Jump to content

Kickingthehabit

Members
  • Posts

    1,874
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kickingthehabit

  1. 1 hour ago, AlterL said:

    He kept Pitman until literally Pitman decided to force himself out. If he hadn't rant all over the internet he Would still Be here.

    Why would he call them a shitty nostalgia act if he were still part of the band? Slash and Duff are in charge of the band's sound. Axl said that himself. They work with the drummer. They decide the rhythms and tempos. It wasn't working with Pitman, so they fired him. That's when he started bitching on twitter. He was told to remove the Coachella announcement because they knew he wasn't going to be included.

    Just my opinion.

    • Like 2
  2. Who cares if they got back together for money? These 2016 performances have been spectacular, and there's obviously some level of friendship or else Axl would have vetoed Steven Adler and probably kept Chris Pitman. I feel like Slash and Duff made those two things happen, which we should all be thankful for. You can tell Axl also expressed his sadness over S+D not supporting him as a songwriter (waah) which is why Duff goes out of his way to bring up Chinese Democracy all the time. It's a way to build back trust and say, "We support you and want to record new music together."


    I think it'll work out.

    • Like 3
  3. 16 minutes ago, Hell House said:

     

     my guess - it's about money. I think Izzy deserves an equal share with Slash and Axl. 

    The worst thing Izzy did was leave the partnership, but I think they would have tried to force him out regardless. He became too antagonistic during UYI. Refusing to record overdubs, no showing, lifeless performances. Axl, Slash and Duff had their fair share of problems, but they could (and still can) come to an agreement as business partners, whereas Izzy was a pain in the ass. The question becomes, "Why have four people in charge of Guns N' Roses when we can have three?" Still wish he was there :(

    • Like 3
  4. 3 minutes ago, gnr>everything said:

    How is this different than all the people who felt the need to chime in and say that the models probably weren't smart? Like we haven't heard that at least a thousand times either?

    Did you even read the original post? Smart , mercenary models. Jesus Christ. Is it so inappropriate to laugh at the banality of someone attempting to turn this into a legitimate discussion. 

    • Like 2
  5. Just now, toroymoi said:

    What a pleasant person you are. Congrats on being a condescending prick.

    And what you've done is indulged in a form of narcissism known as "image crafting," chiming in with an opinion we’ve heard at least a thousand times. Not all models are stupid. Great work, Social Justice Warrior!!! You're smart and you can say adult things!

     

    7 minutes ago, bigpoop said:

    I would bet he doesn't even know what that is.

    I'm sure a guitar player with 30+ years experience has never spent a day or two fucking around with jazz scales. Can you walk and chew bubble-gum at the same time? Hard to imagine.

  6. 10 minutes ago, toroymoi said:

    I was just arguing against the point that 'model=dumb'.

    And what a GROUNDBREAKING feminist adult opinion you have! What's next? Refusing to adhere to the narrow parameters of gender pronouns? Continue to wow us with your insanely obvious points!

    It's okay to laugh at a few dumb bimbos. They're at a fucking Guns N' Roses party. It's not exactly a Richard Dawkins conference.

×
×
  • Create New...