Ace Nova

55 minutes ago, downzy said:

@Ace Nova - doesn’t seem as though things are improving in the ways you predicted. 

Yes, it's unfortunate but I still feel it's mostly "reactionary".  

If there was a poll asking if Trump won the 2016 election because of Russian collusion, wouldn't the vast majority of Democrats say "yes"?

The reality is that although there is evidence of Russian interference, there is little to no evidence of direct collusion by Trump. So to say that Trump won the election because of "Russian collusion" wouldn't be accurate.  Did he win because of Russian interference?   That's anyone's guess.  But it certainly isn't  "proven".  

Two completely different circumstances but with the same type of "reactionary" results.   And before you go on about how "there was actual evidence of interference in the 2016 election and there was little to no evidence of massive voter fraud in the 2020 election"...I will say that I agree.   

The point is that most Democrats still believe that Trump won the 2016 election because of collusion and/or interference.  Although Democrats can point to evidence, etc...it's far from proven.....but they still believe it.

11 minutes ago, SoulMonster said:

They still have the right to believe and say what they like. But they can't expect to be allowed to say whatever they like everywhere. Freedom to speech has never been total in that sense. And as a private company, Twitter is free to kick out anyone they want. Don't confuse this with their freedom to speech being violated. 

Also, do not forget, "Freedom of Speech" only goes so far.  For example, yelling "Fire" in a crowded movie theater (when there is no fire)  will still get you arrested.  Inciting a riot or inciting an all out rebellion are likely not protected under "Freedom of Speech".

My 1st post in the new thread.  I'm in. 

On 1/4/2021 at 10:35 AM, SoulMonster said:

Technically no, these are European brown trout, but as far as I know they look very much the same.

Yes, they are very similar and taste similar as well.  The reason I asked is because I used to go Trout fishing several times a week during Trout season when I was younger.  It was a true passion/hobby of mine. 

On 8/23/2020 at 11:49 AM, SoulMonster said:

Not right now, just returned from this little fishing trip. 

Very nice.  Are those rainbow trout?

 

This seems interesting...and backed by "scientific" observations made by a Harvard professor... 

A Harvard professor says an alien visited in 2017 — and more are coming

 

When the first sign of intelligent life first visits us from space, it won’t be a giant saucer hovering over New York. More likely, it will be an alien civilization’s trash. 

Avi Loeb, the chair of Harvard’s Department of Astronomy, believes he’s already found some of that garbage. 

In his upcoming book, “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt), out Jan. 26, the professor lays out a compelling case for why an object that recently wandered into our solar system was not just another rock but actually a piece of alien technology. 

The object in question traveled toward our solar system from the direction of Vega, a nearby star 25 light-years away, and intercepted our solar system’s orbital plane on Sept. 6, 2017. 

On Sept. 9, its trajectory brought it closest to the sun. At the end of September, it blasted at about 58,900 miles per hour past Venus’ orbital distance, and then, on Oct. 7, it shot past Earth’s before “moving swiftly toward the constellation Pegasus and the blackness beyond,” Loeb writes in the book. 

The object was first spotted by an observatory in Hawaii containing the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) — the highest definition telescope on earth. 

The space object was dubbed ‘Oumuamua (pronounced “oh moo ah moo ah”), which is Hawaiian for — roughly — “scout.” 

As space travelers go, it was relatively small at just about 100 yards long, but it was a big deal in the scientific community. 

For starters, it was the first interstellar object ever detected inside our solar system. Judging from the object’s trajectory, astronomers concluded it was not bound by the sun’s gravity — which suggested it was just traveling through. 

No crisp photos could be taken, but astronomers were able to train their telescopes on the object for 11 days, collecting reams of other data. 

 

At first, scientists thought it was an ordinary comet. But Loeb said that assumption ran the risk of allowing “the familiar to define what we might discover.” 

“What would happen if a caveman saw a cellphone?” he asked. “He’s seen rocks all his life, and he would have thought it was just a shiny rock.” 

Loeb soon opened his mind to another possibility: It was not a comet but discarded tech from an alien civilization. 

A number of unusual properties about the object helped Loeb make this conclusion. 

First were ‘Oumuamua’s dimensions. 

Astronomers looked at the way the object reflected sunlight. Its brightness varied tenfold every eight hours, suggesting that was the amount of time it took for it to complete a full rotation. 

Scientists concluded the object was at least five to ten times longer than it was wide — sort of like the shape of a cigar. 

No naturally occurring space body we’ve ever seen has looked like it — or even close. 

“This would make ‘Oumuamua’s geometry more extreme by at least a few times in aspect ratio — or its width to its height — than the most extreme asteroids or comets that we have ever seen,” Loeb writes in his book. 

What’s more, ‘Oumuamua was unusually bright. It was at least “ten times more reflective than typical solar system [stony] asteroids or comets,” the author writes. 

He likens its surface to that of shiny metal. 

But the anomaly that really pushed Loeb toward his E.T. hypothesis was the way ‘Oumuamua moved. 

“The excess push away from the sun — that was the thing that broke the camel’s back,” he said. 

Using physics, scientists can calculate the exact path an object should take and what speed it should travel due to the gravitational force exerted by the sun. The sun’s pull will speed up an object massively as it gets closer, then kick it out the other side, only for the object to slow considerably as it gets farther away. 

But ‘Oumuamua didn’t follow this calculated trajectory. The object, in fact, accelerated “slightly, but to a highly statistically significant extent,” Loeb writes, as it moved away from the sun. 

In other words, it was clearly being pushed by a force besides the sun’s gravity alone. 

At first the explanation seemed simple. Comets show a similar acceleration, because as they approach the sun, their surface is warmed, releasing once-frozen gases, which act like a rocket engine. 

Those released materials, however, form a comet’s distinctive tail. Scientists looked carefully for that tail or any sign of gases or dust that might propel ‘Oumuamua and came up empty. 

Loeb calculated that with these and other anomalies, the chances that ‘Oumuamua was some random comet was around one in a quadrillion, leading him to his blockbuster hypothesis. 

But what was it exactly? 

One possibility, weirdly enough, could be found in technology we already have here on earth. 

Some 400 years ago, astronomer Johannes Kepler observed comet tails blowing in what looked like a solar breeze and wondered if that same force could propel rocket ships through space like the wind pushes boats through water. 

It was a smart idea that scientists now use to develop light sails for probes. Thin, reflective sheeting is unfurled in space to capture the particles streaming off the sun, propelling a ship at great speeds through the empty void. Alternatively, powerful lasers from earth could be aimed at the sail to make it go even faster. 

Artist’s impression of possible shapes for `Oumuamua. Some experts believe it’s cigar shaped (above right) but Loeb contends it looks more like a sail (left).

Loeb, who is involved in a light-sail project to send a tiny, unmanned craft to a nearby star, said if we earthlings have thought of this idea, then why couldn’t aliens? 

He and a colleague crunched the numbers and hypothesized that ‘Oumuamua was not actually cigar-shaped but possibly a disk less than a millimeter thick, with sail-like proportions that would account for its unusual acceleration as it moved away from the sun. 

As to its purpose, Loeb isn’t entirely sure. He speculated it could be “space junk” that once served as a kind of space navigation buoy used by a long-ago civilization. 

“The only way to look for [alien civilizations] is to look for their trash, like investigative journalists who look through celebrities’ trash,” Loeb said. 

Of course, not everyone in the scientific community agrees with his theory. 

In July 2019, the ‘Oumuamua Team of the International Space Science Institute published an article in Nature Astronomy concluding, “We find no compelling evidence to favor an alien explanation for ‘Oumuamua.” 

Loeb admits his theories have raised astronomers’ eyebrows, but he is resolute about his findings. “Some people do not want to discuss the possibility that there are other civilizations out there,” he told The Post. “They believe we are special and unique. I think it’s a prejudice that should be abandoned.” 

Loeb said the skeptics are bending over backwards to assign natural origins to the object and that the explanations they’ve given to explain its weird properties don’t stand up to scrutiny. 

For example, some scientists have suggested that ‘Oumuamua’s acceleration was caused by frozen hydrogen on its surface turning to gas and driving it like a comet, and that hydrogen would have been invisible to Earth’s infrared cameras, which is why we didn’t detect it. 

But Loeb and a colleague published a paper showing that “a hydrogen iceberg traveling through interstellar space would evaporate long before it reached our solar system.” 

Whatever the truth, the stakes are high. 

The acceptance that an alien race has made contact — even through its trash — would trigger a serious search for more trash, leading us to scour the moon and Mars, for example, for debris that might have crash-landed thousands or millions of years ago. 

And if more evidence is found, we earthlings would have to start building tools to help us grapple with extraterrestrials, such as space treaties and academic fields like astro-linguistics and astro-economics. 

But, perhaps more important, any further discoveries could redefine our place in the universe. 

“It would put us in perspective,” Loeb said. “If we are not alone, are we the smartest kids on the block? If there was a species that eliminated itself through war or changing the climate, we can get our act together and behave better. Instead, we are wasting a lot of resources on Earth fighting each other and other negative things that are a big waste.” 

Since ‘Oumuamua’s appearance, a second interstellar object known as 2I/Borisov was spotted entering the solar system by a Crimean telescope in 2019. But that turned out to be a plain old comet. 

Until recently, our instruments have not been sensitive enough to pick up these kinds of visitors. But Loeb said technology will soon make it possible to locate more space travelers, and the only way the mystery of ‘Oumuamua will be settled is if a similar object is spotted and more thoroughly investigated with a probe. 

He said his book “should motivate people to collect more data on the next object that looks weird.” 

“If we find another and we take a photo and it looks like a light sail, I don’t think anyone will argue with that.”

 

https://nypost.com/2021/01/02/a-harvard-professor-says-an-alien-visited-in-2017/?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&sr_share=facebook&utm_source=NYPFacebook&utm_medium=SocialFlow&fbclid=IwAR0yvrjcBRSX2MnskIXRvR0xCey7YWZxTWMaZGqbvGs2FTA9xCGWyFoCTG0

5 hours ago, Basic_GnR_Fan said:

I actually didn't know about this case until recently (maybe I had heard of it before but just forgot about it) but for you Britbongs, there was a famous incident in 1990 in Calvine.

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/6144270/ufo-sighting-cavine-scotland-aliens-ministry-of-defence/

 

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/secret-ufo-dossier-1990-scottish-22824456

 

Well isn't that just a kick in the dick!

I don't get it.  What type of reasoning do they have to "seal it" for another 50 years?  To protect the witnesses?  National security?  

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Great news, Kaiser Foundation's most recent survey stated that 71% of those surveyed are willing to take the vaccine.  If that's the case, true herd immunity should work.  

I actually laughed out loud...

 

 

 

27 minutes ago, Len Cnut said:

No Holds Barred with Hulk Hogan (fair dues, that was a piece of shit ), Two of the Friday movies, Jackie Brown, Universal Soldier, Gang Related, TONS of others, ones people have seen a lot of and like, cult classics.

I just looked up his profile because I remembered him being in a bunch of films.  In addition to the ones you listed, he was in all of the following...

-He played 1st ever Klingon to meet a human on Star Trek Enterprise

- Batman The Dark Night  (Prisoner)

- Matlock (Bodyguard)

- Austin Powers Goldmember 

- Human Centipede 3

-  The Fifth Element

-  Little Nicky (His older brother)

- Busy Day

- Disney's Zootopia as the voice of Fennec Fox

- Several music videos 

 

He was born with a detached retina so he was blind in his right eye from birth.  Born in Compton, he went on to college and became the National NCAAII shot put champion.  The rest is history. 

Inspirational story.  An African American, born blind in one eye, in one of the toughest neighborhoods in the entire U.S., goes on to not only graduate college but to have both a professional wrestling and acting career...and became an easily recognizable and likeable personality from his movies..

 

 

Oh, and how could we forget....we already have a thread named after his movie in this very section!  

I wasn't sure who you were talking about when I read the thread title so I didn't click on it.  I immediately knew who it was as soon as I saw the first post, didn't need to play the video.  He was a unique, one of a kind "role" actor and he did it very well.  He was in several movies, from what I recall...and usually played the "big serious guy" that did not mess around.  Funny when he needed to be funny and serious when he needed to look serious.  And yes, I also remember him from his WWF/WWE days....he was one of the top guys for at least a few years. 

He'll be missed....and thank you for the memories, may you move forward in your eternal journey. 

1.