Jump to content

Desperado

Members
  • Posts

    2,979
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Desperado

  1. Well it depends. Like in Walk it's still awesome when the solo kicks in and there is no other guitar. I even think that it can sound awesome in many songs where there is just bass keeping the flow and a guitar solo over it. But in Guns I like when they have 3 guitars but it would be better if they didn't have DJ. I know Robin played alot of wrong notes but at least he had a style, would be awesome if he would be in the band again and that he only plays his own solos and his amazing rhythms and that Ron and Fortus plays the rest of the solos.... but mostly Ron :P

  2. One guitar will never sound right unless it's a very simple song. The song will sound empty at times and will sound retardedwhen there's a solo.

    ....what about Pantera, Dream Theatre, Ozzy Osbounes band (all different line-ups), Queen, Nirvana, Muse, The Who and the heaviest band of all time Black Sabbath? they all sound good with just one guitarist (bad or not is a different thing).

    I agree that it usually sounds better with two or more guitarists but not always.

    The songs those bands are playing WILL sound empty at times and whenever there's a solo there will be no aggressiveness. I never said it doesnt work, you guys simply did not understand what I said. Unless, of course, the guitarist decides to play rhythm and lead at once when he's soloing it will not sound right.

    Do you guys remember when Ron played the Dont Cry solo instead of Ashba? He played rhythm and lead at the same time so the song wouldnt sound... guess what? Empty. You hear when Ashba does some licks instead of the thythm on Patience (The 'just a little patience' bit) the whole rhythm sounds empty until he's done with the licks? That's what Im talking about.

    I understand what you're talking about but I don't completely agree with you :P I think that the solo in Walk is great and the bass is the only thing that needs to keep the flow going. And Matts solo parts in Muse (mostly live, but they also have massive keyboards).

  3. One guitar will never sound right unless it's a very simple song. The song will sound empty at times and will sound retardedwhen there's a solo.

    ....what about Pantera, Dream Theatre, Ozzy Osbounes band (all different line-ups), Queen, Nirvana, Muse, The Who and the heaviest band of all time Black Sabbath? they all sound good with just one guitarist (bad or not is a different thing).

    I agree that it usually sounds better with two or more guitarists but not always.

  4. Well three is always better than 2 right....but it only produced one album....that is not better then their past albums....

    well that doesn't really have anything to do with it, and on CD there's even 5 (or more) guitar players playing and alot different people made the music and not just three of the guitar players. And on the old albums Slash layered his guitar tracks and often played 2 different guitar parts at the same time. But they just had two guitar players in their band so he couldn't recreate all the guitar parts live.

  5. Thank you, but I love Axl, I really do and you know that, but he's not doing well. On a good day I could agree with you, but Axl is having bad nights after bad nights to the point that I'm afraid it's not a bad night anymore, but a good night. If Bridge School was a bad night and the Vegas residency a "good night", I'll be sad. If he's already better now (which I really hope so!), great.

    This is the difference between an Axl Rose fan and an Axl Rose nutter. Very well said Bruno.

    Thank you, man, but I dont really know how anyone can deny that Axl's having a bad night every night, lol.

    exactly. 2-3% of everything he sings every night sounds good and the rest isn't allways bad but it's much worse then it should be.

×
×
  • Create New...