Jump to content

UNBELIEVABLE SHIT


nanker_phelge

Recommended Posts

this made me fucking shit a brick. seems like motley crue still have a little bit of a stick up their chubby asses 'cause they will never come within a light year of our boys.

they are entitled to their opinions, but, as far as i'm concerned, fuck nu motley crue. axl emo? haha don't think so there frankie ferranna.

Well, Motley Crue appear in the latest issue of Maxim and let’s just say they haven’t quite let go of their fued with GNR.

Vince:

A band is only as good as its last record, so you're really competing with yourself. People keep this rivalry with Guns N Roses going, but it's crazy. You don't hold a grudge for 15 years. It's stupid. Why look back?

Tommy:

When Guns was opening for us, Slash thought he could keep up with us drinking Jack. So we started ripping em back. Slash throws up. We got him back to one of our rooms, laid him down on the bed, put our nut sacs right on his chin and took a fucking Polaroid of it. I think we laminated it and made that his tour pass.

Nikki:

The thing with Axl is as much as I love him, he's kind of a fucking emo fag. He's not really a dude. He's like the Wizard of Oz behind a curtain making a lot of noise. He never stepped up to the plate when Vince challenged him. Axl wasn't into getting wild. I think that's his inner-emo. He's so fucking artsy. I'm pulling it out in the press. Axl if you're there: Lose your inner-emo. Come back to us. Dude, let's rock.

Source:Article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Fuck that. He's just havin' a laugh. Don't take it so personally, he never insulted you. He never insulted Axl either if you think about it. They were just 2 bands that used to rock out and hang together it's all gravvy B)

i like the way you put that kev. good man. i just have more loyalty to guns i guess. it's all good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's just me but I don't see this as an insult... it's just their way to say: "Get out of your cave Axl, release the CD and rock again!"

Sure, the choice of words may sound a little bit wrong... but well... basically they're right, Axl should come out and rock the world again.

I disagree on the "emo fag" part... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuck that. He's just havin' a laugh. Don't take it so personally, he never insulted you. He never insulted Axl either if you think about it. They were just 2 bands that used to rock out and hang together it's all gravvy B)

i like the way you put that kev. good man. i just have more loyalty to guns i guess. it's all good.

Cool find though nanker_phelge, i'll buy this months issue of Maxim now :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many times does it have to be said. Moetley Crue represented everything that was pathetic about hair metal. They were basically a manufactured glam-rock-pop band, and as soon as that pitiable scene dissolved, so did their popularity. They were a product of their era, epitomising insincerity. They did not define it. Their musical output was, at its very best, decisively average, and at its worst, downright appalling. The lyrics to their songs could have been written by a seven year old: -

Without you, there’s no change

My nights and days are grey

If I reached out and touched the rain

It just wouldn’t feel the same

Without you, I’d be lost

I’d slip down from the top

I’d slide down so low

Girl you’d never, never know...

How clichéd and immature do you get!

Their comeback was a complete failure, simply because they could not transcend their genre as GNR did. They are absolutely right about Axl being an emo - no doubt about it. But at the end of the day, Axl dares to step out and sing what is in his heart. He doesn't care about being judged. And isn't that what rock n' roll is all about. It's not about the sex n' drugs n' girls n' partying. When all those old bands were doing the sex drugs n' rock n' roll, it was considered to be cool because they were contravening social mores/conventions/expectations. Tatoos were for criminals and sailors; people weren't supposed to talk about sex; multiple sexual relationships got you condemned; one didn't swear publicly; drugs were bad and for scumbags. These things didn't define rock n' roll. What defined it was the fact that those boys were not adhering to what was expected: they were living as they wanted to with no regard for social conventions. They were breaking the rules and, as such, people frowned and condemned.

Nowadays, all those things are perfectly acceptable. Nobody honestly believes in sex before marriage; everybody talks about sex; drugs are not frowned upon - there are even campaigns to get them legalised; even tinee-bopper pop-stars have tattoos and indulge in god-knows-what sexual practices; nobody is offended by swearing anymore.

The thing about glam rockers is that they really believe that rock n' roll is defined by sex, drugs, tattoos, etc. They can't understand that those things only defined rock n' roll when they were considered "bad". Is there anything sadder than happily-married men like Gene Simmons or Vince Neil strutting around, saying that they still indulge in all those practices, that they have open sexual relationships, that they are still bad boys at 50!? Isn't it rather pathetic they still need to do that to sell records because their material is so bloody weak? Wouldn't it be more rock n' roll to use their relationships and new middle-aged lives to stimulate their material rather than living a lie?!

If rock n' roll is about honesty, which I believe it is, then the likes of Axl Rose, Robert Plant, Richie Blackmore and Slash have to score high. They behave as they want to behave. They don't do it to sell records or to play to any stereotype. Axl never tried to play to any stereotype. He behaved as he wanted to behave when he wanted to behave. He didn't care about swearing in records (before it was considered "the done thing" - I don't remember Motely Crue ever having the balls to do it), he didn't care about using offensive terms (black person and hooray for tolerance!), he didn't care about writing about sex and drugs one record and then lonliness, emptiness, love, hate, mental problems, etc, the next record. His honesty was the key to Guns' success and, indeed, to their ability to transcend their genre and their era.

If Motley Crue want to offend GNR and Axl, then that's fine. They are dead men walking anyway. Nobody wants to give them the time of day. They and their "act" is a walking freak-show - a throwback to a forgotten period of hair metal and glammed up dudes. They are an anachronism who, let's face it, have never even produced a half-decent song. Then they decide to make a comeback, not for artistic satisfation, but to make a quick buck by making a thrash-record, just because that's what happens to be hot at the moment.

Do you care when a tramp or a whore or a porn-star judges you? Of course not. And why? Because they are low-lifes: bottom-feeders who command no respect. It's the same with Motley Crue. I bet Axl laughed his arse off when/if he read those comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many times does it have to be said. Moetley Crue represented everything that was pathetic about hair metal. They were basically a manufactured glam-rock-pop band, and as soon as that pitiable scene dissolved, so did their popularity. They were a product of their era, epitomising insincerity. They did not define it. Their musical output was, at its very best, decisively average, and at its worst, downright appalling. The lyrics to their songs could have been written by a seven year old: -

Without you, there’s no change

My nights and days are grey

If I reached out and touched the rain

It just wouldn’t feel the same

Without you, I’d be lost

I’d slip down from the top

I’d slide down so low

Girl you’d never, never know...

How clichéd and immature do you get!

Their comeback was a complete failure, simply because they could not transcend their genre as GNR did. They are absolutely right about Axl being an emo - no doubt about it. But at the end of the day, Axl dares to step out and sing what is in his heart. He doesn't care about being judged. And isn't that what rock n' roll is all about. It's not about the sex n' drugs n' girls n' partying. When all those old bands were doing the sex drugs n' rock n' roll, it was considered to be cool because they were contravening social mores/conventions/expectations. Tatoos were for criminals and sailors; people weren't supposed to talk about sex; multiple sexual relationships got you condemned; one didn't swear publicly; drugs were bad and for scumbags. These things didn't define rock n' roll. What defined it was the fact that those boys were not adhering to what was expected: they were living as they wanted to with no regard for social conventions. They were breaking the rules and, as such, people frowned and condemned.

Nowadays, all those things are perfectly acceptable. Nobody honestly believes in sex before marriage; everybody talks about sex; drugs are not frowned upon - there are even campaigns to get them legalised; even tinee-bopper pop-stars have tattoos and indulge in god-knows-what sexual practices; nobody is offended by swearing anymore.

The thing about glam rockers is that they really believe that rock n' roll is defined by sex, drugs, tattoos, etc. They can't understand that those things only defined rock n' roll when they were considered "bad". Is there anything sadder than happily-married men like Gene Simmons or Vince Neil strutting around, saying that they still indulge in all those practices, that they have open sexual relationships, that they are still bad boys at 50!? Isn't it rather pathetic they still need to do that to sell records because their material is so bloody weak? Wouldn't it be more rock n' roll to use their relationships and new middle-aged lives to stimulate their material rather than living a lie?!

If rock n' roll is about honesty, which I believe it is, then the likes of Axl Rose, Robert Plant, Richie Blackmore and Slash have to score high. They behave as they want to behave. They don't do it to sell records or to play to any stereotype. Axl never tried to play to any stereotype. He behaved as he wanted to behave when he wanted to behave. He didn't care about swearing in records (before it was considered "the done thing" - I don't remember Motely Crue ever having the balls to do it), he didn't care about using offensive terms (black person and hooray for tolerance!), he didn't care about writing about sex and drugs one record and then lonliness, emptiness, love, hate, mental problems, etc, the next record. His honesty was the key to Guns' success and, indeed, to their ability to transcend their genre and their era.

If Motley Crue want to offend GNR and Axl, then that's fine. They are dead men walking anyway. Nobody wants to give them the time of day. They and their "act" is a walking freak-show - a throwback to a forgotten period of hair metal and glammed up dudes. They are an anachronism who, let's face it, have never even produced a half-decent song. Then they decide to make a comeback, not for artistic satisfation, but to make a quick buck by making a thrash-record, just because that's what happens to be hot at the moment.

Do you care when a tramp or a whore or a porn-star judges you? Of course not. And why? Because they are low-lifes: bottom-feeders who command no respect. It's the same with Motley Crue. I bet Axl laughed his arse off when/if he read those comments.

Wow i think we have an Axl ass licker here. Nikki Sixx's song writing is nothing short of excellence and Motley Crue were able to change their music style with the music scene unlike a certain band

Link to comment
Share on other sites

appetite for waiting does bring up some good points.

MaKin, as do you.

i am obviously a massive guns fan, but i'm also a big motley fan as well.

jesting or not, i think nikki sixx has quite an inferiority complex when it comes to all things guns. the crue were on the scene half a decade before guns, and guns surpassed them by leaps and bounds. personally, i don't think motley crue are on the same level musically as guns. nikki sixx wrote some good songs, but axl is a complete visionary as an artist and slash is simply annointed when it comes to his craft.

emo or not, nikki sixx should not be calling out axl or any member of guns for that matter. and i highly doubt slash a)passed out from drinking and/or B) tommy lee had the balls (pardon the pun) to put his balls on slash's chin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't really heard that much Motley Crue to be honest. I like Sick Love Song. If Vince Neil still holds a grudge well fair enough that is down to him. You's verbally abuse him calling him immature but that so-called ''Rivallry'' between them is just on par with Axl vs. Slash. I don't hear you's calling your heroes immature etc.

I seriously don't see why this comment should be taken to heart. The guys are both in rock bands - Motley Crue just want to get out there and play. I respect that cos I hear they put on a great show. Guns N' Roses, they ain't doin' much about nothin' but maybe they will someday. Velvet Revolver and Adler's Appetite are all the same thing. These guys just have that space which Guns N' Roses used to fill for them. They want to play music and have fun because that's what it's all about. If Axl can say like Slash has done ''It's water undere the bridge'', then we may get a reunion. But for now Axl is working on his own Guns N' Roses and Slash doesn't care anymore. He wants to see what Axl has done with it. We all do.

Anyway I went off topic a bit but Clyde just beat Celtic 2-1 in the Scottish cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Motley Crue were able to change their music style with the music scene unlike a certain band

Changing their music and style because of a change in fashion....the word your looking for Mama Kin is sellout.

Listen to Motley Crue, Generation Swine and New Tattoo. These albums had a change in sound and direction in a musical sense compared to the Crues previous albums. As much as i love Guns N' Roses they couldn't change their sound to fit in with the scene of the 90's hence why we havn't seen anything since

Nikki Sixx's song writing is nothing short of excellence and Motley Crue were able to change their music style with the music scene unlike a certain band

:laugh::laugh::rofl-lol::rofl-lol:

That was a joke, right??

No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow i think we have an Axl ass licker here. Nikki Sixx's song writing is nothing short of excellence and Motley Crue were able to change their music style with the music scene unlike a certain band

lol are you for real?..... They haven't produced a good song in 20 years! :rofl-lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GO MOTLEY CRUE...

Tommy:

When Guns was opening for us, Slash thought he could keep up with us drinking Jack. So we started ripping em back. Slash throws up. We got him back to one of our rooms, laid him down on the bed, put our nut sacs right on his chin and took a fucking Polaroid of it. I think we laminated it and made that his tour pass.

hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...