SunnyDRE Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 (edited) I say:1. Elvis2. Beatles3. Micheal Jackson4.Rolling Stones5. Led Zepplin6. U27. Nirvana8. Madonna9. Guns N Roses10. Tupac Edited May 4, 2009 by SunnyDRE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin' Jack Flash Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 (edited) 1. Led Zeppelin2. The Rolling Stones3. AC/DC4. Rush5. The Who6. Pink Floyd7. Van Halen8. Nirvana9. Guns N' Roses 10. The DoorsNot my favourite bands, but my opinion.My favourite bands would be:1. AC/DC2. Led Zeppelin3. Rush4. The Who5. Nirvana6. Van Halen tied with The Rolling Stones7. Pink Floyd tied The Jimi Hendrix Experience8. Guns N' Roses tied withThe Doors9. Black Sabbath10 Wolfmother tied with Alice in Chains Edited May 4, 2009 by Jumpin' Jack Flash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetchupNotMayo Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 1) The Beatles2) Elvis3) The Rolling Stones4) Led Zeppelin5) Queen6) Pink Floyd7) The Who8) AC/DC9) Guns N' Roses10) Metallica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Satanisk_Slakt Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 1. The Beatles2. Michael Jackson3. Elvis4. The Rolling Stones5. ABBA6. AC/DC7. Led Zeppelin8. Queen9. Pink Floyd10. Madonna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zion Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Of all genres?1. Elvis2. The Beatles3. Micheal Jackson4. Madonna5. Led Zepplin6. Bob Marley7. The Bee Gee's8. Pink Floyd9. The Rolling Stones10. The Beach Boys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Utah Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 All I know is, Nirvana shouldn't be ahead of Guns N Roses (original) on any list. I'm not saying Nirvana wasn't good, but no way do they deserve to be ahead of GNR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Satanisk_Slakt Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 I'd rather say that Guns N' Roses shouldn't be on a list of the biggest bands of all time. Especially when he points out that it's not a list with his favourites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin' Jack Flash Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 I'd rather say that Guns N' Roses shouldn't be on a list of the biggest bands of all time. Especially when he points out that it's not a list with his favourites. Thank You Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunnyDRE Posted May 4, 2009 Author Share Posted May 4, 2009 (edited) All I know is, Nirvana shouldn't be ahead of Guns N Roses (original) on any list. I'm not saying Nirvana wasn't good, but no way do they deserve to be ahead of GNR.I think Nirvana had more of cultural impact then GNR ever did.Don't get me wrong, I think GNR where big...........but not Nirvana big. Edited May 4, 2009 by SunnyDRE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 No-one mentioned Julio Iglesias so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Blaze Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 (edited) Nirvana shouldn't be on any top ten list of the biggest bands/artists of all time. Edited May 5, 2009 by Johnny Blaze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin' Jack Flash Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 No-one mentioned Julio Iglesias so far.Damn, forgot about him Nirvana shouldn't be on any top ten list of the biggest bands/artists of all time.Oh. Sorry about that. I didn't get the memo it seems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artfromtex Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 (edited) ElvisBeatlesMJZeppelinStonesBee GeesMadonnaABBAAC/DCThe Eagles Edited May 5, 2009 by artfromtex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunnyDRE Posted May 5, 2009 Author Share Posted May 5, 2009 (edited) Nirvana shouldn't be on any top ten list of the biggest bands/artists of all time.To me, it is hard to deny the impact Nirvana has had on "music culture" for over close to the last 20 years.........even if you don't like them. Edited May 5, 2009 by SunnyDRE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightningBolt Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 I dunno really, but here's ten...The BeatlesElvisMichael JacksonThe Rolling StonesLed ZeppelinPink FloydAC/DCMadonnaMetallicaI think Metallica was the best selling Rock band of the 90's, right? I dunno. And my list isn't in any specific order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Eyes Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 The BeatlesMichael JacksonThe Rolling StonesElvis PresleyAC/DCLed ZeppelinABBAU2The Beach BoysThe Eagles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Utah Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 All I know is, Nirvana shouldn't be ahead of Guns N Roses (original) on any list. I'm not saying Nirvana wasn't good, but no way do they deserve to be ahead of GNR.I think Nirvana had more of cultural impact then GNR ever did.Don't get me wrong, I think GNR where big...........but not Nirvana big.Can you please describe what exactly this "cultural impact" was? And how exactly that would make them bigger than Guns N Roses were? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carsonskitz Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 bob dylan surely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santana Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 Can you please describe what exactly this "cultural impact" was? And how exactly that would make them bigger than Guns N Roses were?Cobain made a bunch of 15-year-olds cry when he killed himself. I guess that's what they're trying to pass off as cultural impact these days.On a side note, has anyone mentioned Elton John in this thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gods Favourite Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 I say:1. Elvis2. Beatles3. Micheal Jackson4.Rolling Stones5. Led Zepplin6. U27. Nirvana8. Madonna9. Guns N Roses10. TupacTupac over a band like... let's say Queen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lithium Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 I say:1. Elvis2. Beatles3. Micheal Jackson4.Rolling Stones5. Led Zepplin6. U27. Nirvana8. Madonna9. Guns N Roses10. TupacBased on what, sales? In that case, most of your lists are wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lithium Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 Can you please describe what exactly this "cultural impact" was? And how exactly that would make them bigger than Guns N Roses were?Cobain made a bunch of 15-year-olds cry when he killed himself. I guess that's what they're trying to pass off as cultural impact these days.No, opening the doors for alternative music and thus influencing a lot of the major rock bands today is what they pass of as a cultural impact these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Utah Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 (edited) Can you please describe what exactly this "cultural impact" was? And how exactly that would make them bigger than Guns N Roses were?Cobain made a bunch of 15-year-olds cry when he killed himself. I guess that's what they're trying to pass off as cultural impact these days.No, opening the doors for alternative music and thus influencing a lot of the major rock bands today is what they pass of as a cultural impact these days. Alternative music was already popular or on its way to being. So strike that. They influenced a really shitty period in popular rock, so strike against them for that too. Got anything else? Edited May 5, 2009 by Johnny Utah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunnyDRE Posted May 5, 2009 Author Share Posted May 5, 2009 (edited) All I know is, Nirvana shouldn't be ahead of Guns N Roses (original) on any list. I'm not saying Nirvana wasn't good, but no way do they deserve to be ahead of GNR.I think Nirvana had more of cultural impact then GNR ever did.Don't get me wrong, I think GNR where big...........but not Nirvana big.Can you please describe what exactly this "cultural impact" was? And how exactly that would make them bigger than Guns N Roses were?Nirvana pretty much invented the word "Alternative"......good or bad.If you look up Alternative in the dictionary, you'll see Nirvana.Guns didn't have that kind of impact.Can you please describe what exactly this "cultural impact" was? And how exactly that would make them bigger than Guns N Roses were?Cobain made a bunch of 15-year-olds cry when he killed himself. I guess that's what they're trying to pass off as cultural impact these days.No, opening the doors for alternative music and thus influencing a lot of the major rock bands today is what they pass of as a cultural impact these days. Alternative music was already popular or on its way to being. So strike that. They influenced a really shitty period in popular rock, so strike against them for that too. Got anything else?Not it wasn't.Alternative = Feeling sorry for your self music, was not popular until Nirvana. Edited May 5, 2009 by SunnyDRE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lithium Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 Yeah, of course it had been brewing for a while and gotten more and more popular; I'm not saying it got changed over night. But Nirvana delivered what was needed to get a connection between pop and alternative music. Whether you find the music they influenced "shitty" is irrelevant to the discussion - they still influenced it no matter how much you dislike it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.