Jump to content

RNRS

Members
  • Posts

    513
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RNRS

  1. I keep thinking this album isnt going to have a release date. They arent going to say "ok, the albums coming out now". I think there will just be rumours from shops of people getting big crates of this triple boxset thing and then they be putting them on the selves. And we'll all be sprinting down the road to get to the bitch. Then it would be the album that never had a relsease date.

    It seems like a long shot...but...it...might...just...work.

    It's not a triple album, and it's impossible not to have a release date. :|

  2. that would be fun to watch.

    what would piss me off and it probably will happen with MTV is that they better not let axl lose to such a loser like scott weiland.

    Ron Thal vs Buckethead guys!

    COME ON!!!

    Oh yeah, something like that is not supposed to happen. The singer who's got his life back on track, is rocking his ass off and is working on a follow up is not supposed to lose from a singer who destroyed one of the biggest bands in the world!

    I mean, it's fucking pathetic how people keep licking Axl's balls while he's done about nothing compared to Scott Weiland but keep putting Weiland down for no fucking reason. Just get over it. :unsure:

  3. Izzy wasn't there.

    Oh yeah, you should know man, you probably was there.. right?

    It was like..crazy :D

    a little axl rant.. about why he doenst talk that much on stage anymore.. 'well, cause I'm too darn happy'

    No, due to the location I couldn't be there. Next time, Ahoy or something like that, please. But people were talking about Izzy being there while he hadn't showed up yet, that's why I said he wasn't there. :)

  4. Main Set

    Chinese Democracy, Better, It's So Easy, Mr. Brownstone, Dead Horse, Live and Let Die, Madagascar, Sweet Child O' Mine, My Michelle, Double Talkin Jive, Estranged, (solos), Out Ta Get Me, I.R.S., Yesterdays, Civil War, Don't Cry, There Was A Time (or Catcher in the Rye), You Could Be Mine, Rocket Queen

    Encore 1

    The Blues, 14 Years (w/ Izzy), Patience (w/ Izzy), Nighttrain (w/ Izzy)

    Encore 2

    Axl Piano Solo, November Rain, Welcome To The Jungle

    Fuck Paradise City and Knockin On Heavens Door right off the bat... so overplayed. If there were any solos, i'd scale them down and put them in one spot, so its almost like an intermission. Throw in a new opener and change the closer. Get more songs in the set that Axl wrote, more Illusion, stuff has relevance to the band NOW: Dead Horse, 14 Years, Yesterdays, DTJ, Civil War, Dont Cry. Also make the set around the new songs, instead of Appetite. Axl comes out in the 2nd encore by himself, talks to the crowd, does a piano solo... band goes into November and closes with WTTJ.... hows that for BEAUIFUL!?

    I like your idea but you've got way too many ballads/slow songs in your set. Yesterdays, Civil War, Don't Cry, TWAT after another would make the gig pretty slow I think. But you've made a very good point.

  5. Big bertha, axl has 3 cd's to release, hes gonna drop one each year. thats what he said.

    thanks mate...thats news to me

    It's what he said in 2002, and they'd probably be released in 2003. Well yeah, it didn't really work out that way now did it?

  6. Fuck off you newbie cunt, don't hit the "your banned" sign on the way out with your head.

    Again, there's no need for such language. If you hate the way the debates go in the discussions that lead to negative things about Axl, why do you actually use such language yourself? And just because I do not have that many posts under my name, doesn't mean I haven't been reading this board for a long time. Your behaviour is just silly.

  7. You can't have it all you're own way. You either want Guns N' Roses to have a successful come back or you don't because you hope for a fucking reunion which ain't happening for the millionth time and no Axl won't drop the name either so give it up.

    Why keep going on and on and on and fucking on about how the "new" GN'R are not as good as the old GN'R and "they should drop the name" or "Axl sounds rubbish". Nobody actually cares about your pathetic input and do you think Axl does? Of course not and he will never see it either. Guns N' Roses are back, fact. Now puss off if you can't get that through your thick fucking skull.

    Guns N' Roses aren't back, Axl and his solo project is back and has called it Guns N' Roses. Fact. Now you puss off if you can't get thát through your thick fucking skull.

    There's no need for language like that. It's pathetic. And why should anyone care about your "pathetic" input? What makes your opinion more valid than the ones from the people who don't like the entire Axl project? I'm not saying I do not support Axl, but in a way they're right, and it's sad that a lot of Axl supporters do not see it that way and just blindly support Axl. If they'd just accept it and say "yes, you are right, but we like what Axl does" there'd be no discussion at all. Instead, you lot must defend everything Axl does, even though a lot of you know it doesn't make sense.

    Your bashing isn't any better or worse than the bashing in the other topics.

  8. TWAT is not a song to play live. Like madagascar , its to boring. Pepole want rock when they are at conserts and not emo ballads.

    Its ok to listen to it, but i dont go to a GNR consert to get bored.

    Yeah sure, yet you don't complain about November Rain, or would shit your pants if they'd play Estranged so hush you mofo.

  9. look they asked some questions, maybe it wasn't really in depth Questions, but I didn't mind, and it was not a interview, and that would of been dumb anyway if they just asked him heaps of questions, they hadn't spoken to Axl for a while, Sebastian and Axl hadn't seen each other for years, they were shocked Axl actually came to the studio and they were enjoying that he was there talking to them.

    They asked him if he wanted to come to the studio and hang with them, not to do an interveiw. And that is what Axl did, he went to just hang with them and have a chat and he answered some questions to.

    I'm not saying what Axl Rose did was wrong or anything, I'm saying that Eddie Trunk makes a lot more of it than it actually was. He pretends like he had this deep chat with Axl about Chinese Democracy, the tour and all that stuff, and makes it look like fans who didn't hear it missed a lot. While in fact they didn't. The questions that were asked regarding the whole Chinese Democracy progress could be asked in 5 minutes. Eddie makes more of it, so fans will request the interview, and Eddie knows that if other radio stations ask for the segments, he'll be making more money. That's my point.

  10. they were doing both. it was cool

    No they weren't. I haven't heard one in depth question. Sure, Axl made a few things clear like the extra guitar player and stuff like that, but no way it was an in depth interview. I found them annoying to listen to. The anecdotes Axl came up were nice, but all those stories about them seeing GnR at Giants made me want to puke. They were all up to Axl's ass.

  11. I was the first to play the new music years ago, and now the first to have an in depth interview with the legend himself! Still can't get your local station to broadcast my show? LET THEM KNOW ABOUT IT! You would have heard this live!!

    And in depth radio interview? What the fuck is that all about? The guys were more talking about themselves and their GnR experience than about the actual GnR stuff. :|

  12. For fucks sake. Just a suggestion to the admin. Make a separate forum in which every member can put their "there will be a reunion" topics. In this way this forum with general chat will not be spoiled each week with the same sort of nonsense. :rolleyes:

    Here's an idea, captain balls breath. If you hate reunion threads so much, quit fucking reading them. and for christ's sake, don't bother posting how you're tired of posting about them.

    plenty of us want a reunion. we've been waiting for it since Axl ate those dolphins and got fat. it seems like it's finally happening. I know that breaks you're heart because you wanted to hear some random studio musicians play Oh My God, but don't get mad at me for it. I'm not reuniting Guns. I'm just celebrating what's obviously taking place.

    I never said I didn't want a reunion. But it is silly to think that every little thing that could be taken into relation with that possible reunion of everybody who wants it so bad. Face it, it's not going to happen anytime soon. And getting a new topic about it while it's just an old discussion re done. That is why I said the thing I said. And therefore, like someobody else said, it should be in Dust N' Bones. If you disagree with me, what exactly is new about this topic about a reunion that has not been discussed before? Another users view who thinks he knows what is going on?

    Velvet Revolver is writing and recording for a new album. Slash is part of Velvet Revolver. End of story. But not for a lot of you. Just because he didn't say anything about the GnR reunion, must mean that he's part of the GnR reunion! What sort of logic is that? :|

  13. For fucks sake. Just a suggestion to the admin. Make a separate forum in which every member can put their "there will be a reunion" topics. In this way this forum with general chat will not be spoiled each week with the same sort of nonsense. :rolleyes:

  14. When they were anounced to play the Gelredome stadium in Arnhem back in 2001 I think it was, the venue wasn't sold out. That venue holds about 30.000 people. So I don't think they'll sell out the Goffertpark. But it's great news though, I'll be there!

  15. Who gives a fuck about what NME writes anyway? The fact that they give TWAT a positive review doesn't make it a better review anyway when you think they got most of their "facts" wrong, which probably means that the one who wrote it knows nothing about music. With their "band insider" nonsense. Anyone could come up with such theories.

×
×
  • Create New...