mr. orangestone Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 http://pitchfork.com/news/36154-thom-yorke...ums-for-awhile/well that sucks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin' Jack Flash Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr. orangestone Posted August 10, 2009 Author Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.i'm positive that many, many people disagree with you. sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin' Jack Flash Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.i'm positive that many, many people disagree with you. sorry.Really? Better change my opinion, then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightningBolt Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon Comstock Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1+2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inthisriver Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Thom Yorke=GeniusThere's not many "frontmen" in the same league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetchupNotMayo Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Hey, this could be good news, it might mean we get new material more often, just not as much each time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inthisriver Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Hey, this could be good news, it might mean we get new material more often, just not as much each time.Harry Patch (In Memory Of) is a pretty sweet song. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest floyd the barber Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 They're almost as shitty as NIN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inthisriver Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 They're almost as shitty as NIN.Oh No You Didn't!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevelle Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 (edited) RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1+2-1Radiohead is leaps and bounds ahead of most mainstream bands from the past 20 years. Edited August 10, 2009 by chevelle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightningBolt Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1+2-1Radiohead is leaps and bounds ahead of most mainstream bands from the past 20 years.lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon Comstock Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 They're almost as shitty as NIN.Oh No You Didn't!!!he's not wrong.nin suck pretty hard too. imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inthisriver Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 They're almost as shitty as NIN.Oh No You Didn't!!!he's not wrong.nin suck pretty hard too. imo.True or False: The Motley Crue is one of your favorite bands? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr-brownstone Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1+2-1Radiohead is leaps and bounds ahead of most mainstream bands from the past 20 years.lolyou don't know what your talking about. If you don't like them that is one thing, but there is a reason why they are a highly respected group. Brad Mehldau covers their pieces often and he is perhaps the most highly regarded current vanguard jazz pianist.But...since this is a guns n roses forum it isn't surprising there are people who can't recognize that radiohead does something special in relation to the current (and old) "rock" bands. Like I said, if you don't like them that is understandable but to regard them as shit I don't think is warranted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightningBolt Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1+2-1Radiohead is leaps and bounds ahead of most mainstream bands from the past 20 years.lolyou don't know what your talking about. If you don't like them that is one thing, but there is a reason why they are a highly respected group. Brad Mehldau covers their pieces often and he is perhaps the most highly regarded current vanguard jazz pianist.But...since this is a guns n roses forum it isn't surprising there are people who can't recognize that radiohead does something special in relation to the current (and old) "rock" bands. Like I said, if you don't like them that is understandable but to regard them as shit I don't think is warranted.I never did that. But the "leaps and bounds" comment would've been just as wrong, in my opinion. I just don't get their appeal, never really did anything too offensive for your comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon Comstock Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 They're almost as shitty as NIN.Oh No You Didn't!!!he's not wrong.nin suck pretty hard too. imo.True or False: The Motley Crue is one of your favorite bands?true.look at what you qouted.... "imo." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr-brownstone Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1+2-1Radiohead is leaps and bounds ahead of most mainstream bands from the past 20 years.lolyou don't know what your talking about. If you don't like them that is one thing, but there is a reason why they are a highly respected group. Brad Mehldau covers their pieces often and he is perhaps the most highly regarded current vanguard jazz pianist.But...since this is a guns n roses forum it isn't surprising there are people who can't recognize that radiohead does something special in relation to the current (and old) "rock" bands. Like I said, if you don't like them that is understandable but to regard them as shit I don't think is warranted.I never did that. But the "leaps and bounds" comment would've been just as wrong, in my opinion. I just don't get their appeal, never really did anything too offensive for your comment. To be honest I was specifically referring to your comment, I was sloppy with who I was quoting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr. orangestone Posted August 10, 2009 Author Share Posted August 10, 2009 (edited) I love how people feel the need to shit all over Radiohead. You can stay out of the thread and go enjoy music that doesn't make you think at all, like Motley Crue & Poison. God forbid Radiohead do something unique & interesting...EDIT: and to the guy who told me to prove him wrong that people would disagree about Radiohead sucking- they have sold A LOT of albums, and I'm sure those people would disagree. On Last.fm GNR has like 1.3 million listeners, Radiohead has 2.2 million. Edited August 10, 2009 by mr. orangestone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt13 Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1+2-1Radiohead is leaps and bounds ahead of most mainstream bands from the past 20 years.You're right. Which illustrates how bad 'mainstream' music has been for the last 20 years. Doesn't 'mainstream' mean popular? Funny, I never hear Radiohead on any radiostation or on MTV... at all. Less 'Creep'. I agree with the second poster... Radiohead sucks. Big Monkey Balls at that. And it disgusts me when they're compared to Pink Floyd. That's just plain old ridiculous. Seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr. orangestone Posted August 10, 2009 Author Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1+2-1Radiohead is leaps and bounds ahead of most mainstream bands from the past 20 years.You're right. Which illustrates how bad 'mainstream' music has been for the last 20 years. Doesn't 'mainstream' mean popular? Funny, I never hear Radiohead on any radiostation or on MTV... at all. Less 'Creep'. I agree with the second poster... Radiohead sucks. Big Monkey Balls at that. And it disgusts me when they're compared to Pink Floyd. That's just plain old ridiculous. Seriously.They aren't mainstream? They were nominated for album of the year at the Grammys this year & they won best alternative rock album. They're a HUGE band right now.And they aren't similar to Pink Floyd, except in the fact that they're British, extremely unique, and extremely talented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuffle Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.Well that's a useful post, congratulations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marky Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 The Bends and Ok Computer remain to this today, 2 incredible albums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr-brownstone Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 RH sucks the big one. Sorry.+1+2-1Radiohead is leaps and bounds ahead of most mainstream bands from the past 20 years.You're right. Which illustrates how bad 'mainstream' music has been for the last 20 years. Doesn't 'mainstream' mean popular? Funny, I never hear Radiohead on any radiostation or on MTV... at all. Less 'Creep'. I agree with the second poster... Radiohead sucks. Big Monkey Balls at that. And it disgusts me when they're compared to Pink Floyd. That's just plain old ridiculous. Seriously.Out of curiosity have you actually listened to OK Computer, Amnesiac and In Rainbows? And not just the songs that get played on the radio, but the entire albums? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.