ChrisW

The purpose of the website is obvious, he's putting information together about what’s going on in Guns N’ Roses’ lives and how it's just as exciting and just as dangerous and just as heavy and just as real as people thought the hype scene to be. One look at the website makes that clear.

There's been a lot of people who want to give orders and physically attack anyone who doesn't obey, even if that assault interferes with more important tasks like giving a concert or airport security. Being in charge is what matters so if you need to beat your girlfriend, that's what's gonna happen. If your fans all die of old age waiting for your next album, sucks to be them. Most people don't get away with this as long as Axl has, but that powerlust is a lwell-known aspect of human nature.

Another G'n'R fan who only has a life of privilege. People in the lower classes have to hear this sort of thing every day, but you wouldn't know that.

We'll need a complete list of everything you've ever heard in your life if you want us to believe that. You must have a very simple and easy life with no need or want, to so quickly measure everything you've ever heard. Many people have heard more ridiculous things just this week, or month, or year, yet there you are, floating above us all. I wish I could live a life where the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard since the day I was born was that someone on the internet says A.I. is creativity. Are you at least happy about that?

You can use AI to create that. People can already use it to put out new Guns'n'Roses songs, because that's how creativity works. Meanwhile Axl is still re-recording that song about a pussy full of maggots who pissed him off in 1992. Someday it will be ready for the world to hear.

That's how human nature works. Or you'd be fighting to release it. Or you'd be pointing out to your cult your fans why you've magically failed every attempt to release it for the last 30 years. If someone points out this brand new invention called the internet, you'd start looking into how that works. If you hate the internet and only want the music on CD, you'd be fighting to restore the CD industry. You'd be putting these songs into your concerts so people can hear them. All this would build interest from the few people who are still alive to remember when you were popular. Did Elvis's daughter, Mrs. Mickael Jackson get to hear all the wonder new songs Axl had created in the last few decades? Who knows, she's dead. She was born rich and famous so they get privileges us peons aren't allowed, and that's who Axl works for. The cooks in his mansion don't get to create food and hold onto it for decades until anyone else gets to eat it.

"Music isn't something you create and not want everyone to hear it." Youtube is an option, rumble is an option, facebook is an option, and that's just three possibilities I came up with off the top of my head. There are other options as well if Axl actually has something people whose pussy is filled with maggots want to hear. And maybe other people want to hear it too. People who create music want people to hear it.

Did you skip the first sentence of my post or just ignoring it because then you couldn't miss the point?

Music isn't something you create and not want everyone to hear it. High school bands can come up with a song in a few hours, film themselves on their cellphone and post it on youtube. That's how we know Axl hasn't created anything for a long time.

Skimming posts makes it easy to ignore anything you don't like. You don't even point to what I "want to believe and not supported by much facts." Slash absolutely was trying to do something. He turned in a bunch of songs for the band to work on. The guy who can form a new band named "Guns'n'Roses" refused to work on them. Gilby and Matt worked on them and Duff was unavailable. Slash also worked with other people in the mid-90s. Then Slash was told to stop touring and go back to work on Axl's record. Axl doesn't show up so there's no reason for Slash to show up either. The abuser needs the victim more than the victim needs the abuser.

Slash isn't a good speaker, he's trying to get along with others and the best way to dominate your subordinates is to keep changing things so they have no idea what is happening next. Which Axl has a lot of experience at. Slash's goal was to write and record a new album and everybody but Axl was fine with that. Slash brings in a bunch of new tracks, Axl says "no." He's in charge and everybody else has to obey him. But if the goal of being in charge of others, they can't leave. No point having a dog leash if you don't have a dog on it. Because Axl is surrounded by people who tell him every day he uses time differently, he can delay Slash and try to tease him, that *maybe* he can do something with some parts of Slash's demos. Meanwhile Slash already has the Snakepit album recorded and ready to release. It's not classic G'n'R like "My World" and "Look At Your Game, Girl" but G'n'R owns it. I can't find the quote or who actually said it, but at some point it was specified that yes, except for this one Snakepit album, whoever owns G'n'R owns every music Slash makes until he leaves the band. We know who owns G'n'R. A sensible person who has a Brian May solo would want other people to hear it as soon as possible, and keep the solo just the way Brian May did it. Axl did neither because being in charge is more important, wasting Brian's time on a solo nobody will ever get to hear. That's how every employee is treated and that's why there isn't any new G'n'R music. Employees get paid whether they write new music for G'n'R or not. A sensible person would realize that nobody wants to play with Paul Tobias so don't force him on everyone else. But Axl's in charge, he owns the band and can hire anyone he wants. So Paul stays, everybody else has to leave, and they do. Other than the sycophants who surround Axl, who's going to claim that his new music in the 1990s is totally different from his new music in the 2000s which is totally different from his new music in the 2010s which is totally different from his new music in the 2020s? No stagnation there and anyone who disagrees has a pussy full of maggots. Slash wasn't sabotaging, he was just trying to get something done and move on. The last 30 years show that Axl is not remotely capable of that and he doesn't have to because he's in charge. Slash and Duff get paid more but they're still the sub, Axl is the dom.

'I don't have to do what you want and you need my permission to do what you want.' That's not how partnership works.

I think that we'll go on to write some very interesting things with Richard and he's already done some rhythm work and some leads on the album, [...] but it's time to stop [adding new songs] now and wrap up the baby.." (Axl, GNROnline, 08/15/02) "It feels right, the timing, and a lot of things. We've sorted it down to what songs are on the record. What the sequence of the songs is. The album cover art is ready. Blah, blah, blah. If you're waiting...don't. [...] Now that we feel that we have clarity as to the album we're trying to make, we're wrapping it up.'" (Axl, GNROnline, 08/15/02) This is a collaborative effort with the players, but the players aren't exactly sure what it should be to try to win over the world Guns N' Roses style. So that's kind of my responsibility. It took a long time, but now it's working, and I think we'll have the right record, and when we do drop the record, the plan is to drop the record, have a bunch of extra tracks, about a year or so down the road drop another record and drop a third record. This is a three-stage thing and we'll be touring for a real long time." (Axl, WRIF, 11/21/02) W. Axl Rose is concerned that not only will their audience be misled into believing that the planned compilation is an authorized release, but that it will hinder the release of the band's long awaited new studio album Chinese Democracy." (Sanctuary Group, press release, 03/15/04) "Rather than dwelling on the negative, Guns will be moving forward and surprisingly (without giving away any details) this unfortunate set of circumstances may have given us the opportunity to take our recording that one extra step further. [...] We greatly appreciate Bucket's contributions and remain open to "discussions" as there are obviously several issues to resolve." (Axl, press release, 03/30/04)

At this point, I totally believe what they've said, that before some concert, Axl refused to go on stage unless Slash and Duff signed paperwork giving him complete ownership. Doesn't matter if they could sue, they'd have to want to sue to make a difference, and they were just willing to walk away. "He (Slash) has been 'OFFICIALLY and LEGALLY' outside of the Guns N' Roses Partnership since December 31, 1995." (Axl, 10/30/96) If Slash and Duff have their co-ownership status back, they can release a new Guns'n'Roses song any time they want. If Axl's the only one who can approve that, he's in charge and they're just employees.

"This will serve as notice [that] effective [...] Decemeber 30th 1995, I will withdraw from the partnership. [...] I intend to use the name 'Guns N' Roses' in connection with a new group which I will form." (Slash & Duff v. Axl lawsuit document, 2004)