Randy Lahey Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 (edited) Who had the better movies, Steven Seagal or Jean Claude Van Damme? To me it's hands down Steven Seagal. I loved Hard to Kill, Marked for Death, Above the Law and Under Seige. Watching him break people's arms was priceless. Edited December 30, 2012 by Randy Lahey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DizzyReedsexmachine Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 they both suck imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izzygirl Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Van Damme. But I prefer Steven Seagal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
classicrawker Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 They both suck.........but at least Jean Claude was in shape Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izzygirl Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 They both suck.........but at least Jean Claude was in shapeYes, but Seagal would need like 5 seconds to kill Van Damme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bionic56 Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Gotta say they both suck balls, but just van damme, more of his films are watchable, only just. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsh327 Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 I'd have to go with Seagal just because I liked a few more movies than I did from the Muscles from Brussels. I did watch JCVD which was kind of a depressing flick, but I guess he wanted to do some drama. It was kind of like seeing someone who did porn be in a serious flick and you'd go "he's not a bad actor". Seagal's acting, or that show where he was a cop was really bad to watch.Van Damme's prob. the better actor, but odds are no one's banging down their doors to cast them in movies that are barely better than a porn flick with a budget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobodys_Fault Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Van Damme by a wide margin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.United Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Why compare when you can have them both? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coma16 Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 They both had more crap movies than they had good ones. From the good ones it's hard to choose whose are better. I loved all the Segal movies mentioned in the OP (with the addition of Exit Wounds) but are they better than Bloodsport, Kickboxer, Lionheart, and Double Impact? Tough one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Van Damme. He has more charisma in his foot that Stephen Segal does in his whole body. Van Damme would also beat Seagal into a pulp in a real fight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron_H Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 They both suck.........but at least Jean Claude was in shapeYes, but Seagal would need like 5 seconds to kill Van Damme. Shut your face, Spaniard! JCVD = Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roush Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Gotta side with Van Damme. Time Cop ftw! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bran Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Van Damme by a wide margin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MB. Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Seagal, cause his movies are absolutaly hilarious! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streak Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Good question.I would say JCVD edges it. He has charisma and character, and comes across better. Seagal comes across as an asshole. JCVD made the better films, although theres not much in it. JCVD was also better looking and better physically.Seagal would beat him in a fight, he is actually rated in his martial art, Aikido. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazey Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Under Siege 1&2 are both better films than anything JCVD's ever done but for sheer enjoyment it's gotta be Van Damme. Bloodsport on its own to be fair! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streak Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 doesn't the villian in under siege 2 remind you of nigel from eastenders?i love watching seagal movies, its like his in god mode Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Good question.I would say JCVD edges it. He has charisma and character, and comes across better. Seagal comes across as an asshole. JCVD made the better films, although theres not much in it. JCVD was also better looking and better physically.Seagal would beat him in a fight, he is actually rated in his martial art, Aikido.I think that JCVD would beat Seagal in a fight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streak Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 no he wouldn't. seagal is proven, JCVD is not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 no he wouldn't. seagal is proven, JCVD is notProven what? He got his accreditation from his father-in-law. The only person that Seagal has beaten in a real fight is Kelly LeBrock. JCVD, on the other-hand, is a former professional karate fighter at a national level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izzygirl Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 Good question.I would say JCVD edges it. He has charisma and character, and comes across better. Seagal comes across as an asshole. JCVD made the better films, although theres not much in it. JCVD was also better looking and better physically.Seagal would beat him in a fight, he is actually rated in his martial art, Aikido.I think that JCVD would beat Seagal in a fight.No.Seagal isn't just good at Aikido, he is brilliant. He absolutely knows what he does, and moreover, he is bigger. Van Damme is only better spreading his legs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron_H Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 (edited) Good question.I would say JCVD edges it. He has charisma and character, and comes across better. Seagal comes across as an asshole. JCVD made the better films, although theres not much in it. JCVD was also better looking and better physically.Seagal would beat him in a fight, he is actually rated in his martial art, Aikido.I think that JCVD would beat Seagal in a fight.No.Seagal isn't just good at Aikido, he is brilliant. He absolutely knows what he does, and moreover, he is bigger. Van Damme is only better spreading his legs.Aikido is for 14 year old girls. JCVD did Karate and Kickboxing iirc. JCVD ftw. Edited December 31, 2012 by Aaron_H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izzygirl Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 (edited) Good question.I would say JCVD edges it. He has charisma and character, and comes across better. Seagal comes across as an asshole. JCVD made the better films, although theres not much in it. JCVD was also better looking and better physically.Seagal would beat him in a fight, he is actually rated in his martial art, Aikido.I think that JCVD would beat Seagal in a fight.No.Seagal isn't just good at Aikido, he is brilliant. He absolutely knows what he does, and moreover, he is bigger. Van Damme is only better spreading his legs.Aikido is for 14 year old girls. JCVD did Karate and Kickboxing iirc. JCVD ftw.Yes, and Karate is for skinny boys like you. No big difference. Van Damme is ridiculous. I could beat him myself. Edited December 31, 2012 by izzygirl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron_H Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 Good question.I would say JCVD edges it. He has charisma and character, and comes across better. Seagal comes across as an asshole. JCVD made the better films, although theres not much in it. JCVD was also better looking and better physically.Seagal would beat him in a fight, he is actually rated in his martial art, Aikido.I think that JCVD would beat Seagal in a fight.No.Seagal isn't just good at Aikido, he is brilliant. He absolutely knows what he does, and moreover, he is bigger. Van Damme is only better spreading his legs.Aikido is for 14 year old girls. JCVD did Karate and Kickboxing iirc. JCVD ftw.Yes, and Karate is for skinny boys like you. Not big difference. Van Damme is ridiculous. I could beat him myself.I'll kick your ass, Spaniard! Bring it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.