wasted Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 They did it with this last one. It's up there with the best albums of all time. It's unbelieveable. It really is their best album. It blows away their debut and Morning Glory. It's impossible. It's so unexpected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careful_With_That_Axe Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 brilliant album, seeing them live in 7 days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeanGenie Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 (edited) I think it's very good but nowhere near their best. Edited June 26, 2005 by JeanGenie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunners_4_eva Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 It is a fucking good album. it grows on you so much.i like pretty much every song on it.i dont recon its better than their first 2 but probably their third best for sure.i actually recon its their most solid, but the first two have a few of my favourite songs on them, so a bit biased i guess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest katie Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 I lvoe it and i ADORE the importance of being idle and part of the que. Fookin amazin! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumiere Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 They did it with this last one. It's up there with the best albums of all time. It's unbelieveable. It really is their best album. It blows away their debut and Morning Glory. It's impossible. It's so unexpected.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careful_With_That_Axe Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 LylaLove Like a BombThe Importance of being IdleThe Meaning of SoulGuess god thinks Im Abel= one of the best album sequences of all time.how does everyone rank oasis album?1.Definitely Maybe2.Standing on the soulder of Giants3.Dont Believe The Truth4.Whats the story morning glory5.Be Here Now6.Heathen Chemistry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gigger Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 1. Definitely Maybe2. Morning Glory3. Don't Believe The Truth4. Be Here Now5. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants6. Heathen ChemistryI'd have The Masterplan in at 3 if we were counting that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hampi Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 They did it with this last one. It's up there with the best albums of all time. It's unbelieveable. It really is their best album. It blows away their debut and Morning Glory. It's impossible. It's so unexpected.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> <{POST_SNAPBACK}>My thoughts exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rylz Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 They did it with this last one. It's up there with the best albums of all time. It's unbelieveable. It really is their best album. It blows away their debut and Morning Glory. It's impossible. It's so unexpectedcome on!! i have this album too, and its ok, but nothing special, and clearly not close to the best album of all time, you must be on crack! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunners_4_eva Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 1. WTS(MG) *****- By a hair (take out swamp songs, pretty much flawless)2. Definately Maybe ***** ( a few of them are a bit repetitive, thats the only problem, but some fucking AMAZING songs on this)3. Dont Believe the Truth **** (very melodic, instrumentals are good as well, catchy tunes)4. Be here now ****( why is this bagged out so much, great album i recon, just cause a few songs are like 7 minutes is its downfall)5. Masterplan ****(ok, maybe this is number 4,lol, this was excellent, liked most of the songs)6. Heathen Chemistry ***1/2 ( got half a dozen good tracks, a couple amoung their best, others sound like B's)7. Standing on the shoulder of giants *** ( only like about 4 on this album, of those, GLIO is the only really redeeming song. still an ok album, just like their others much more)damn it hard to give the albums star ratings.oh, an familiar to millions is great, but not really an "album" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted June 27, 2005 Author Share Posted June 27, 2005 I am on crack but that is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. lol.1. Don't Believe The Truth - by a country mile.2. What's The Story - The more I think about it the more these other two don't come close.3. Definitely Maybe - not even sure i liked this anyway.Joint 4th the others patchy, self-parodies or merely imitating Lennon.Songbird is classic though.Only thing I don't like about DBTT is that there aren't more songs. I hope they continue in this Glam-Revolver style. Keep the producers as well. The balance is perfect. Have you listened to this album on headphones - mindblowing!!!!It might be better than Appetite for Destruction!!!"I carry a madnesssEverywhere I goOver the borderAnd back to the snowSo if you see me And I look right throughYou shouldn't Take itAs a reflection on youC'mon Turn Up The SunTurn It Up For Everyone"Rock N Roll!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeanGenie Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 (edited) ok ok it's good but better than AFD? dude you scare me. Edited June 27, 2005 by JeanGenie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted June 27, 2005 Author Share Posted June 27, 2005 Maybe that's what Axl needs, some band to step up and hit the ball way out into space and say AFD's not that good. You've got competition now. Beat dis.This new Oasis one has the same consistency as Appetite just when you think you've heard the best song ever, another one starts.I think You're Crazy and Anything Goes aren't so hot on AFD. Oasis newie has no duff tracks and they have the benefit of modern technology which makes AFD sound less vibrant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeanGenie Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 now that's bullshit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyDeeds Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Maybe that's what Axl needs, some band to step up and hit the ball way out into space and say AFD's not that good. You've got competition now. Beat dis.This new Oasis one has the same consistency as Appetite just when you think you've heard the best song ever, another one starts.I think You're Crazy and Anything Goes aren't so hot on AFD. Oasis newie has no duff tracks and they have the benefit of modern technology which makes AFD sound less vibrant.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>A lot of the best production jobs were done in the 70s and 80s. It's not the technology. It's the fact that Gn'R at the time were nobodies and got a nobody producer. And Oasis have been around quite a while, so they have a decent one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunsNHalen Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 I'm not 100% sure that any rock albums that have come out so far this year will get a nomination for album of the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild_Child Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Thunderstruck (my brother) is going to see them on the 2nd of July. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careful_With_That_Axe Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Definitely Maybe is Better than AFD IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted June 28, 2005 Author Share Posted June 28, 2005 I suppose the production has to suit the record and songs and the times. I really like Danny Sabres production on The Stones Bridges to Babylon and he did Black Grapes' Stupid, Stupid, Stupid. I think, and I can see where you're comg from about there being good production in 70s/80s, of course there was, but Oasis have had choices for along time and made bad ones but with this producer it sounds 3-D and shimmers and rattles and rolls. Also, I think Guns got the producer they wanted right from the beginning, there nothing wrong with pro on AFD in my opinion. But at that time the modern recording techniques weren't open to them so Appetite does not have any effects. It does quite have the balls of the new Oasis. Like a girl moaning in the back ground was hi-tec in 87. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevGNR666 Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 now that's bullshit<{POST_SNAPBACK}>read my sig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted June 28, 2005 Author Share Posted June 28, 2005 Everything's bullshit, that's the beauty of life. You can relax cos it's all bullshit. After that turd of wisdom, I'm going for a lie down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeanGenie Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 we're talking here about music not about technology. Pharrel Williams is probably the best muscian on this planet when you talk about that cause he uses just the newset stuff around. Mariah Carey is making better records than AFD cause she has more modern producers with better effects. that all might be right but you forget one thing. it's about music and there's not much outside that can touch the musical beauty of Sweet child O' Mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted June 28, 2005 Author Share Posted June 28, 2005 er...hello, I didn't say tech is more important (but I could) but that AFD didn't have some of the techniques open to Oasis' new album, and in my opinion I think Oasis had some other options available which makes their record a little more ineresting at this moment in time. Back in 87, well let's not go there... And only in some ways. I wasn't really saying DBTT is better than AFD cos it uses newer technology, obviously. Just that it has advantages that AFD didn't have.But I think given the time difference of a decade, hold it two decades, it's not a completely off the wall claim that DBTT kicks harder in the production department than AFD. Do you believe what you said about the beauty of Sweet Child?It's a good rock song but really throwing down the "authenticity of real music" card is detrimental to my mental health, unless it's heartfelt. But if you believe that certain songs are beyond technology, I would say I have to agree with you. Hotel California couldn't be improved by a new production. Thriller doesn't need a remix. I would say as a music consumer, new recording sounds, you know some records have a freshness, and I appreciate this, especially in rock n roll record where most bands just use whatever everyone else is doing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careful_With_That_Axe Posted June 28, 2005 Share Posted June 28, 2005 slightly off topic.. but i find oasis very underrated as a "punk band" they have some great punk songs.Fade AwayBring it on downHeadshrinker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.