Jump to content

Freightrain

Members
  • Posts

    131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Freightrain

  1. 52 minutes ago, Homefuck said:

    Technically better, yes. But, to me, sometimes when guitar players get more Technically proficient they can somewhat lose the magic they once had. I haven't heard much of the myles Kennedy-stuff, but can it be that the presence of Fortus has made slash more of a "noodler"? Since Fortus is a very technical and fast player, perhaps slash doesn't want to be the "slow hands" of the band and therefore he's playing a lot of fast runs where he earlier would focus on sustaining notes and playing a melody? Just a hypothesis. 

    That and trying to fill the bucketbumbleheadfoot shoes (both virtuosos)

    • Like 1
  2. On 16/5/2018 at 5:17 PM, Order of Nine said:

    First reminds me of Radiohead, the overhead mics on the drums seem way to hot, but possibly helps it to rock a little.  Bands like this, Marron 5, the killers, Coldplay, radiohead that type of thing it's just quirky pop that trys to rock but never fully takes flight inmho. Outta that batch I'd say the killers rock the most cause thier drummer actually creates that energy. 

    I can get into Radiohead and the killers I love ok computer and the killers first release, but each are more easy listening pop more then they could ever care to admit 

    Play this track before SOYL and I'm sure you'll notice the energy level difference. 

    Too Whiny To Rock

  3. 14 hours ago, estrangedtwat said:

    Leave them alone guys.

    They obviously NEED it to be Axl.  Their lives; their very universe must depend on it.

    Despite all the evidence to the contrary right in front of their fucking stupid faces they still insist this is a "demo" and it's "been around since the 90s."

    Let the fucking retards believe what they want.  Anyone with two functioning brain cells that can read English knows the truth about this piano cover.

    Hey motherfucker , just cause this thing wasn't around in the 90's, and some fuckin random guy claims he did it .... It does not mean shit 

    Maybe you are the one that can't live with the idea of not having it back in the day

    Suck a fkn dick 

  4. 23 minutes ago, gnfnr2k said:

     

    Its fake, if it was legit it would be on some GNR import CD like all the other demos from that time period. You don't find it weird that this one demo was only found online?

     

    People need to use their brain.

     

     

    Weird maybe , imposible ?? No 

    Maybe you should use your ears 

    Are you gonna tell me that the intro to NR in las vegas 2001 it's not the same on that Estranged demo ???

  5. 10 minutes ago, TheRipper75 said:

     

    Well from what I've read it's been said that all Axl knew how to play on Piano was November Rain, Tracii Guns  said the following " When we were doing that EP for L.A. Guns, like ‘83? He was playing “November Rain” — and it was called “November Rain” — you know, on piano. Way back then, it was the only thing he knew how to play, but it was his. He’d go, “Someday this song is gonna be really cool.” And I’d go, “It’s cool now.” “But it’s not done”, you know, he used to say. And, like, anytime we’d be at a hotel or anywhere, there’d be a piano; he’d just kinda play that music. And I’d go, “When are you gonna finish that already”, you know? And he’d go, “I don’t know what to do with it.”

    :facepalm:. 1983 !!

  6. This was on the old post , and i'm shocked that nobody hear that it's the SAME intro only in this case for NR.

    Still thinking it's not Axl ??

     

    And besides, just because some guy claims that he made it doesn't mean shit. There's zero evidence that Víctor did it. 

  7. 30 minutes ago, Live Like a Suicide said:

    I thought you were going to point to this:

    Which does have parts strikingly similar to This I Love. I have included an instrumental track of This I Love below. Note that there are parts which correlate with the Seattle piano solo. For example, 0:32 on the Seattle solo sounds like 0:58 on the below piano track, and 1:08 on the Seattle solo sounds like 3:16 on the piano track.  

     

    it might have a few notes , but the feel of the solo has nothing to do with "this i love" IMO

     

    the piano solo on seattle has a mysterious , dark feel 
    while "this i love" is more ... romantic i guess 

     

    great piano solo anyway 

  8. 3 minutes ago, Powerage5 said:

    First off, the strumming rhythm is not the same at all. You're Crazy is straight sixteenth notes, with some heavily-placed accents. The Seeker has a dotted eighth, plus a couple thirty-seconds thrown in, and is played straight without the accents. 

     

    As for Dead Flowers/UTLH - it's another incredibly common chord progression (D-A-G-A), with the standard folk/Americana strumming pattern. I doubt you could trace that combination of chord progression and strumming pattern back to it's origin, but it was certainly long before the Stones used it.

    well i don't see (ear) music as some kind of science, to me the beggining of the seeker is identical to you're crazy , i'm not talking about the speed or amount of notes or anything like that.

    It has the same FEEL , that's why you can sing you're crazy on top of the seeker 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...