING. As long as he solos his ass off like he did in gnr and snakepit then im happy. Preferably blues rock y'know, but whatever he wants to do - do a latin album, do a hip hop album - WHATEVER - just SOLO LIKE A MVTHERFUCCKER!!! and everyone will be happy (the solos were too short and uninspired on 'slash'.

  12. Hey mindsaber i've been reading your post for a while and i think you should go fuck yourself.

    You have no right saying what's good or what's wrong.

    Everyone has different thoughts and no one gives a fuck about yours, so stop bitching.

    Hey Mindsaber - I think you should go fuck yourself too. I also think you have no right saying what's good or what's wrong.

    My source? 'Izzy_Stradlin_XX'

    Thats about the same as asserting something about Axl and having it substantiated by only Axls own claims.

    Man you are a dumbass....

    Imagine making that shit flying in a court of law situation... 'why do you find the defendant innocent?'

    'because he says he is in his testimony! Read it you freakin idiot - he clearly says he's innocent and gives good reasons! I don't know why he'd say he was innocent if he wasn't! I certainly need no further proof than that!!!!'

    'What about the contrary evidence from all these other people?'

    'I don't care about that - I want to suck his balls'

  13. People here are are claiming Axl took advantage of his exbandmates as they all tell the same story of Axl's grab for control while Axl is the only one pushing his version of the truth....You chose to believe Axl which is your right but myself and many others in this thread chose to believe the version of the many, ex bandmates, others associated with the band, over the one, Axl..............We will just have to agree to disagree on this one...

    Slow_Clap_ITS_A_GIF_PARTY-s420x315-140048-580.gif

  14. Hey don't tell me you're not reading everything when I have to sift through all yer fucking words too, buddy. My post should take less than a minute to read.

    That certainly is an interesting point about Axl exploiting the situation, but I think it ignores much of the context at the time. Axl has openly stated that some in management were whispering sweet nothings into Slash's ear about getting Axl out of the band, among other things. I think this is verifiable from other sources too. There was a power struggle of sorts among all the various main players, plus things were chaotic on top of all that. Axl made a move to secure his position in the band, and yes take on a more prominent role in guiding the band. Things deteriorated after that, but they were already deteriorating prior to that, and that's a pertinent point.

    Ultimately, I don't think Axl hates Slash for the reasons you put forth in the opening post, bottom line. Is he spiting Slash? Sure. But not for the reasons you gave.

    fair enough. As you say, it was my opinion. I think they all have massive egos in guns n roses - they are too big for their fucking boots.

    In a way it is a shame that the old gnr albums still sell so well because if they didnt then they would have to reform and bring out new ones and tour like all the other la bands....

  15. Wow.... I knew you were a fucking nerd.

    If this is how you spend all your time it must hurt loose every arguement you attempt to me-a person who has never visited any type of forum before until last month.

    Here's what you can't argue.

    1. Axl ruined original guns by making it a dictatorship, demanding the rights to the name, hiring and firing w- out consulting band members, late starts, no shows, cancelled tours, running up tour tabs with extravigant parties ( that nobody attende but him and his sukboys), calling out band members drug use in the middle of shows, never taking responsibility for his actions, never writing as a BAND during illusions, not showing up to writing sessions for weeks, and thinking that he IS gnr and didn't need them.

    2. Axl still thinks about slash. He is in a lawsuit to remove his image from a video game right now rather than putting out his next "masterpeice". He freaks out in concerts if a fan says his name. He Put a whole song about him on his last album. He lives in the past.

    Most songs on Chinese democracy were just him whineing all over the mic.

    3. He calls him a sellout and a media whore.

    4. He never does interviews, fought for the name only to put out one record in fifteen years.

    5. He places gag orders on his muscians.

    6. He can't keep band members, managers, producers, women, and most importantly FANS.

    7. He is an all around douche bag as a human being which is why I see why you like him.

    8. Slash puts out records, talks to fans, has sponsorships, appears with other artist of all kinds, doesn't just play pentatonic scales, has alot of the same crew and friends he always has( which to me says alot in this case and speaks directly to his character).

    Is one of the biggest rock icon of all time for all generations.

    9. Axl is a recluse, acts like he does no wrong and bottom line takes everybody and everything for granted.

    I win the Internet. That's the stupidest shit I've ever heard .

    You don't win the Internet. But I OWN YOU.

    Prologue: I must "loose" every argument? No, my arguments are tight. Hah!

    1. Axl took control of the band because his junkie bandmembers and their associates in the record company were fucking everything up. Is Axl eccentric? Sure. But it's been so exaggerated by you and others that the truth has been obscured about what really went down in the early 90's. And ok, if you want to make a valid criticism that he was aloof from the band, so be it. Gee, could there be any possible reason he was apart? Maybe he didn't want any part of the scene that had developed. So he took a prominent role in the band's decisions and separated himself. Why the fuck did Slash sign the fucking name over? Oh you wanna get deep about this, we can get deep about this. WHY DID SLASH AND DUFF GIVE CONTROL TO AXL? That is the question you should be asking yourself. And when you answer it, it may illuminate other things as well.

    What your problem is is you're all caught up in the band name. Look at Van Halen: in that case, the brothers Van Halen retained the name. But DLR made some good Van Halen-esque songs on his solo records without Eddie, even though it wasn't called "Van Halen." Countless examples abound: band lineups change, things change. Look at Metallica. You've got the original 3 members and their latest album was a sincere attempt at returning to form, to quote Kirk Hammett. Well guess what? I'd rather have Chinese Democracy and Contraband over Death Magnetic any day of the week. You see- Axl and Slash's feud is propelling them to each create good music each in their own right.

    2. He's over Slash. It's other people who constantly remind him of Slash, and every now and then, he'll fire off a nice quote about Mister TopHat. To Axl, Slash is just another ex-band member. That's what you don't get. It's not that hard to believe or accept. No different than Steven Adler. No different than Chris Weber.

    3. Slash is a sell-out and a media whore. What's your point?

    4. Oh well, then I guess you'd better be moving along then, eh? He's reclusive, sue him. You think he owes you something, but he doesn't. He's smarter than you think.

    5. How can band members be gagged if they don't know what the plans are? What you fail to realize is that Guns n Roses is ethereal, they're gypsies: as are many musicans and groups. How GNR is operating is not some singularity. If you're lucky enough to catch them touring, very cool, be happy.

    6. He's kept band members for a while now. Managers mean jack shit. Producers come and go, big deal. Women? Yeeeeah, you keep telling yourself that.

    7. IF YOU BELIEVE THAT THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE? TELL ME. OH WAIT YOU CAN'T. Because it means you're either trolling, or you're a bitter asshole, hellbent on trolling this site. Take your pick.

    8. Slash has put out some decent blues rock records. Funny you would try to make some comment about "pentatonic scales" considering CD is much more varied than Libertad as far as guitar passages. mirite? You're right about one thing: Slash certainly is trying his damndest to make people notice him. This too, says a lot about his character.

    9. A recluse he may well be, but it matters not. He doesn't take people for granted- that's just you being on your period. Axl has strong convictions, and surprisingly, may be a sensitive person. As far as your dumbassed accusations of him taking things for granted, do you REALLY believe that's the case? The man whom you just called a recluse is also taking everything and everyone for granted? Doesn't quite jive, does it? Whoops.

    You don't own shit. You've had your ass so severely handed to you, all you can think to do is make haste towards tangents aplenty. You have no sense of humor, lest you wouldn't have made such a fool of yourself interpreting my "i win the internet" comment so literally. THAT WAS A COMMENT ON YOU DUMBASS. Do you hear a whooshing sound over your head? Heheh.

    ok, again, I didn't read all that shit, but I caught the bit where you say axl took control because his bandmates were out of control being out of their heads drug addicts - then you ask 'WHY DID SLASH SIGN THE BAND NAME OVER?

    DOES ANYBODY EVER GIVE CONSIDERATION TO THE THOUGHT THAT AXL EXPLOITED HIS BANDMATES DRUG ADDICTIONS IN THIS CASE?

    IF A PERSON IS HIGH ON DRUGS AND YOU ARE SOBER - IS IT RIGHT TO GUIDE THEIR HAND INTO SIGNING THEIR RIGHTS AWAY??

    THINK ABOUT IT...

    IS THAT SHIT RIGHT???

    THINK ABOUT IT MOTHERFUCKER......

    would you feel right about getting a drug addict to sign his house over to you for free??

    when he cleans up he's gonna regret that decision i rather think - and you will feel a fuck face for doing that to him.

  16. I hope to God that Mindsaber is a cupcake

    Hi there, yes, I too hope he is a cupcake. He sounds like a nut case. I skimmed through his stuff, didn't read it all, because it was a whole bunch of wild ranting - and I was just more than a bit freaked out by it.

    Glad you other guys have some sense.

    Oh and mindsaber or whatever the fvck your name is... you seem to think im some kind of slash fanboy, well, kind of, but I am also a big fan of axl rose.

    Im a guns N Roses fan.

    Not some kind of wild loony douchebag with an encyclopedic knowledge of bullshit.

  17. Hi there. Is there a reason you believe this post doesn't belong in the thread entitled "Is Slash still doing something that pisses off Axl?" which is one below this thread?

    Oh I get it, you just had to have a thread all to yourself. Carry on then.

    Also, you may want to brush up on your rock n roll history. All your grandiose exaggerations fall flat after a simple examination of many of the big rock bands of the 60's, 70's, and 80's. Pink Floyd, Deep Purple, Van Halen, Kiss, Hanoi Rocks, Black Sabbath, Ozzy, David Lee Roth. There are examples aplenty illustrating that lineup changes are a common thing in rock n roll.

    That's an awful lot of psychic knowledge you've amassed there. And cleverly veiled opinions disguised as facts. Next time don't be so transparent in your stealth trolling. Unfortunately, the evidence points to a different reality than the one you've conjured up in your mind.

    I am well aware of my rock n roll history thank you

    and all those bands you mentioned released albums while the bands were going through those changes - deep purple released burn with the change of only 2 members - pink floyd released saucer with the addition of gilmour while still having syd, van halen - 1 singer change etc etc

    they EVOLVED

    They didnt all get fed up with it - essentially deform and come back as a new band under the same name.

    LETS TAKE AN EXAMPLE YOU GAVE.

    Deep purple.

    They released a few albums with coverdale, but when the lineup changes got too much, what did they do???? THEY CHANGED THEIR NAME! YES, WHEN ALMOST ALL THE MEMBERS WERE NO LONGER ORIGINAL MEMBERS THEY BECAME WHITESNAKE.

    Thats what axl should have done.

    BOOM.

    YOU FAIL.

  18. Axl still loves Slash, but he cannot and will not admit that even to himself.

    He loved him as a brother in the early days of gnr, and they had a massive shnit up and Slash left.

    Kind of like a relationship (we know how Axl cannot get over relationships)

    Axls ego will not relent and admit any fault - he will not admit to doing ANYTHING wrong in the past (im not saying slash is without blame, but he seems to be more willing to work through problems).

    Axl has got to hate slash or he has got to admit faults. To admit faults would mean that the band COULD have continued, he COULD still have major success (apart from just sales based on name recognition) he COULD have a real band if slash was still there.

    In his heart axl knows what he is doing is kind of bogus - he just cant admit it and now its gone on soooo long that to back down now would make him look ridiculous (or so he thinks) because his ego is so big he doesnt want to lose face.

    HE DOESNT WANT TO LOSE FACE.

    Slash left, therefore - in Axls bi-polar mind he just becomes 'the enemy' in a kind of 'you are either with us or against us' kind of way. The only way axl feels he can keep respect is to be more successful than slash - create better music, sell more records and be more respected. He wants another classic album that sells like appetite to stuff slash's face in it - to go 'there, i did it without you - i didnt need you in the first place'.

    BUT AXL HASNT DONE THAT

    He is unuable to create as good music as he did with slash - he is unuable to have the hits and sell the records he did with slash and he must hate him for that also.

    He hates that he has to share some of the glory with someone else. He wants to take all the credit for everything ideally.

    THATS why he hates him. Because to think anything else would mess him up because his ego would get totally out of whack and he might have to admit some shnit.

    COME AT ME BRO.

  19. Hopefully there will be some cool people either side of me who wont mind my brother joining me later on. It's so wierd knowing by this time tomorrow I will be seeing them.

    So fucking excited!

    What time are people planning to queue? I'm getting a train from Canterbury at about midday so should be at the o2 by 2.

    Fingers crossed they play Shacklers like they have done past few dates, my brother's face will be priceless.

    you are getting to the 02 by 2!?!?! do you need to queue at the box office to get your ticket? surely it wont take that long!??! is there any other reasons to queue??

    im a lil worried now, cos ill be getting there for around 6pm. Should be ok???????..............

  20. Hi there.first post woo!!! Anyway, I will be going to the 02 gig tonight and was wondering if anybody knows what time Sebastian Bach has been going on stage recently on this tour? What songs has he been playing? I missed most of his set last time GnR were in London and i'm gonna try dammn hard not to miss it this time!!!!

    By the way, I have a seated ticket (in my hand), will there be a lot of queuing at the 02????

×
×
  • Create New...