DustnRoses Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 apparantly he backed out of a deal to pay $2.36 million for an andy warhol painting of john lennon.http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,214978,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Almost Famous Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 Old news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DustnRoses Posted September 22, 2006 Author Share Posted September 22, 2006 oops didnt know it was already on here. just saw it on the news ticker on court tv. how do i close this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamme Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 My question is why is Merck named in the suit as a defendant .. that means that it's not just Axl being sued ... yet i can't find anymore documentation, want to read the whol doc before making judgement ... no speculation, but no one agrees to drop $2 plus million on a painting, pays for half of it then says they don't have the money ... Case Number: SC091039ACQUIRE D'ARTE VS. W. AXL ROSE ET. AL.Filing Date: 09/11/2006Case Type: Contractural Fraud (General Jurisdiction)Status: Pending--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Future Hearings 01/05/2007 at 08:30 am in department WEC at 1633 Purdue Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90025Initial Status Conference--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Documents Filed | Proceeding InformationParties ACQUIRE D'ARTE - PlaintiffMERCURIADIS MERCK - DefendantROSE W. AXL - DefendantSTEINER & SAFFER - Attorney for Plaintiff--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding InformationDocuments Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)09/11/2006 Complaint Filed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bandita Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 At least they were nice enough to make the court date after the NA tour is supposed to end!Maybe Merck was involved in the dealing for the art? Who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamme Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 I have my own theories about Merck's involvement, but I'll to myself ... Axl like's art, just like he used the Kostabi painting for UYI 1 and 2, and now wanting to buy a painting of John Lennon, while having a song supposedly about him, and a movie on Lennon coming out in early 2007 .. starring Lindsey Lohan .. Hope Axl gets his 1.15 million back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pl Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 there is a documentary on andy warhol right now on pbs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madison Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 This is old news. Please use the existing thread that's already been posted on this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts