Jump to content

FRANSAD

Members
  • Posts

    323
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by FRANSAD

  1. Ooh yeah, let's start another feud because the gnr community lacks decent beef. The people on this forum are certainly not their target audience, but think about new fans who want to learn about the band's history. Hell what about our own kids, if you don't teach your kids that once there was this rock n' roll band Rollin' on the streets, you fail in parenthood. Gnr Central has hours of good quality footage especially for newcomers but the content getting thinner is inevitable. Try to run a channel like that for 3 years staying so consistent and besides that GnR Central is the only channel that successfully disputed the many copyright claims they received from them tards in their many attempts to take em down. In fact, it might be the only non-official gnr footage left on YT soon and if you don't like it don't fuckin' watch it, it's that simple. Don't underestimate the importance of Sidds channel in telling future generations about Classic guns.
    Fun to see that the people that complain the most are also the best informed about the most recent content and "clickbait" titles!!

    • Like 1
  2. 18 hours ago, Gibsonfender2323 said:

    Recording Industry Of America

    @Gambit83 can you provide updates

    The RIAA was used many times already, the IFPI is like the European RIAA and its just a matter of to whom or to what anti-piracy website you go to report links.
    So anyone noticed how a lot of videos from the Palladium gig where reported and got removed right after the show. 
    This time it's pretty obvious and I can totally see the reason for the band wanting this performance to be erased forever!!

  3. This file stinks for multiple reasons, first of all, its in wmv and one must be really a tard to use that as a codec for capturing since its lossy AF. Second it's shows signs of combing in the moving parts and i tried to inverse telecine it of to no avail. So either it was captured by a retard or it was converted and ruined on purpose so the original file still has some trading value. I'm quite sure it was destroyed with a reason and the fact that it has major combing, the picture was shifted, the audio is heavily compressed and the format this file has proves that.

    • Like 2
  4. That's def. not the manager and just another troll account like the many they are known for creating. One of the usual suspects claims to regret signing a contract with the UMG takedown squad and tries to "sorry" his way into the community again.
    Prolly because he's scared shitless to attend some of the upcoming shows. Also trying to blame UMG to make look TB innocent, which is bullshit because UMG is known for monetizing the fuck out of everything. Besides that, just ahead of the announcement an AFD box was in the works, UMG went manually through my channel and removed all stuff related to the Sound City demo's including the It's So Easy video clip. (which also came out remastered along with the box) But no strikes or warnings where given prolly because they liked to keep monetizing my channel. Then suddenly a few days later the IFPI, who actually works for companies like UMG, and UZIsuicidal (registered to one of the offenders) starts striking different kinds of videos. So I bet my balls TB started all this bullshit and I still don't understand why, they could have just sent us an email or make a statement that they wanted all video's of the tube, fine by me, in the end, it's their content. But no someone decided its better to first monetize those channels for years and then suddenly terminate them all without notice. Like I said they could have just emailed us and skip getting all this drama, I guess it's just a case of bad management there's no other way I can call this.

    • Thanks 1
    • GNFNR 2
  5. Agreed, the switch has a great catalog of games already and also some pretty nice complete versions of little older classic, they also got rid of the kiddy image nintendo consoles use to have. I really hoped a new mario kart would be announced it is about time for a new part in that series. Any news about mario kart android btw?

  6. Geez, it looks like almost every console that existed will have his mini version. Can't believe it will sell bigtime, don't get me wrong i like my retro games but the older they are the shittier they look. I love to keep my good memories of certain classics because everytime i fire up a really old game it really destroys the memories i had of it, cos it looks so crappy.

  7. On 29-5-2019 at 5:46 AM, Jim Powers said:

    Any brand new news on Guns N Roses takedowns?  I guess they have blocked or taken down most of the concert video from 2016 ans 2017 at this point. My channel is still down youtube never even gave me a response on my counternotification. I guess no news means we dont accept your counternotification and your channel stays down. Dicks!!

    What about calling them, didn't you buy a bundle to call them overseas, also saying the rather pick up the phone than responding to emails/
    I think @sidman69 won a dispute with the IFPI last week and it took at least a month for YT to decide that!!!

  8. Yeah basically without integrated graphics u cant do stuff with it until you have a new card. If you are limited by budget i would maybe consider buying a 2nd hand gpu,

    people upgrade that a lot so sometimes you can find some very cheap 2nfd hand gpu's for a very low price

  9. Integrated graphics in the CPU is not necessary, but it could be handy for troubleshooting because you can still access the pc and also still use it to browse etc if the gpu would die. 

    - The Ryzen 5 2600 is currently the undisputed choice in bang for buck. For the price of less than 160 euros you get a hexacore processor with cores that clock on a turbocharger of 3.9 GHz.

       With its six, the cores ensure that you can effortlessly get through the busy scenes of demanding games on full HD. In terms of value for money there is no better choice now.

    - The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 OC 6G is considerably more powerful, namely 25 percent faster than the RX 580 and it also uses 30 percent less energy. The dual Windforce fans of this video card

      are a proven recipe and deliver solid cooling performance without too much noise. With a low load, they even stop completely.

     

    Not sure about the paste,  if your gonna build it yourself i would always order cooling paste, and if it would come with the processor it wont be pre attached, normally it's only a few bucks, but if you will have it assembled at the shop

    don't buy it because they will apply it in order to test run the system before they deliver so you dont need it.

    Another thing it to remind that a GPU unit can be replaced in almost every MOBO but be aware that if you wanna replace the cpu, chances are the latest processors will need a new socket and thus motherboard, so

    it would invest more in the cpu 

    • Thanks 1
  10. I would recommend this build, u should be able to get this for less than 700 but it also counts a pc case which i think is missing from your specs. With this system, u can play all nu gen triple a games on full hd without problems.

     

    AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Wraith Boxed

    ASRock B450M Pro4

    internG.Skill Aegis F4-3000C16D-16GISB

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 OC 6G

    Fractal Design Focus G Mini€ 

    be quiet! Pure Power 11 400W

    Crucial MX500 2,5" 500GB

    U can also use a nintendo switch pro controller with windows or playstation controllers, works like a charm. Check this freeware to setup ps4 controllers for pc
    http://ds4windows.com/

    Be sure to check out this game about building your own rig, its getting very nices scores on metacritic and is actually pretty good for pre build fun
    https://store.steampowered.com/app/621060/PC_Building_Simulator/

     

  11. 19 minutes ago, UsedYourIllusion said:

    So in terms of the actual video, from all the TV reports i've seen posted and have been able to find on YouTube, it seems like this comes from the tape given to the studio to use for the report. You obviously see the intro to jungle before the first verse, and the bridge before the solo. But there were parts of the TV report fading in and out. For what it's worth, it seems like this is a part of the unedited video. HOPEFULLY, that means a release similar to Saskatoon, unless i'm mistaken. The only other proshot clip i've seen was the very beginning part of Jungle, right as Axl says "Oh My God". 

    The exact same frames from the clip where already available from the news report for years and the biggest difference is that they all had the logo and subtitles, but the clip Wanker already reported didn't. It looked like the picture of that video was kind of zoomed in to lose the subs and logo.  The reason you can tell its Wanker doing the claims is the selectiveness of the video getting flagged. There's still loads of gnfnr vids on YT and if this was a professional company trying to claim gnfrs rights for them they would have definitely removed every single vid on YT!!

  12. 20 hours ago, Jim Powers said:

    Not going to give the exact email address for the time being but it was in the realm of weber1972@gmail.com (again, not exact email address some letters missing at the front) and it said the company was IFPILondon.  I emailed the address and it has an automated response saying they dont have time to respond to every inquiry and has the IFPI email address at the bottom for the website (which the company website is IFPI but this dude is claiming the company is IFPILondon in the takedown notice associated with his generic weber1972 gmail account. Well there is no IFPILondon company there is just a plain IFPI. I called IFPI and they said all their copyright notice takedowns come from IFPInotices@IFPI.org  This one came from a gmail account that is under someone's name. Youtube should not have taken the videos down to begin but from googling this isn't the 1st time Guns n Roses videos have been targeted it started last August and its not the 1st time someone maliciously submitted takedown notices to a youtube account in general. The bad thing it took 4 days for youtube to forward my contact info to this email address and now I have to wait another 10-14 days for them to respond with a formal legal dispute until the strikes are dropped and my account is restored. I went from 0 to 3 strikes in one takedown notice from this gmail account. So dumb.

    So it seems this guy just wrote an official looking email to YT claiming he represents IFPI and thus making false accusations which are punishable, so therefore you should also contact YT and tell them this guy is abusing the system. Normally these strikes are going through the IFPI as in content holders who are officially verified always have an account with the IFPI and through that account, they can strike whomever they like even if its not their content YT and IFPI will hand out automated claims and strikes without checking the content. But according to your story it has to be a person who's acting without an account and has YT thinking its coming from an officially licensed to strike based account. So please notify both YT and IFPI about this matter.
    Another thing you can do is search for the claims made against you on this website, it features al content claims ever made, and since this is not official IFPI you might be able to see who exactly is claiming this and why. Most of the times this info is blocked when it was done by a real account but in this case it might show who's responsible

    https://lumendatabase.org/

    Please let me know your findings

     

    • Like 2
  13. On 24-3-2019 at 8:57 AM, Jim Powers said:

    As a follow up I called IFPI on Friday and they said all their notices come from ifpinotices@ifpi.org  You can google the company name and there is a phone number in Great Britain for that company. I added the unlimited minutes plan to my mobile plan for calling to Great Britain at $15 a month (will drop after a month).  Believe it or not they answer the phone (email they generally dont respond). I'm curious what email was attached to your takedown notice, there had to be an email in the takedown notice, if its IFPI legit then it would have to be ifpinotices@ifpi.org any other email and its someone playing games. Mine was a gmail address and the lady said they dont use gmail accounts for takedowns. I submitted a counter notification to youtube for my videos to be reinstated. It takes 10-14 days to review. I'll followup once I get a reply.

    So basically your saying you got a strike from the IFPI but it came from a different email adres? If so then IFPI should be researching because it look as if someone can hand out strikes from their name, meaning their system is broke because you did receive the strikes. The whole IFPI is a terrible organisation because all is automated, people with accounts can send in any video the like. They are not verified by IFPI nor anyone else its all automated and when yt receives a copyright its not verified either but immediatly accepted until you prove they are wrong.
    Always dispute the claims from IFPI as they never respond and you'll win every case simply because they dont have the manpower to verify every claim. After about 5 succesfull disputes you can take action and make your channel immune to the IFPI!!!!!.

    Can you tell me the exact email adres that was used to strike you?

  14. On 20-3-2019 at 4:01 PM, Jim Powers said:

    Anyone else getting hit by IFPILondon for copyright takedowns of youtube Concert Videos from the Fall US 2017 Guns N Roses tour. My entire youtube channel went down last week due to copyright takedown notices for those shows (all 3 strikes) a total of 52 videos.  Not sure if it was legitimate or not. Came from a "generic name 1972" gmail email address with IFPILondon below it on the takedown notices. Usually that kind of thing would come from IFPInotices@ifpi.org   Also, has anyone submitted a counter notice to get their videos back up on youtube from this type of takedown?  Any luck on getting the videos back up?  I'm looking to get my channel back up on youtube but not looking to get sued. I'm thinking based on the email being a generic email with 1972 at gmail pretty good chance this is a fake takedown notice. I've emailed that email for a retraction and no response with a generic automatic response from a supposed IFPI that we review emails Thank you for contacting IFPI. If you are receiving this message your email has been received and will be carefully reviewed by our notices team. This inbox is monitored on a frequent basis but due to the volume of emails received we cannot respond to every enquiry.

    As i said before UMG removed a lot of those demo's included in the box right before the box was announced, so they went manually through my channel blocking all content that was about to be released but UMG never striked me as you can see on this screenshot.

    Please also note the Claimed by: UMG part
    claim110.png 

    In this next screenshot u can see UMG claiming a video but this time they choose to let is stay on my channel but they will monetize it, which is fine by me because i even didnt have the monetizing option turned on and nearly all my video's where monetized by UMG anyways

    Please also note the Claimed by: UMG part

    claim310.png

    Then suddenly the IFPI comes and claims the same video and gives me a strike for it, which i find very strange because the IFPI works for companies as UMG making sure any YT money goes to the right copyright owner which in this case is UMG.

    So here comes the IFPI overruling a decision made by the real content holder UMG and by doing this they make the company they work for LOOSE money.

    Please note the Takedown issued by IFPI part

    claim410.png  


    So when that happened it raised some questions and I contacted the IFPI about it and at first, they didn't react at all but after multiple emails asking them how they could overrule a decision made by the one and only copyright holder they gave me some automated bullshit reply, not even responding to my original question. Ofcourse i replied with screenshots proving the overuling story but they never responded again. 

    claim510.png

    So the whole point in this is I understand UMG doesn't want stuff to be sold on Youtube and even if they don't plan on selling it but still want it gone from the tube im fine with that i don't owe any single copyright from Guns N' Roses material.

    But be clear about because if i knew in the end they want it all gone i wouldnt have invested the time and effort in my channel but by monetizing almost all my vids they seemed to like the money offa it.

    So it's about time  "someone to tell us what the fuck is going on Goddammit"

    • Like 3
  15. 7 hours ago, Gambit83 said:

    All fans now need to be careful sharing GNR YouTube videos on Twitter. Not because of the band or illegal behavior, but the internet troll uses it as a weapon to get other fans banned. If it's not an "official" GNR video, he will use the copyright loopholes to cast strikes against your account in hopes of getting you banned.

     

    As happened with my Youtube, Reddit, Mega and Twitter account. Funny thing about that is they don't seem to realize opening a new account is so fuckin' easy. Makin' their efforts totally useless. Makes you realize they must be really retarded considering the fact they do it themselves all the time on this and many other gnr related websites, desperately trying to see if their useless acts are being discussed.  

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...