- Popular Post
-
Posts
323 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Events
Posts posted by FRANSAD
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Here is a preview of my upcoming MKV it will weigh around 10 GB took around 40 plus hours to render
- 15
- 3
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
So here are some screenshots i promised i blackened out any sensitive info to be down with the rules
First pic is a claim for Get in the ring song which i used for the intro of DTJ and after that couple of hours later second pic where they striked me for that video
3rd pic other Saskatoon Video being monetized 4th pic removal of sound city demo without any strike or whatsoever
5th pic monetizing claim for PARIS NEW SOURCE DISCOVERED MANUALLY 6TH Pic monetizing claim got this last week for had this video for over a year also DISCOVERED MANUALLY
Estimated earnings so you can see what could make certain channels interesting for bands or record companies
From what i've understand the strikes should be lifted any moment now if not i will take my own action tommorow
- 7
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, AFDRR said:Bootlegs as in never released material - no matter if some demo that found its way out of some basement, audience recorded footage or pro like the Saskatoon gig. All of it (whatever is live) is considered as bootlegs. Yes of course the music played or recorded is owned by someone (not necessarily the band) but most bands really don't care about it as long as it's not planned to be released. Some make money out of it in releasing the gigs themselves (which is a good thing) but at the end only hardcore fans care about it anyway. Don't get me wrong I didn't want to say you make money out of it, I just never saw an audience recording being claimed by a band or record company on YT but I guess your channel is big enough so they are happy you make them a bit of money with your videos (which obviously is fine).
Btw is the DTJ video private too I can't find it?
I absolutely never made a single dime on my videos and you never seen me asking for subscribers, patreon or anything else. The DTJ video was a bait video to get the strike from him and he did bite so it got pulled exactly as i wanted
- 5
- 1
- 1
-
49 minutes ago, AFDRR said:
Did you make an actual deal with them or is this just what you think? YT works simple. You upload something, if it gets detected by the bots (or the owner) they are able to monitize the video (and not the uploader). If the owner doesnt want it on YT he takes it down (even after months of making money out of it). Also lots of your videos are bootlegs so i'm not sure why all your videos are monitized (its the frans n roses channel, right?)
Lot of my videos where claimed manually, bootlegs as in fan filmed? True but the music in this footage is still owned by GN'R / universal. I also learned they renewed the contract because there was enough to be earned of the old songs on YT and other places
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, FRANSAD said:Hey guys just quick reaction from me cause I'm @work. This fella never took my Saskatoon video's down i put them on private so yesterday I made an Saskatoon DTJ video where I exposed his name because i wanted him to strike me. On all my videos i have monetizing from universal / geffen etc. In exchange they let me post their videos. Now I don't wanna brag about it but this is quite some cash I'm gegenerating for them. Even this exposure video I did was allready claimed by them...... To be continued in my next lunch break
So this morning gibbo showed me a screenshot of him personally addressing the dude who's responsible for al this and he said it was universal who did and that's where he is wrong because on my video I already had a claim from universal about them monetizing it, in fact i had these claims from universal on all my Saskatoon video's. And some of u might know i was working on my own Paris tape conversion and I posted multiple samples of it and universal is monetizing these as well. So it doesn't make sense saying they don't want it out. Also just before the AFD box announcement they pulled al sound city demos i had in different clips never received any strike for it. A lot of my clips stuff was claimed manually by Universal which says enough. I will proof all I'm saying with screenshots when I'm home. I will show all this to the guy responsible for the strikes and i don't wanna ruin anyone's live or whatever so ill give him the option to remove those claims on Saskatoon or i will adress this to Universal so we will see who is the right content owner it's his choice.
- 9
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Hey guys just quick reaction from me cause I'm @work. This fella never took my Saskatoon video's down i put them on private so yesterday I made an Saskatoon DTJ video where I exposed his name because i wanted him to strike me. On all my videos i have monetizing from universal / geffen etc. In exchange they let me post their videos. Now I don't wanna brag about it but this is quite some cash I'm gegenerating for them. Even this exposure video I did was allready claimed by them...... To be continued in my next lunch break
- 6
-
46 minutes ago, WillBailey said:
Got 2 strikes because of this... Im gonna ask my wife who's Russian-speaking some good uploading/ streaming sites in Russia/ ex-USSR. Lets see how they remove it from there.
Get in the ring motherf@!*ers
I know who he is PM me if u want to know. Can't you challenge these strikes? So he must proof things?
- 1
-
I already posted something but it's gone i have quite a few Saskatoon clips on my channel and some of them have a copyright notice saying I can't monetize these vids (which I never do) but they will monetize them and I can leave them up without a strike. I have this on almost all my videos
- 1
-
18 hours ago, rockphantom said:
I am anticipating that a Saskatoon MKV including PCM audio from the CDs will be produced once the DVD and FLAC files are in the wild?
I'd rather have that than the expensive box set!!
I Will do a properly deinterlaced mkv with pcm audio (if available) for sure
- 2
-
11 hours ago, Chris 55 said:
So, there's this version where the Frans N' Roses channel steals the video, removes the watermark and then adds the giant "Get Your Dick Out Axl" watermark. Kinda lame.
11 hours ago, Kelmi said:Yeah it is very lame. No need for the watermark. Frans did not free this bootleg.
Dude at least i admit in the description box i ripped the video from that guy unlike the people who rip my videos and post them on Facebook or whatever and cut of the watermark and without proper crediting. Did u ever remaster any video with good results and synched it properly with decent audio? Well if you do than u should know how much time it takes to get nice results. And the sign says: AXL GET YOUR VIDEOS OUT and thats just a statement to GnFnR to release some fuckin' proshots asap. And now with this epic Saskatoon video u might see the importance of that.
- 2
- 1
-
-
30 minutes ago, ludurigan said:
wow this is truly a great collection of stuff, hope you find someone to digitalize these videos real soon!
@FRANSAD can you do it?
Limulus is the guy who needs to do these transfers just emailed him. This is some serious stuff man!!! Expect a PM soon
- 3
- 1
-
Maybe we should buy it with multiple people to lower the costs and make sure it gets shared with the fans before it sells out and disappears from the radar
- 3
-
-
11 minutes ago, ludurigan said:
hope they do one of those boxes with 16 discs on it!
Yeah and like there are 5 golden keys hidden in the the 3 million factory pressed boxes and whomever finds a key gets to spend a week in the vault
- 1
-
In the last few days, I had several copyright claims on my videos and I do have them on almost all videos stating i can have them uploaded but Geffen or whatever company will monetize them which is fine by me.
But these were different because they are suddenly blocked on youtube meaning they got removed from my channel
- Ain't Goin' Down No More (Instrumental Version \ 1986 Sound City - Guns N' Roses - claimed by UMG for Geffen - Blocked in all countries
- Move To The City (Acoustic Version / 1986 Sound City Session) - Guns N' Roses - claimed by UMG for Geffen - Blocked in all countries
- Jumpin' Jack Flash (Acoustic Version / 1986 Sound City Session) - Guns N' Roses - claimed by UMG for Geffen - Blocked in all countries
- Move To The City (Acoustic Version / 1986 Sound City Session) - Guns N' Roses - claimed by UMG for Geffen - Blocked in all countries
These have been sitting there for a while and suddenly they got blocked same goes for the mystic studio tape it had to be removed too.
So maybe GnFnR is looking to release those demo sessions
- 3
- 1
-
Thanks for the feedback on my channel and i'm glad u like my videos and also thanks once more for sharing that great tape highly appreciated even in lq mp3 it rocks AF
- 1
-
On 28-2-2018 at 6:10 PM, troccoli said:
How do you figure it's fair game? I posted it on Soundcloud for a reason, read the 3rd post above. Don't get me wrong, on a personal level I don't care and have nothing against you or Frans. And I have no idea if GNR will care. But if they do, they might not care as long as it's not downloadable. Of course there are ways of getting around it, but just because you can doesn't mean that you should. On the flip side if they do care and make it all get taken down, or even if someone just finds a runaround like Frans did and is able to download (in original quality) well then you can understand if no one does anything like this in the future when they come across gems like this. For example I was privy to listen to unreleased GNR tracks in someone's hotel room during the last residency. We also got to see pro shot footage from Puerto Rico (2009 or 2010) and pro shot footage of a soundcheck by the band with either Tommy or Bumble singing mot of the songs. It was all with the understanding that no was recording it to be released later. Hopefully you see what I am saying here.
Also when tweaked are you "improving" it really? The raw sound is about the experience of it. You can argue that cds improved the sound of vinyl (I don't mean the technical side of things, but I ma talking about the hiss, etc., those cool weird little sounds that happen when you play vinyl), but again it makes the experience different (keep in mind this comment is coming from someone that was raised on cds, I have never even owned a record player). Live Era is another example where the audio was tweaked, and many have a problem with it. Personally I don't but I can see their side. There was a reason I had a professional transfer this at the highest quality possible. We could have tweaked it as well but that betrays the rawness of it IMO.Seems i totally missed this discussion, yes i've put them on Youtube mainly because there's a much bigger audience that can hear this great release and there's more people to reach out to than on soundcloud and the more people are reached the less will buy that stuff offa ebay when some bootleg company will press it to silver or vinyl. I was only able to rip it from SC in mp3 128kbps ,i also told this to your friend who did the original transfer. I still really wonder if u could rip it as true FLAC, ofcourse i gave you and your 2 friends credits for it in the YT video and i'm not monetizing any of my video's on my channel. I agree that it's best to keep the original files in their original shape specially when sharing and if u remaster or retrack, do it for private use only. Since this wasnt really shared and only rippable in LQ (for most people) i did tweak it but mainly volume settings because when upped to my channel YT will rape the bitrate and volume once more. Besides there wasnt much to tweak anyways because even in 128 mp3 they sound killer and so i guess the FLACS still stay rare and not heavily circulating
- 2
-
Get your videos out Axl
- 1
-
Both Stockholm 91 all day every day and both mountain view 91 shows to vary
- 1
-
What is a "djashba" ?
- 1
-
06.22.91 - Hampton Coliseum, Hampton, VA
07.19.91 - Shoreline Amphitheatre, Mountain View, CA
- 2
-
Who is Noel Gallagher?
- 1
-
On 27-11-2017 at 7:57 AM, ksks12 said:
Can someone upload it to YouTube? TIA
Chances are high you will get a content claim for putting it on YT. I've put a download link in the download section
- 1
Guns N' Roses-Saskatoon,Canada 03/26/1993 *NEW THREAD*
in GUNS N' ROSES - DISCUSSION & NEWS
Posted · Edited by FRANSAD
it's 60 Frames a second so it sizes up really quickly will do a regular version later. FAT32 Limits seriously? never heard a player could have that and these days 10 GB is nothing. Hard drives getting bigger 0,30 euro cents per GB would be the average price. 4kK Bluray average size is 60GB. Besides when it comes to classic GNR it's quality that u want no matter what size at least thats how i think